Re: Next up . . .
I am not a number, I am a free man!
2670 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Oct 2015
IANAL, and news is still hard to find, but per Reddit (I know, I know), the "hackers" jammed on-board Wifi and substituted a landing page designed to harvest users' credentials, which could open the perpetrators up to additional fraud charges, plus I'm led to understand that the FAA takes a fairly dim view of interfering with airplane operations. Official news seems to be pending investigation, so the whole event could also be overblown.
I have tried using Copilot within Microsoft's own products to do things like fix formatting throughout a document, and my experience is that it will claim that it's done something that it clearly has not, or it will execute poorly. By contrast, Claude will quickly do the right thing (again, in my experience--put down the torches and pitchforks, please). I can't even imagine using Copilot for coding: best case, you get nothing; worst case, you get something worse. I guess if you're a Microsoft engineer trying to look busy, an agentic coding loop in Copilot could be very helpful; otherwise, one can only imagine what kind of crap you'd wind up with. 0_0
Open "Edit Group Policy" (gpedit.msc)
Expand Computer Configuration
Expand Administrative Templates
Expand System
Click Device Installation
Double click "Prevent automatic download of applications associated with device metadata" in the panel on the right.
Click Enable
Click Apply
Click OK
I have an older LG monitor, and was unpleasantly surprised to find new software being installed. In addition to the steps above, I removed the LG Monitor Installer application as well.
Does this mean that the dark matter in the universe is actually dense dark chocolate and that we're all microscopic ingredients in a vast confectionery? It sounds great . . . until you envision who the Cosmic Baker is baking for. The end of the Universe is nigh once the baking process is complete! Your best hope is to be eaten first! Ia! Shub Niggurath! Ia! Ia!
Given how conservative most DBAs are and how important SQL databases are to the applications they service, stability is paramount. One also imagines that SQL Server is a mature product and that any new "features" would be a threat to stability. Microsoft can sit back and let the licensing and support dollars flow in.
I figured the Flatpak haters and systemd haters would be in the same camp, so Flatpak may as well become dependent on systemd. For myself, I'm pretty neutral on systemd, but I'm generally opposed to Flatpak and Snap for the reason that their packages tend to be so huge compared to a native installation. Perhaps Flatpak-NG will have smaller packages, which would be a worthwhile improvement.
The first article linked to in the article above contains more technical information. It's still well above my head, but it contains useful visual aids which helped me understand a bit better what's being done.
This article appears to be the actual technical paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.15261.
I was probably one of the last people to get a $75 Lifetime Pass, and I'm certainly not going to argue about value for that money. The big problem I see with Plex is that they're trying to push people into Plex as a streaming service, promoting that capability over accessing one's own library. There's no ad-free tier, from what I can tell, so if you've paid for a subscription or lifetime pass, you still see ads, which completely kills the appeal for me.
I expect that The Netherlands is a higher-trust culture where people are more likely to assist the police because the police are less likely to abuse their authority. Contrast that situation with, say, the United States . . .
In the context of this campaign, I'm curious about how the police got the pictures of the suspected scammers.
Sure, if your phone is otherwise compromised by spyware, or if someone with sufficient resources has physical access to it, you're pretty screwed. In the context of the Polish messaging app, the government is trying to block a particular threat vector, that of phishing via third-party contacts. One expects they can also block the notification vector highlighted in the Forbes article by not allowing notifications containing message data to be displayed by the OS. Can the OS then be hardened enough to prevent 0-click exploits and data capture, along with forensic penetration?
I'm frankly astonished that no government has built a hardened mobile OS version to provide mobile communication capabilities with much greater security. Or maybe they have, and it's classified.
I would add a couple of points:
1) When I've tried to disable ad-blocking on El Reg, it feels like my eyeballs are being raped. The banners and interstitials plastered all over the place are incredibly intrusive. I would be much happier just paying a subscription.
2) Web advertising isn't a fair transaction. My personal information is harvested and resold to parties with whom I have no relationship, entirely without my consent. Since I'm not given a choice in the nature and cost of the transaction, I choose not to engage in it.