Re: Gaming is the Key
Never had a game that did not work in Linux with Steam. Granted, I do not play the type of games that want kernel-level anti-cheat protection. So YMMV.
446 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Mar 2016
At a university on this side of the pond, you could phish as much as you like. Employees need to fill and sign a form and bring it to personal dept. to change anything related to the salary. In person. Antiquated? Maybe. But how often do you really need such changes? You probably change employers more frequently than that.
Basically, if you use LLM ‘advice’ to fix surface-level problems, you set up yourself for being absolutely lost later – when tasked with solving the subtle and non-local problems the previous fix created. Or you may be lucky and doing something simple for which the LLM-regurgitated stuff is sufficient. It can happen. Usually, could just do a web search and copy'n'paste from some guide/tutorial in such cases, but whatever.
Same here, not longer supported, blah, blah. Both lynx and links.
Text browsers worked for a while, demonstrating Google's hypocrisy – if Search worked in a text browser they could obviously send the same plain HTML to a GUI browser. That's probably why they were killed, not a technical reason.
Please stop this ‘rapid advance’ nonsense, in other words breaking everything constantly and completely unnecessarily (unless you consider being bad at your job a valid reason for breaking things).
Give me my FFTWs, SQLites and plainTeXs and FORTRAN77 code doing some useful maths and leave me be.
[Icon of old man yelling at cloud]
You cannot escape AIfication so easily. Quoting Zoho website:
> Now with Zia across the board
> Zia is Zoho's AI-powered intelligent assistant trained to help you work better.
> In Writer, she's a writing assistant who helps you find grammatical errors, style inconsistencies and more, while in Sheet she's a data-analyst who helps you make data-driven decisions better. She's also your note-taking assistant who can search the web for you, draw references and add them to a note card on your command.
So, I am keeping my LibreOffice.
Even though everyone being like this would be probably a disaster, we NEED such people.
Because of course the spreadsheet formula does not include the last two cells, one reference is off by a column, it says *2 instead of +2 and no one has noticed MS Excel silently converted rows seven and eight to dates…
Admittedly, I have not read the technical details. But you do not need to decrease entropy to forget some data – you can do the exact opposite. It will make the LLM a tiny bit worse overall, but… who cares.
I am sorry to inform you that Ø is slashed uppercase-Oh (used in Nordic languages). It has nothing to do with the digit zero, which has quite a different shape. Also, consequently, I now hate you. But you are in a good company as most people can't tell the differences between dash and hyphen…
Yes, my reaction to ‘identifying 1000 journals’ was (unfortunately): That's pretty easy, just make a list of those that e-mail me weekly.
I do not understand who publishes there. Even if you are desperate to publish something, papers in such ‘journals’ will not help you. It will make you an academic pariah as soon as people find out.
> The three leading commercial models tested … all recognize actual visual illusions…
Do they?
Common optical illusion images are ‘standardised’. People had tried different things but then finally arrived at a few ‘canonical’ versions which work well to demonstrate the particular illusion. These are widespread with only minor variations – and plenty of labelled copies in the training data. So the classifier recognises these standard images (and similar).
In order to say the classifiers recognise optical illusions, they would have to test *novel* (or very obscure/atypical) optical illusions. Then maybe we could say they learned some fundamental properties of images which make them visual illusions. But the testing images look like canonical examples.
So, nothing to see here.
> From now on, the US government will deal only with AI that pursues truth, fairness and strict impartiality.
These do not exist. At the minimum, it would require the training data and process to have such attributes.
So a favourable reading of such statement would be that they will not purchase any AI snakeoil. Of course, in reality it means they will only purchase from their cronies. For these idiots, truth = the content of Trump's last tweet and impartiality = spewing out our side's propaganda.
They cannot make a usable OS. Like one where you can just find how to change screen resolution because it is in a logical place.
So they instead add an unstructured natural-language command line thingy (let's call it what it is). Which does not even behave deterministically. But on the plus side, it spies on you!
And people still complain Linux is complicated…
This and thousand times this!
MS Windows is incomprehensible. No regular user actually understands how to do anything in MS Windows (and it applies equally to Apple users, if not more). At best they fumble about, achieve something randomly by googling and Brownian motion and then memorise the resulting completely stupid way of doing something as the only way of doing that thing…
The root cause is not that Linux (or any other OS) is complicated. The solution is not to make it simpler.
The feet for height and altitude I always find weird. You use imperial units because you want nice human-sized quantities, right? You have a plethora of units to choose from. So why has every mountain height and plane altitude be some ridiculously large number? And you can't even say 40 kft because that would be too SI…
You need a separate PhD to understand Oracle licensing… And, as other pointed out, there are lots of DIY and BYOD going on, often simply because everything would fall apart if people were not doing it. In other words, a large grey area Oracle would love to audit and cause mayhem (whether they have any actual right to do so or not).
KDE has actually one of the better Wayland implementations (with a bunch of additions to make it reasonable).
But, yeah. The entire debate has always been between ‘we have this software and users love how it works across all platforms – except it breaks in Wayland because [SOMETHING] is impossible by design there’ and ‘we have this grand philosophy how GUIs should work in abstract and if you do not write your synchrotron control system to work with windows wrapped around a 3D bunny rabbit[*] you are a bad person’.
[*] See https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2021-May/041844.html if you do not believe…
Why is ‘limiting supply of second hand phones’ fundamentally bad? When everyone uses their device until it is dead, completely dead, beyond any hope of upgrade or repair – that is the most eco-friendly thing to do:
(a) It means every device is utilised to its maximum possible lifetime, and
(b) the device is not shipped around the world needlessly to switch users.
The only missing piece is that you should not throw it to the nearest river but dispose of it responsibly. And Europeans are relatively good at this part too.
I use Palemoon, and user agent string are not the main compatibility problem. Occasionally something does not work right or is too slow (including some of our silly internal systems – solved by using FF). Occasionally something complains but works acceptably nonetheless.
The biggest problem seems ‘feature canaries’. Websites check for some random feature X, which they may not use at all, and when the browser does not support it they conclude it does not support Y and Z they actually need, throw a tantrum and refuse to load at all.
But then, most of modern popular web is utter crap and I only touch it when necessary and with a burner browser profile. So what do I know…
Even though things like Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics or superdeterminism exist, quantum mechanical randomness behaves as ‘truly random’ as far as we know. We have ruled out all the naïve ideas that/how it is not actually truly random.
And the other interpretations are generally of the type that results of QM measurements still appear truly random to us, just the universe is even crueller than you thought.
Exactly. You have SSDs for everyday fast access. But your longer-term high-capacity storage is unlikely to be SSDs. It does not have the capacity/price ratio. And trust.
We all have HDDs from the era before SSDs became common still happily spinning and storing data (even though the capacity is usually laughable now). There are practically no really old SSDs still working. The longevity might be improving but gaining trust in storage takes decades.