Re: Bankruptcy is shameful in Japan...
So brave a deed is it, that doing it four times makes you an Olympian god!
1266 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Mar 2016
Al the USA security services say the Russians were trying to hack the election. (They just say 'tried'). Congress apparently believes them, and have slapped on more sanctions. If Mrs Clinton is the evil-doer here, why aren't they slapping charges of treason on her or someone in her party?
The election was over six months ago. Trump and the Republicans won. Theya re in charge. Get used to it. Even giving Trump a three mont easing-in period, which the GOP did not need, I'd say everythign from, oh, 31 May, is down to Trumpa nd the Republicans. Your guys are in charge, Big John. What do you fear?
A nationally-owned TV and radio service that isn't beholden to corporate billionaires and thus enslaved tot heir views, and which is commercial-free and whose purpose is to provide all sectors with impartial and trustworthy information and good, representative entertainment -- this would be great. I am happy to pay a licence fee for that.
But is that what we are getting? How can we get that from a company that becomes more and more corporately distasteful? My station of choice BBC radio 3, is so dumbed-down and so out-sourced that I barely listen to it any more.
It does seem time either to pull the BBC up by its socks or to cut it loose from public money.
I have many pieces of university paper in very non-marketable areas, but I simply point out, at interview, that I taught myself, as a graduate student, how to set up a project, how to direct myself to a successful on time, on budget finish (i.e. got the degree), and so had proven that I was able to work hard for a goal often many years away. Oh, and I was both details-oriented and yet could see the bigger picture. Also, could read Latin. And Anglo-Saxon.
I wouldn't put money on the change. I have 23 years old men coming into my team that still don't get that the word is not 100% white guys (with the occasional Asian guy just coming into focus) with a few other lesser life forms floating around to be the target of jokes, leers and contempt.
The only thing that keeps me hanging on is the great guys who respect talent and brains no matter what outer wrapping it has.
Women don't learn what's out there to be had, so they accept what they're offered, and agents want to sell cheaper talent.
If you think you are worth a certain amount argue for it. Don't do a preemptive cringe.
I say that as a woman who got £30k more just for digging my heels in.
We've lost hundreds of thousands of languages and can't therefore measure the ways of thinking they represent. I remember learning that Gaelic didn't have words for the same colours as English, they had ones for blue-greens and grey-blues that we don't have. Even English has lost many precise words -- a good half-dozen simply for parts of a wheel. As we simplify and homogenise we end up with 'stuff' and 'thing' and other generalisations that lessen exactitude and the joy of language.
So I don't want one world language, just as I don't want one form of music and one kind of car.
I already know my firm pays non-white men less than white men, all women here less than the non-white men, and non-white women less than their white sisters. Why? Because they can, and they can get away with it. For now.
Do I think non-white men and all women will be paid more fairly in the future? No. The rules will be jigged, somehow.
Whose agenda, I wonder? The actor's? Presumably she wants to be successful in the role. The new Doctor Who's? To fight evil and succeed at Time Lord stuff. The writers? To build up a bigger fan base. The producers? To have a hugely successful show. The BBC? To get more viewers and to be able to sell a stronger series overseas.
And...that's it.
Us pesky feminazis, running every international corporation, taking over every board room, in charge of every large charity, dominating the UK Supreme Court and ditto the House of Commons. Yes, ha ha ha we have come to bring all men into slavery! You have named and shamed with your Daily Mail article on why too many women doctors means the end of our species. Oh noes!
...then why exclude shows with strong followings? Or do these strong female roles have to battle against entrenched favorites by starting new series? Doctor Who is supposed to be shockingly strange. If the new Doctor was an orca or an elephant or some other intelligent species, it would be fun and weird. It's a bit sad that a female human is seen as not-fun and challenging.
@meph... Thanks for your replies. I have a Canadian colleague who is going to attend and was deciding not too after getting lots of hassle in US Customs in the airport going to the last one. He said the queue took forever, that he feared for his laptop and phone, and he had to keep explaining why, as a Canadian, he was coming in from France (where he works).
The USA can close its borders and keep out anyone it wants to, but it has to expect that people will decide for themselves what to do about this. We foreigners can keep trying and run all sorts of risks, as well as unpleasantness, or we can go somewhere else. And we are going somewhere else.
It is called the logical consequences of initial action.
A sort of Plannet of the Apes, where humans (and perhaps most animals) are no more but the Tardis have plenty of time to evolve and fill all vacant ecological niches. Scaled up, the eight limbs can become all sorts of different things. Would they develop eyes, as has happened several time over the evolution of species? Or...?
Fun thoughts. Choosing a hero, now, and working out a future tardi culture: challenging.
Well, Mr John, The Reg is an online news site and it can't write the same article with the same words over and over, so it looks for new events to be able to run a theme. I think Net Neutrality is a fair and equal way of ensuring that corporations don't continue to shut out everyone but their own monopolies or cartels. El Reg brings to my attention where Governemnt agencies are siding with corporations and not helping ordinary Americans. Do you think their facts are incorrect, or is it their tone and approach you don't care for?
The sort of journalism that flourished around, say, 1776 and onward was foul-mouthed vituperative and libellous. And yet the Founders supported a free press and even enshrined a free press in the founding documents of the USA. Journalists don't have to be impartial about issues, but they do have to be honest and accurate about facts. So they must report the facts and then they can go to town on interpreting them.
Johannes Magnus, you are partly right, in that Obama refrained from asking the FBI to look at growing proofs that the Russians had their fingers all over US election data and processes because he didn't want to appear to be meddling in an election. That lack of spine has resulted in the body-blow the USA has now received.
Now, personally, I was all for Trump, because I hoped he would weaken the USA and make it a laughing-stock around the world, thus diminishing it from 'top world power' to 'that crazy place that doesn't know its ass from its elbow' and so lead to a new balance of power. Sadly, that is not happening quickly enough, but I still have hopes for a Trump Administration meltdown.