Re: Guess what tune is going through my head?
It's cold outside
There's no kind of atmosphere ...
1898 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Oct 2015
Maybe it's just me, but I would be extremely leery of trying ransomware against billionaire tech companies. Surely, at some point, they start using cutouts to employ counter-criminals, possibly (and hopefully) including a wet works team who leave the malware writers in pieces at the bottom of a river.
It would be a lot easier to detect nefarious traffic, however, if the traffic were not already encrypted.
We're moving to the point that deep-packet inspection at the edge of the consumer network is going to be a necessity. Basically, each home's router/firewall will also need to act as a Web proxy configured to decrypt and inspect all traffic passing through it to search for malware, as is currently common on enterprise networks. That should be a fun exercise.
What is new here is the idea that organisational settings can prod employees into scheduling meetings that allow for breaks automatically. The counter-argument is that it is the human that should tell the calendar the time of the meeting, not vice versa.
There are always those managers who insist that a meeting should run right up until the scheduled end time and refuse to turn people loose, despite the lack of productive conversation occurring. Maybe this feature will help deal with those people.
Being able to reply to specific messages sounds great; it's remarkable how few chat programs implement it.
Finally, I would love to see a feature to automatically squelch notifications from new chats when the user is actively chatting with someone already. It could be called Take a Fucking Number mode.
I think you mean "no contract provisions that are prohibited by law can be legally enforced." All an employee has to do to fight those provisions is find a lawyer who will take the case and then, of course, come up with the money to pay said lawyer and hope that the lawyer is good enough and the case strong enough that the complainant wins because the consequences for losing are being on the hook for very steep legal fees and possible damages from a countersuit. Strangely, relatively few people are willing to go through that process.
[citation needed]
I did a quick DDG search, and the biggest anti-Fauci hit piece comes from noted right-wing propaganda outlet AIER. Articles from The Washington Post and LA Times indicate that Fauci was more willing to listen to AIDS activists than older scientists at the NIH and was instrumental in AIDS vaccine research and global AIDS outreach programs.
Happy Zorin user here. I think the Zorin team have done a bang-up job creating a slick UI that is both more consistent than actual Windows 10 and less amateurish in appearance than many other Linux desktop environments. I agree with the poster above, however, that WINE is kludgy and requires a serious commitment to running Windows-only applications in Linux.
"Communication based on respect is a lost art"
I think it's always been a little dodgy on the Internet, tbh. I recall highly contentious flamewars on Usenet back in the day. Possibly there is a difference between greybeards who perceive that style of communication as being natural and normal and a younger generation who don't. Even on this comment board, you can see a schism between people who think that civil communication is valuable and the people who think those people are a bunch of fucking pussy snowflakes.
"It looks like you're having a heart attack. Would you like help with that?"
Hmm, upon consideration, that could be pretty cool, especially if it dialed 911 for you. Unfortunately, it will probably be more like:
"It looks like you're having a heart attack. Would you like to order some nitroglycerin pills?"
Look, AC, I don't understand quantum physics, but I do understand English. From a logical perspective, you haven't proven anything. Your words are incoherent gibberish, which suggests but does not prove that your thoughts are also gibberish.
For example, this paragraph is literally meaningless:
"So either a) magnetic directly pushes against gravity as if they're not fundamental forces, or b) light (or your photons) and or matter, is internalizing the two forces without being ripped apart somehow, or c) magnetic is countering the compression of space time.... to stretch it, in some sort of blah blah blah way...."
And no, to forestall your immediate response, the problem is not my lack of understanding; the problem is that you are not explaining whatever you are trying to say in a comprehensible fashion.
"*I* *AM* *NOT* *AN* *ENGINEER*."
Really? You certainly seem to have the personality of one (kidding, guys, I'm kidding--really).
More seriously, you seem to have defined "IT" very narrowly and "software engineering" very broadly. Someone on this very comment board made the point some time ago that many programmers couldn't really be said to be software engineers, in the sense that many programmers don't follow scientific principles when designing their code, whatever that may entail. I believe the same person may have made the point that, strictly speaking, there's no such thing as "software engineering," but I will let other commentards weigh in on that point. Conversely, many IT practitioners who would not consider themselves programmers or software engineers do in fact perform programming tasks, e.g. writing scripts (aka programs) in bash, Powershell, or Python. I would therefore argue that the line between "software engineer" and "IT person" is much blurrier than you propose.
All that said, I would agree that there has been title inflation in the technology field and that people will tack the name "engineer" onto any role that seems vaguely technical (much like the recent abomination "Field CTO") to give it inflated merit.
I would also suggest that you lay in a supply of dried frog pills . . . you appear to need them.
"IT/ICT ****IS***** Office Skills."
Wrong. In fact, so wrong as to be offensive. You may, like many engineers, look down your nose at IT support and operations staff, but the fact is that we do much more than type things into Word documents. Here are just a few of the things I have explained to "senior" developers over the years:
* Why using source control is a good idea, even for pre-release code (after said developer's hard drive died, costing him a month of work)
* How to use source control, like, at all
* How file system permissions work
* What a virtual machine is
* What a container is
* Why it's not a good idea to include passwords in plain text in configuration files
* How DNS works
* How networking works
* Load balancing
* High availability
* Latency
(Note to the moderators: look how good I'm being. I didn't swear once or insult this person, even though he comes across as a colossally condescending fucking toolbag.
...
Dammit.)
That depends on where you work. If you work for a dedicated software development or engineering house, you're correct: IT are the people who the developers shit on regularly. If you work for a company that makes or does something else, e.g. banking or manufacturing, IT is basically anything computer-related, whether programming, desktop support, or system administration.
From a consumer perspective, their USP was reliable, predictable service and charges with a minimum of fuss compared to a conventional taxi. Hailing an Uber was a revelation in simplicity compared to getting a taxi. Taxi firms have somewhat risen to the challenge, but the experience of getting an Uber or Lyft is still superior to getting a conventional cab. Ironically, Uber could probably have charged more for their service and turned a profit just on the basis of working better than regular cabs.
I both agree and disagree with codejunky, which is an awkward position to be in. I agree that Uber and Lyft have forced the traditional taxi firms to raise their game and that the taxi firms had benefited from decades of government-mandated monopoly that Uber and Lyft disrupted, to the universal benefit of the consumer. Where I disagree is that Uber and Lyft's gross abuse of their drivers is the only way forward. If the business model is truly effective, then they can pay their drivers a living wage and benefits.
As a T-Mobile customer myself, all I can say is that the other networks seem to be worse, and all the competition has been gobbled up, so choices are few and far between. Of the major carriers, T-Mobile seems to have the best customer service. Also, when you buy a phone from T-Mobile, there's no contract: you can choose to pay for the phone on an installment plan, and if you leave T-Mobile, you obviously owe the remainder of the phone cost, but there's no penalty for early departure, and it's really straightforward to register a phone you bought separately. I'm definitely not saying this move doesn't suck or that I'm not disappointed in T-Mobile, mind you.
My last post was whacked. Let's see if this edit is accepted:
Biden was handed a total dog's breakfast on all fronts by the corrupt and incompetent former administration, so he may be a little busy for press conferences right now. You'll note that the Biden administration has been rapidly executing on a series of thoughtful and well-planned policies, and that takes real work, as opposed to simply denying that problems exist and heading off to golf or holding ego-inflating rallies.
Watch those goalposts move! You started with baseless ad hominem and conspiracy-mongering and then moved onto, remarkably, something resembling a valid and coherent point about Harris' past record as AG. How those two things are in any way related is completely unclear, unfortunately. If you want to criticize Harris based on her record as AG, go for it. Buying into the lunatic fringe conspiracy theories about how Biden is Harris' puppet (and how she herself the puppet of ... whom, exactly?) does your credibility no favors.
A friend of mine just got back into development after years of teaching high school and is getting back up to speed on coding Web applications. I suspect his focus will be on getting his code to work at all. The application he's writing might net him a small paycheck, but his focus is going to be on nailing down future employment opportunities. I suspect that the odds of him ruthlessly sanitizing his inputs according to this model are slim. Not saying that he's not to be held accountable for secure coding, but what are the new programmers (or old, set-in-their-ways, programmers) to do? What's being described sounds like a lot of hard, painstaking work of the sort that management won't care about when it gets in the way of adding features or hitting release targets. I know that the readership of El Reg are literally the best programmers on Earth (in their own minds, at least), so what's the answer, guys?