Re: Surely though
.... a highly public embarrassment for Inspector Knacker.
But a sizeable end of year bonus for the CEO of the company that sold the kit to the Met.
(and, hopefully, the salesperson as well)
// "fixed in next release"
2190 publicly visible posts • joined 18 May 2016
Canada’s Currency Act of 1985 limits to the number of coins you can use in a transaction. If it’s nickels, vendors can say no to any purchase over $5, while the loonie limit is $25;
...and here's the odd thing: the TOONIE LIMIT (Part I, Section 8(2)(a)) is, not $50, as you might expect, but $40. (both coins weigh the same)
So much for those sensible Canadians, eh?
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-52/page-1.html
Kinder Eggs not withstanding.
Funny you should mention those. My wife spotted some in a store here in the TRUMP(R) USofA just recently.
However, not the original Kinder Eggs. These have apparently been modified (two packages: one for the chocolate and one for the toy) to be safe for USA children.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/the-us-is-finally-lifting-its-ban-on-kinder-eggs-a3691696.html
Clinton lost because she is the most corrupt politician in American politics...
That's a pretty high bar you've set there, pardner!
She's up against some of the best, and I doubt she's even in their class. Let's look at the (recent) contenders:
- The inimitable William "Boss" Tweed
- Boston's own James Michael Curley
- Mayor Richard J. Daley
- Nixon (though probably more paranoid than corrupt)
- Spiro T Agnew (conspiracy, bribery and tax fraud)
- our current President (and his "fixer", sons, son-in-law and daughter)
The goal was not to get you to vote for Trump, the goal was to stir the pot, encourage class and race division, create a sense of injustice and oppression, and generally disrupt society and trust in our institutions.
I can't help, though, but think that "turnabout is fair play", given all the messing with foreign elections the US has done around the world since the Second World War. The chickens have come home to roost, and it's not much fun.
Pedant here:
...stable for his calvary's horses....
Calvary = the hill on which Christ was crucified
Cavalry = bunch of armed blokes on horses
Same number of letters, same letters, different order, different meaning.
Probably Microsoft spell correct. Check that you haven't got "evangelical (US)" mode selected?
Here in the USofA, I once used an automated check-out machine at the home improvement store, gave it a $20 for a $17 purchase and received three $10 notes in change.
Being an honest kind of guy, I went over to the "watcher" and presented her with my receipt, the three $10 notes, a smile, and told her, "No."
I have never seen the staff at Lowe's move so quickly before, or after. Must have been a one time event.
They opened up the machine, handed me my $3, and I left, while they attempted to figure out how many people before me had neglected to inform them of the error.
Best Saturday morning fun I've had outside the bedroom in...forever.
At my current employer, but at a previous location, a select few employees were given "fire extinguisher training". The rest of us were told that under no circumstances, were we allowed to use the extinguishers, since we had not been properly trained. We should, instead, contact an authorised employee.
Words failed me. I'm an EE, we occasionally work with high power stuff, and had an extinguisher in the lab. Should the need arise, I told my boss, I would use the extinguisher, pull the alarm and deal with any administrative consequences at a later time. He, to his credit, agreed.
// Dear Sir/Madam: FIRE!
// appropriate icon at last
...a cyanide gas story...
I'm curious as to what made the teacher in question think that this would ever be a good idea, as opposed to...say...CO2 or H2 gas? And, assuming he thought it over several times and decided it *would* be a good idea, why he would ever use anything more than a minute quantity of chemicals, since cyanide is colorless.
For the more adventurous:
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/category/things-i-wont-work-with
@Andy Taylor
Simulators: my son was stationed with an attack helicopter (AH-64) squadron in Korea as an artillery fire control officer. They couldn't take him for a ride (both cockpits must be pilots) but they did let him try the simulator.
He crashed it so hard they had to reboot it :-)
(his only prior experience flying helicopters was radio control models...and he wasn't very good at that either)
I've been to the Museum of Flight (Seattle) and seen their Concorde. Beautiful aircraft, doesn't really matter that it never paid. I do know someone who got a flight on it, and he told me it was worth the money.
Sure wish the cockpit was open, but I understand why it can't be.
I'd love to see a photo of Concorde with the Saarinen TWA terminal at Kennedy in the background. The two look like they were made to go together.
Also -- the PanAm plane in Kubrick's 2001 looks very Concorde-ish.
To be fair politicians have been doing that for over a hundred years.
Creating problems, yes, certainly.
Fixing them? Hardly ever.
"Fixing" them by creating another (often worse) problem? Much more likely.
Sitting on their fat asses and debating how to rename something or declaring this week "Hard Working Politicians Week", while studiously avoiding addressing the real issues of the day? Standard Operating Procedure.
// hard to decide whether it should be the lawyers or the politicians first against the wall
I once kept a guy on the line for 10 minutes while following his directions on a Linux system.
When he wanted me to hit the Windows key, I told him I didn't have one. This was true...I have an IBM Model M keyboard on my system. He finally gave up and told me to call Microsoft.
I replied, "When I do, should I tell them I'm running Linux?"
His reaction was: "Sh...<click>"
I'm having some fun with the mechanical engineering intern at work. He's just finishing up his ME degree, and is working here for 6 months. Perfect ground in which to plant seeds of appreciation for obsolete technology.
I've introduced him to Teletypes (thanks to YouTube) and ancient analog synthesizers. To his credit, he's fascinated.
There may be hope.
// IBM plugboard wires in the pocket, thanks
...read Chanson de Roland in the original Anglo-Norman...
Well, I was supposed to, but I only got partway through the first page. Same with Beowulf. Must go back and give it another try.
I did read Hamlet all the way through on day. It made perfect sense. Next time I tried it...not so much. Apparently, I was "in the zone" for Shakespeareanan prose that day.
You should vote though, even if it is for Trump.
First part of the sentence is true...you should definitely vote.
Second part: IF you're considering voting for Trump, stop, think, and do some research. He is not (at a minimum) a very nice person. He's also made our country the laughing stock of the world, because:
(a) He seems to be incapable of forming complete, coherent sentences
(b) He doesn't listen to any advice from people who have real knowledge
(c) I'm not a doc, but he seems to be "losing it", to put it charitably
See, here's the difference between Repubs' view of Obama, and Dems' view of Trump:
Reps: Illegitimate president; Kenyan Muslim! He's gonna take our guns! (and, by the way, he's BLACK!)
Dems: WTF? This guy's not smart enough to tie his own shoes. And he seems to have put the office of President up for sale to industry. (Oh, and all his friends seem to have Russian connections)
And, FWIW, I'm a Dem. I immediately accepted him as President. I wasn't happy, but was willing to be proven wrong. That hasn't happened. I wasn't in love with Hillary, but, JFC, she's able to put together a sentence. And she has foreign policy experience. But that's water under the bridge. We're stuck with him. At least, until he shoots off his own...whatever.