BT was set toll out fibre in 1990 but the PM at the time put a stop to it
https://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/how-the-uk-lost-the-broadband-race-in-1990-1224784
276 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jan 2016
My cousin was employed in what used to be Inland Revenue. In 1970 he was promoted and moved into a new office. There was a locked cupboard in the office and the key could not be found. He broke into the cupboard and found it stuffed with envelopes marked "On His Majesty's Service" and thousands of the Economy Return Labels similarly mared.
Note - he discovered that the Economy Return Label system was flawed because the gummed labels cost far more to produce than any envelope because of the difficulty of printing on gummed paper or adding gum to already printed paper.
On a long, residential course with a dozen other folk umpteen years ago our new instructor appeared without a tie and manglement quickly instructed him to find and wear a tie. However, it appeared that the local rules only said "a tie" and did not specify what sort of tie. There, for the rest of the course we all scoured local charity shops for the ugliest possible tie and our instructor happily wore them.
At a seaside resort in North Yorkshire in the 1980s BT were advertising their remote fire monitoring package - a fire would trigger an alert and all would be well. Such a shame that a few weeks later a fire broke out in the local exchange during the wee small hours and by the time anyone noticed the place had burned to the ground
I was in the RAF 1959-73 and for my final 3 years I was an instructor. There was an intensive 3 week course "Instructional Techniques" at RAF Upwood which gave all of us great confidence in our ability to teach our particular subjects. I believe that in later years the course gained national recognition
For 'O' level History 1955-59 our teacher was straight out of teacher training after National Service. His flawed technique was to spend the first year dictating all the notes for the subsequent 3 years. Of course most of us lost the notes before the start of year 2.
At work in the early 1980s we had a couple of Commodore Pets. We ran 6502 assembler programs which could do some impressive stuff, especially as the GPIB/IEEE488 routines were all encoded in ROM and just had to be called in order to control printers, etc. Of couse we were heavily reliant on Raeto West's comprehensive manual. We moved on to C using the Aztec compiler (remember .MAK files?), recommended to us because it was used by the CEGB in their nuclear power sites!
My TSB branch was in Kirkwall, to reach it involved a 2 hour ferry crossing and a 10 minute taxi ride (and the same for the return journey). Now the Kirkwall branch has closed and my nearest branches are in Wick & Thurso which would involve a further 2 hour ferry crossing and 10 minute taxi ride from Kirkwall. And, because of the ferry timings, it would probably involve at least one overnight stay in Kirkwall.
Fortunately I can check my TSB accounts online and use my local Post Office to withdraw cash.
Back in the 1980s the OU taught programming using HEKTOR, a simple computer that had a UHF modulator which you plugged into the aerial socket of a TV. The course began by using pure machine code then using a very, very simple assembler. Once you got the idea you were introduced to BASIC. That stood me in good stead at work when I encountered 6502 assembler (Commodore Pet and Raeto West)
Blaster Bates (remember him?) had one failure - a company that produced the overhead power lines for British Rail had huge furnaces to melt copper and other additives. One day there was a total power failure - backup didn't work - and molten copper solidified in the furnaces. Blaster Bates was brought in but his explosives made little impression on the solidified, quite soft copper. In the end I think that they had to send in people to physically chisel out umpteen tons of copper.
A large Government organisation commissioned a new, multi-storey building. It had several thousand ethernet sockets and umpteen telephone sockets. The contractor (not BT) for ethernet socket installation labelled every socket with a clear label (produced from a small hand-held printer). The contractor for the telephone sockets was BT who labelled all the sockets with hieroglyphics written with a stubby HB pencil...
From CrowdStrike's website https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/statement-on-windows-sensor-update
"CrowdStrike is actively working with customers impacted by a defect found in a single content update for Windows hosts. Mac and Linux hosts are not impacted. This is not a security incident or cyberattack. "
Mid 1980s and Commodore Pet was the machine of the day in my area. Armed with Raeto West's invaluable manual and a little 6502 assembler knowledge it was relatively easy to control external bits of kit using IEEE488 (aka GPIB) low level - TALK, UNTALK, LISTEN, UNLISTEN - commands. My tour de force was to link two Commodore Pets, each with its own IEE488 controller, using 6502 assembler
Back at work in the 1980s we got one of the first IBM PCs and a C compiler. The C compiler was "Aztec" and it was selected because (allegedly) the CEGB were using it in power station design! Memories of writing batch files to compile, link and create .exe files. And TSR (Terminate & Stay Resident) programs were not unknown.
In-house the PO and Fujitsu know or have access rights to know things about Horizon but in Scotland the Procurator Fiscal / staff / Prosecutors only know and only can know what the PO and or Horizon tell them. Unless the PF / Staff received documentary evidence that contradicts the instructions / witness statements they received how on earth are they to know that Horizon was riddled with errors and the PO / F staff have lied to cover up these problems?
I suspect that the person writing this about the process in Scotland knows v. little about how legal proceedings work.
I'm assuming that in Scotland (just like in England & Wales) the Prosecutor is under a duty to disclose to the defence documentary evidence that is adverse to the Prosecutor's case. Down south the PO of course had such material, but north of the border the PF will only have it if the PO had provided it. Knowing the PO as we now do, it probably didn't.
I doubt that the PF or its staff or Prosecutors were told about the Horizon defects.
In 1973 I started work in a government office that had a "copier" which used liquids (no idea what they were) and you had to use barrier cream before attempting to use the machine. It produced copies that were "not bad". Nowadays the unions would scream blue murder about H&S!