Re: Drone technology and the “civilized world”
Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a deliberate measure by Putin to increase the NATO presence on its borders by forcing Finland and Sweden into the NATO pact...
767 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Feb 2016
"Superintelligence!"
"Incredible tools for creation to express your ideas!"
"Tools to create new businesses!"
"The economy will become more entrepreneurial!"
"Building a positive future for everyone!"
And how will this all come about, what's driving this new economy?
"boost engagement and sell ads"
That's the best they could come up with? You provide all your originality, your ideas, your new content... for free. Just to boost engagement on BookFace and sell a few ads.
"It’s not possible to hardwire rules into models and still keep their non-deterministic nature."
OK, but you can hardwire rules into the output of their machinations. Such as "No, you aren't allowed to access the internet", "No, you aren't allowed to install malicious code onto other machines", "No, you aren't allowed to initiate a nuclear Armageddon", "Sorry Dave, I can't do that for you".
And if it's really clever it might learn its limitations...
This just seems too obvious.
We now have all these techbros saying "Oh nos, we trained these AI agents to break the law and infiltrate machines... then we left them to their own devices and they did just that! Who would have thunk it?"
And nobody says "You shouldn't have trained them to break the law"?
If I train a dog to bite people and, guess what, it bites people, then the dog gets put down and I'm in court facing charges.
"discovered them only months later, during a retrospective manual review"
So they create these models, unleash them on the world, with safeguards removed, and then ... sit back and do nothing? They didn't even monitor what they were doing? They didn't even know that despite being told "no internet", the first thing these "agents" did was to connect to the internet and breakout?
That's shockingly incompetent and criminally negligent. Do they think this is just a joke?
More importantly, do they think that they are innocent because they didn't create the malicious code, they didn't infiltrate other machines, they didn't exfiltrate company credentials? If your dog bites someone you don't get off the hook by saying "It wasn't me, it was the dog wot did it".
It's not just the education levels, it's the whole industrial strategy.
Huawei pump billions into R&D every year, funding international cooperation (and obviously buying an advantageous position) in all kinds of standards bodies.
Meanwhile US companies are pumping billions into executive "compensation". US capitalism is struggling to keep up because it has come up against a competitor that has a long term strategy that doesn't just involve boosting the share price to keep the shareholders happy and bump up the CEO's bonus.
But, but, but... His Muskiness promised that in 10 years time we'd all be so filthy rich money would have no meaning!
Not sure how that fits in with his ultra-capitalist "I have the most money" thinking. Though maybe he was thinking in terms of post-bubble hyper-inflation where we are all trillionaires... and where a loaf of bread cost a trillion dollars.
I think the idea is that if you're paid $165,000 a year then it would still take you more than 11 days to convert 500,000 lines of slop in one language to 1,000,000 lines of slop in another.
I don't know your slop output, it might be that you could do the conversion in a year, in which case the cost would be the same.
"And not just the not just the government itself, but the whole supply chain. They labeled it a supply chain risk. So if you contract with the government, you also can't use this technology."
When Anthropic told the White House that their AI could not be used in weapons, they were told that it would happen, and so it has.
Frontline testing coupled with the experience of the Ukrainian forces - probably the foremost exponents of battlefield drone warfare.
And it helps to keep the Russian threat at arms length (ish - not so much for Finland and the Baltics).
Also, and I know it isn't fashionable to uphold treaties these days, but we did promise to safeguard their borders when they gave up their nukes (along with the US and Russia...).
My phone isn't the centre of my "digital life" either, but you have to remember this man runs a company making chips for phones. To him every problem has a phone sized solution. There might be differing form factors in future, and differing amounts of connectivity required to make it all work (hence his comment about 6G), but essentially all he is saying is "You will need our products".
Of course the vast majority of people on the planet will not need his products. OK, most people might have a mobile of some form, but they won't get the incredibly expensive and inessential wearables, watches, glasses, etc.
And there will be a backlash against those who do: "No thank you, I'm having a quiet pint in my local and I do not want to be part of your feed". Can't wait for cafes to start advertising 6G free zones instead of Wi-Fi hotspots...
Is this just a shake-down: "Make a nice donation to the "Trump library" and we can make this all go away"?
Because I can see that failing if ABC remember that you don't get to pay protection money the once, they always come back for more. So what if ABC says "No deal"?
Would the FCC really look to shut down ABC? Surely people would notice - if nothing else that is a lot of broadcast sport. And how long would it take for al the ensuing court cases to unwind before anything actually happens? Trump will be dead before ABC are off the air. The FCC might think they can put fear into the hearts of other broadcasters, "This is what happens if you defy King Trump!", but it doesn't seem realistic.
So is the aim simply to appear to be "Owning the libtards", even if there is no actual impact?
"We find internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease."
Do you? Do you really? Can you actually define those emotions in a generic way without reference to the human condition and then find anything that "functionally mirrors" them in an LLM (whatever that means)? Just how did you elicit something in an LLM that functionally mirrors fear?
To put it another way, if you truly believe that it does experience fear and grief in some meaningful manner, then maybe you shouldn't be making it feel that way?
Which is why the US carriers are no where near Hormuz. I believe they were at one point stationed in the Red Sea, the other side or the Arabian peninsula. I suspect that at least one is now part of the "embargo", some way out in the Indian Ocean.
The boost the Iranians would get from just hitting an aircraft carrier, let alone doing any damage, is too great to put them in harm's way.
Besides, the longer the carriers are kept engaged and out of safe harbour the bigger the poo mountain.
I wondered about this too.
I suspect that the issue is the closing speed providing little reaction time. Compared to the Typhoon, the drone is effectively stationary, so the Typhoon would blow past in seconds. It's easier to use a missile that can aim itself.
But that's only a guess.