Re: Making Tax Farcical
because their dev team were all contractors and told they were subject to IR35 so left ...
2001 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Jan 2016
You're still using the vendor provided CPE
Its all terible with terible GUIs and security
BTs claim is based on false assumptions and awful testing
Firstly, Non-WiFi Interference is only really an issue in 2.4GHz, and 5GHz band has more available channels and supports ac speeds, which is why the devices they tested with Prefer 5GHz.
Secondly the major use of WiFi is not transfer between machines on the (W)LAN but to/from the internet. At which point the best IP throughput has to go to the virgin SH2AC , as everyone else is limited to the VDSL2 max of 80 Mbps unless you are lucky enough to be in a g.fast area.
Also the Test house they are using , there is no way the router would be in room A, with the way OR connects lines its far more likley to be in room B, and struggle to reach room A
Basically in this case SCOTUS rule on a point of law, not actually the case, they can rule that the AC misinterpreted the fedral copywrite law and an API structure is not a copywriteable.
Google are appealing the lower court's decision that the API is copywriteable, as if the API is not copywritable, then there use, wether fair or otherwise is not relevant.
if SCOTUS set the president that API listings are akin to dial plans, then the industry is safe.
If your talking mobile infrastructure well Huawei are the market leaders(28%), you dont want the Erricson(27%) kit (See O2 outage) the other major player is Nokia(23%) (the bit they didnt sell to Microsoft.)
so looks like were off to see the scandinavians again
ZTE (more worried about them) have a slice(13%), and Samsung have a scrape of the icing(3%)
Like one with 2x2 antenas, Samsung has had MIMO 2x2 antennas since the Galaxy S5.
and with a decent router, i regularly see speeds in excess of 800Mbps.
but seriously if Vf 4G can apparently crank up over 300Mbps if Openreach dont abandon G.fast and go full fibre, they are going to lose customers.
so in other words, they cant do it, but the other ISPs can....
The clause they're worrying about has some decent legal prescidence defining the terms obscene, threatening and abusive
Anyway, the main part that is not trying to drag us down a rabbit hole, YES the US.gov should crowd source actual speed data, and Its not that hard, and you can even pay someone to do it for you, or even access dta they are already collecting.
coerced consent is not legal under DPA2018 (GDPR)
Consent is presumed not to be freely given… if the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is dependent on the consent despite such consent not being necessary for such performance
Consent should not be regarded as freely given if the data subject has no genuine or free choice or is unable to refuse or withdraw consent without detriment
not sure aout the 73 million, but in troy's entire database ( 551,509,767 passwords)
password has appeared 3 533 661 times
pasword123 has appeared 114 262 times
123456 has appeared 22 390 492 times and is the most common one, followed by
123456789 at 74.8 million
qwerty at 37.5million
then password
then 111111 at 3 006 809 rounding out the top 5
password 123 comes in at #467
@Sir Runcible you had ample chance to vote the same as any EU citizen. If you chose not to take part in the EU Election like 65% of the country (a good 7% below average turnout) and elect MEPs who make one arm of the EU legislature.
The other two are the council, formed of the Member state governments (weighted by Population) that you vote for in general elections
and the commision, which is proposed by the council (that you vote for your represenative too) and confirmed by the Parliment(theat you get a say in)
So How are you not able to influence european decisions by voting?
oh and all decisions of the council need to be unanimous, so your elected representatives effectivley have a veto.
and dont get me started on the mess of how legislation actually gets through all three into EU law ....
the paperless 2020 money pot has already been raided and the cupboard is bare.
NPfIT had some of it the GDE program had its share, the WannaCry remediation took a load, and the W10 desktop licences took what was left. There is no money for replacing faxes, even to expand the fax to email gateways most trusts have.
Id is very definatley required, we have what is known as the NHS SmartCard (a certificate authentiction) that can onlyh be issued on production of three forms of ID one of which to be Photo, and the people that issue it are more pedantic than the passport office.