Not hard to check
Use it at a testing centre and note the result on the samples sent off.
It shouldn't take long to see how closely they match.
84 posts • joined 5 Feb 2016
“violated federal law by stealing tech from partners, violating confidentiality agreements, recruiting employees to steal intellectual property upon leaving their jobs, and tapping university professors and researchers for documents on their work."
All standard and normal American business.
It's a pre prepared tool. So the effort required comes down to "not a lot".
Perhaps Microsoft would let them all join "teams" for free??
You can't log what they can't get to.
Wish I'd thought of this when I was getting stupid requests for a report on "dodgy sites" that were being accessed so a committee could ban them and look good.
Stupid ***ing management. If I knew it needed blocking it was blocked.
If "the likes of Comcast, AT&T and Verizon " don't want to be liable for everything on the Internet then why the *** are they so against net neutrality and being classed as common carriers?
The Lawers need to make up their f****** minds about which business the companies are in.
The USA doesn't seem to actually have a definition of "Internet".
This is why the whole argument is confusing to non-amercans. All the rules seem to be about cable connections. For TV. Or even a phone line. I heard it explained once and lost the plot.
What is so hard about paying for a data connection and expecting it to NOT be messed with to the advantage of the supplier?
I remember this from "old work" using RDP access. Management were so scared that a virus could infect the server. But the reality is the other way around.
By default the server had access to the local C drive.
I remember thinking "all this We can set a policy to verify the client is Secure is a waste of ****ing time."
(and I had to laugh when I heard that when Microsoft turned it on they locked out all the remote staff!)
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020