Re: My Optimus is gonna
There'll be a new man of the house providing for them, whilst the old one lounges around being fat and lazy.
274 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Aug 2007
Are you real or fake? I can't tell if you're joking. That's a future I don't want to live in. I don't get people at all, or understand how to interact with them, but seeing them being taken away and replaced with automation just leaves me hollow. Technology designed for use by non-techies is even more baffling than the non-techies. I don't see any reason currently to bother with the future. It'll be a little bit interesting to watch (until the means to see it breaks), and staggeringly depressing.
"I'm still hoping AGI / GAI turns out to be impossible and a big marketing hype / scam."
I believe it is impossible, but you can't prove the negative so we'll all just have to wait until the blockheads give up trying. A lot of damage may be done in the meantime.
"Now add in the fact it can make decisions faster than we can blink"
That reminds me of a 1970 documentary on the subject, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project
"I'm lazy, and will assume as a Fermi estimate that a Yank dollar's thickness is approximately that of a UK banknote"
UK banknotes are approx 1/11th of a millimetre thick. A stack of £20 notes is £220/mm, or £220million/Km, which last time I looked was less than the cost of building HS2.
That's a lie first peddled by Clive Sinclair to explain why the LED digits on his calculator flashed (~30Hz IIRC) to a general public who at the time would not have understood multiplexing. Without a nearly linear relationship between mean light level and the eye's response then DLP video projectors won't work well.
"I only wish other manufacturers would do something about their ridiculously bright LED headlights."
The problem I have with them is that there is *NO* warm up time, or any kind of soft start, so your eyes have no time to adjust when they flash their high beam. Halogen lamps have a short but sufficient warm up time, even HID headlight lamps have a warm up.
The regulators have completely failed with vehicle lighting regulations over the last 25+ years. Turn indicators should not be allowed to use clear lenses*, and the front ones should be positioned at the front of the car and not halfway round the sides. And I'm fucked off with getting a face full of 3rd brake light in every traffic queue. And why do all LED lights have to use PWM and visibly flash? LED's are DC devices that work at any current up to their rated maximum, just use a lower current or fewer or smaller LEDs.
* Changing luminance is more noticeable than changing chrominance.
"Why on earth, in these days of solar heated water have they removed the hot fill connection from a lot of the washing machines?"
Combi boilers is probably why. Most people have those. The inlet hoses can't cope with hot water at mains pressure (look at one to see), internal hoses and other parts may not either, and the water hammer is likely bad for the boiler.
It literally did for me, once I scrolled down the page to the questionnaire, it suddenly started getting unstoppably longer with emptyness, the scroll bar shrinking to oblivion as my screen displayed an ever smaller proportion of the expanding page. It was like the expansion of the universe all over again.
On to the subject of the article, by the time we know burning satellites is a bad thing, our future doom is already up there waiting to come down and poison us a fuck load more. happy happy!
What you describe sounds more like it's increasing the frame rate by trying to predict tween frames. My friends 4K 60Hz samsung does this if I feed it a video file encoded at 24,25 or 30Hz. If I feed it a 25 or 30 frame video file encoded at twice the rate, such that each frame is duplicated, it doesn't fuck with the image and displays what was in the video file. The problem is that there is insufficient temporal resolution at 25 or 30 Hz to be able to make accurate estimation of motion, and the process is completely unable to understand movement of light and shade. It appears to be using the motion information directly from the video file, which doesn't account for occlusion, which is probably the source of these artifacts. A lot of people seem to be blind to this, but i find it rather jarring when bits of the image that my eyes are naturally drawn to drop the frame rate.
Neural radiance fields may one day solve these issues, and allow you to move the camera position too.
"If you don't like the rules, you can leave. Nobody is forcing you to stay there."
Exactly this. If more people were prepared to stand up for themselves at work, then work wouldn't be the shitbox it is now. That involves risking your current employment. But that means not stretching yourself so far that your life becomes critically dependent on a continuous income. It seems people would rather buy shiny things.
"So…er… it was the crane’s fault?"
The company that owned or operated the crane are so unimportant that they aren't even named in the article, but amazon are a very important company, so it's obvious that the big lumbering crane is expected to give way to the agile drones with their very important AA batteries.
They work for the people who pay them. Whilst on the face of it we pay them, actually they TAKE a wage, we do not choose to pay them. Their donors choose to pay them, so that's who they work for, because the donors can choose to not pay them.
The only power we have over politicians is to vote in superior alternatives when we are given the chance....
Surely the latency is due to the display frame rate, not the rendering frame rate, so there is no benefit to rendering excess frames as pinball was doing.
If the rendering is a non-integer multiple of the display frame rate, then motion will become juddery, something that I find distracting. A large excess will reduce the judder.
Speaking of frame rates, do these new fangled variable frame rate systems work for video playback yet?
Early 2026 doesn't look like a moments notice to me. Maybe microsoft themselves have identified the risk that it may be deemed to fall under the act in the future, and are implementing the changes at their own pace hoping it won't happen in the meantime.
I can't find anywhere on the page that says it re-stripes the data. It's deliberately cagey on this issue. The only relevant sentence I can find is "The process works by redistributing existing data across the new disk configuration, creating a contiguous block of free space at the end of the logical RAID-Z group."
An example is given where a 4 disk raid5 (file backed disks, 10G size) is expanded to 5 disks. 4.77G of data is written to the 4 disk filesystem, consuming 6.38G, leaving 33.1G of 39.5G free. After adding a the fifth disk, usage is now 6.38G with 43.1G free. 4.77 *4/3 = 6.36G, that's consistent with 6.38G reported usage for 4 disk raid5. 4.77 *5/4 = 5.96G, which is not consistent with 5 disk raid5 usage reported by the ZFS tools. It has *not* re-striped any data in the given example.
Not properly, it doesn't re-stripe the existing data like mdadm or btrfs, it just evens out the disk usage.
A 3 disk raid5 expanded to 5 will inherit the same 50% parity overhead for existing data, new data written will have 25% overhead. If it was full before expanding, then you only gain the capacity of 1.6 disks.
It cannot shrink. Less likely to need this, but I might.
The BcacheFS feature I'm looking for is raid5/6 with built-in checksumming / correction on error, with the ability to add/remove disks from the filesystem.
MDADM on top of DM-integrity (with any FS on top) can do this, but it's a bit complex and using journaling for resiliency in case of power loss leads to a large write-amplification on SSD's, or slow performance on HDD's.
BTRFS can do this, but if a disk fails then it's not guaranteed to work, and it's not resilient against power loss while writing. BTRFS was designed before they understood raid5/6, it's supposed to be a copy-on write filesystem but their implementation of raid5/6 breaks this.
ZFS is inflexible, it's designed for server use, I'm a home user with an above average amount of data. I can't just create a bigger filesystem on new disks and copy all the data over when I need to expand.
BcacheFS can do copy-on-write and raid5/6 at the same time. However, I don't think much of the erasure coding functionality has been implemented yet. But it's achitecture looks much more sensible than btrfs.
"Make one Linux desktop distro."
who's gonna do that? The nebulous "they" that my friend who doesn't understand how the world works keeps complaining about, or someone else? how much should it cost? who's gonna stop anyone else making a distro?
"Nor is the latest version of gedit of interest to somebody who escapes the boredom of their daily grind by reading some red top in the bog."
i don't think a computer is the right product for such a person, any more than an xl bully would be the right product for me. i mean, as long as i just feed it it'll work out what to do for itself, won't it?
computers are not yet a mature product ready for non-technical people. i'm not expecting any upvotes, i'm just angry with the world now, all of it.
"For now, OpenAI restored GPT-4o for paying users, but we have no doubt that, once OpenAI figures out what makes the model so endearing and how they can apply it to GPT-5, they'll do just that."
I would imagine it's simply that if people are now using these models to actually do real work (as they'd like people to do), they don't want the models behaviour to change every 5 fucking minutes.
"one of the three pouch cells inside the Acer's lithium-ion battery was missing"
This needs an explanation. Was it never fitted? Was the battery damaged in an earlier incident? How did the did the device ever work? Did it shrivel up in the fire? Was it stolen by a fireman? Are they sure there was supposed to be three cells?
"My mates suspects a lot of fake jobs just advertised to gather CVs"
I don't work in IT, but this has been a thing for years. That's one reason I try to avoid employment agencies. The other reason is tax scams dressed as "a new government initiative" exploiting naive employees.
Works here too, but I'm not a power user by any means.
The trouble is that if I need to search the net for how to do something, increasingly the answer involves systemd commands, most commonly to restart a service.
Most of the internet seems to ignore Devuan, even ventoy won't run it's installation ISO image (last time I tried). Looks like we're going to be left out in the cold.
"Getting HDDs OFF OF SATA III (6Gbps) is the key to allowing them to be faster."
HDD's are still limited by how fast the bits go under the read/write heads. Only 1 head is used to read or write at a time, which I assume is down to tracking tolerances.
Modern HDD's are nano-precision marvels! I have some 7200rpm drives that max out at around 240MB/s on the outer tracks, that's 2MB on a track about 250mm long, so 8 bytes/micron, 64 bits/micron, so bits are about 16nm long. Inner tracks are half the length, so a mean of 1.5MB per track. 1TB per platter side suggests around 670,000 tracks, spanning a sweep of about 20mm, or 33.5 tracks/micron, or about 30nm apart. It's working at similar scales to transistors on modern chips (which aren't as small as 2 or 3 or 5 or 7 nm that process names might suggest), which require some rather expensive equipment to make.