I wonder what Keith Vaz will do....
Probably a tough day sitting on the Justice Committee watching some porn.. before another line of coke and f*cking a rent boy.
Hoping he wasn't caught on video, because *that* would be wrong.
650 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Feb 2016
As they seem to want to make criminals out of anyone seeing anything that you might not want your servants seeing, they are bound to force people into using Tor, VPNs and proxies. In fact most internet savvy teens are already using them...
Hopefully one brave ISP (!) will refuse to censor sites (they are hardly "qualified" and won't want the burden), and take it to the courts, if only to point out the idiocy in stopping people seeing acts that they can legally do. Most acts with age limits (smoking, drinking, driving... ) are fine to watch if you are too young to actually do them.
What's more, doing this increases the price per ship and that only makes the expense look worse.
There's $10 billion of R&D sunk (!) into this ship. Over 3 ships that adds $3 billion to the cost of each. Given a cost of $1 billion per ship that makes each cost $4 billion. Spread over 30 ships, however, each would cost $1.3 billion.
Quite a lot of that 10 billion R&D won't just be thrown away either.
Bluetooth? Arse-wiping is definitely something to be done remotely via my phone, but I want mine connecting to the internet, with full data upload to the cloud so that "analytics" can be done on methane levels, shit density, klingon count and optimized hot water usage.
After all, an IoT crapper is the perfect host for a bot net...
Send a conformation email if you change your account details or want something delivered to a different address....
Send an SMS if "unusual" activity is seen on your account...
Actually perform some analysis so that they pick up on "unusual" activity.
Not to mention requiring the CVV.
Tons of things they could do while retaining the convenience of retaining your credit card numbers...
I'm not a lawyer but I believe you are incorrect.
There's nothing illegal in exposing oneself - as long as it isn't intended to cause offence. I don't even think the "I didn't see it but I'd have been offended if I had" argument works either. For there to be an offence someone who was watching had to be offended.
And it's not illegal to watch either, as long as the performers know and consent.
In fact, the illegal voyeurism was performed by the coppers: "operates equipment with the intention of enabling another person to observe, for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, a third party doing a private act, and he knows that the third party does not consent to his operating equipment with that intention".
It is reasonable to assume that by having sex in a deserted area, at night, in a car, the doggers did not consent to the cops watching them.
And presumably this is indeed the case, otherwise the cops wouldn't be being prosecuted... "four counts of misconduct relating to watching and filming naked people without their consent and observing and recording people performing sexual acts".
For my own purposes the 38Mb/s I get is more than enough. What's more it's a relatively steady service, which is probably more important.
Before fibre the best I could get was 2Mb/s - on a good day with a following wind. As it would take more than an hour to download an hour's worth of viewing, live streaming was not possible. 38Mb/s is more than enough to support live streaming, but as with everything else computer related your demands increase to the limit of what's available. Streaming is possible, but can it support the kids streaming onto their phones at the same time as streaming TV, downloading music, playing games online... ?
At the moment the answer is yes (in fact easily), but I can foresee the day when I want to do more and 38Mb/s becomes a bottleneck.
That phone museum will come in handy when your drug-dealing* nephew** needs a couple of disposable handsets to go with anonymous pay-as-you-go SIMs.
* Drug dealer/trrrrst/freedom fighter/conspiracy theorist/bent copper: delete as appropriate.
** Other generic family members are available.
Fourth - though linked to first - why call it "mesh" technology when all you do is connect a laptop to a router?
I don't call my home Wi-Fi a "mesh", but it is considerably more sophisticated than that. But then I don't call my router an "access point", or my PC a "distributed-network client node".
But then you would disempower the "executives" paid bundles for providing services that they barely understand (and indeed don't feel the inclination to understand). These are middle-managers! The life blood of the civil service. Without them we would be shorn of bureaucracy and left with streamlined, efficient services - and what would middle-aged, middle-class, middle-ability men do then?
Think about what you're saying! Next you'll be suggesting that hospitals are run by doctors. And that MPs have "real-life" experience!
Asked if the affected customer data was encrypted or not, she replied: "The awful truth is that I don’t know".
The awful truth is that as a Baroness, a Conservative life peer, the wife of a Conservative minister and a personal friend of Call Me Dave, she doesn't give a toss because she knows she's bombproof.
Quite. What's more, who monitors the monitoring software?
They say that the problem is that humans make errors and so need to rely on software, but who created that software? And who is responsible for making sure it's still running correctly? There's a worrying degree of arrogance (and complacency) in "You're only human so you make mistakes... you need our software to monitor your system for those inevitable mistakes."
Though you have to remember that these people publishing their opinions are really just saying "You need our product".
John Hinckley Jr.'s attempted assassination of Reagan did nothing for gun control...
In this new Trump world they should have stressed American jobs for Americans...
"Them Chinese don't know security, we do... make good security a legal requirement and they can't sell into the US market. We can. Even when they catch up and can add security they will become less competitive. In the meantime we establish US brands and sell to those liberal Europeans who will be demanding security regulation!"
Doesn't matter if it's true or not, it plays on their fears and aspirations. Isn't that what Trump taught us?
It is bemusing that some of the complaints here come from people who think selfies are not acceptable... on the basis of "what's wrong with using a tripod and the camera's timer?".
As for "normal" people wanting to document their lives, even if only for their "friends", is that really any worse than endless publicity shots, autobiographies or even appearances on chat shows?
By the way, what they were objecting to was not people taking photos of themselves, but asking for a selfie with a celebrity. "Nobody asks for autographs anymore" complains Cleese - as if getting a complete stranger's signature is somehow less weird than having a photo taken with them. At least the photo is personal, unlike an autograph you could buy off eBay.
Read the paper!
"Since the Philips Hue smart lights are very popular in Europe and especially in affluent areas such as Paris, there is a very good chance that this threshold had in fact been exceeded"
The number of 15,000 comes from an estimated radius of 100m for each ZigBee device and the area of Paris being about 105 square kilometers. Infecting 15,000 will give a critical mass capable of infecting all the lights - though it is possible that infecting just one would be enough.
Why boast about our cyber warfare readiness if a DDoS attack can take down their website? It might be a minor inconvenience for their site to be down for 30 minutes... that kind of outage could be critical for someone else.
At the other end of the heating spectrum, apparently the latest version of iKettle doesn't have auto-switch-off-when-boiled unless the kettle is internet connected.
The Finns should connect some of these kettles to their boiler network - when the network goes down the heating switches off but the kettles boil dry, providing much needed heat!
It might not happen in Blighty because we are more concerned with getting mouth verrucas, but not because of the seating arrangements..
"lured a woman in her twenties into the driver's seat of his car to help him check the vehicle's brakes"
She was sat on the right (as in the UK) so her right foot would have been more easily accessible.
Apparently, director of the FBI " serves at the pleasure of the President".
Given that Comey broke protocol to announce an investigation with a week to go before the election, I expect he might not be so pleasing to a President Clinton... though clearly a favourite of a President Trump!
However, they have to hear you out if you use your IT lawyer skills...
"For your own protection, and for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, state security, I'm refusing."
If you are an IT professional you'd be more flexible, while covering your arse...
"A secure email server would be preferable. If you insist on an insecure server then I can do it but I'll need confirmation that you specifically requested an insecure system. In writing."
If you are an IT salesman you'd quickly see an opportunity...
"How about a secure email server... costs a bit more, but peace of mind is well worth the extra expense."
I'm not expecting financial standards, but the idea of generating keys on a device takes time and affects the production line (you might not think it's significant, but if you are mass-producing widgets then it is).
Then you have to generate a certificate - this will be worse than useless unless it is done securely, with an adequate certification key. Again that costs money.
In order to safeguard the keys then you might have to consider incorporating a secure element. The costs start to mount...
The whole idea of "Oh, I can lash this up in minutes" is why we are in this mess to start with! The whole system is no more secure than its weakest link.
No, it isn't rocket science.
However it does cost money, it does take time, and it is something that early IoT developers conveniently forgot to implement.
What's more, if you want to do it properly (like Visa and Mastercard insist smartcard manufacturers do) then you need an HSM housed in a secured manufacturing environment. Employees would need to be vetted, and maybe even searched ("airlock" type doors incorporate weighing sensors to tell if you go out heavier than you went in...). There are physical and logical security measures that need to be implemented...
This all costs a lot of money, involves a lot of attention to detail, and isn't quick to set up (let alone retro-fit). It also necessitates an independent certification authority who will come in and assess your security measures.
You might even want to insist on Common Criteria type certification!
The costs spiral upwards... out of proportion for most IoT objects.
And that is why we can't have security - not because it's difficult but because it's expensive.
I can see it now... chief of security thinks "How can I rid myself of this persistent Accenture salesperson with their thinly disguised sales pitch?"...
"Oh, we're bomb-proof, completely sorted, no requirement for any additional security services"
Brush-off successful, no sale for Accenture... company marked down by Accenture as being complacent in security.