* Posts by Nimby

273 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Sep 2015

Page:

Microsoft boffins think VR visions will rival drugs by 2027

Nimby

Eh?

My head hurts. To me the only thought-provoking piece of that whole line of drivel is, "Has Microsoft's choice to staff an all-female group of futurists to pronounce such inexpert tripe a) helped empower women, or b) furthered gender discrimination in tech?"

The ploy would have been a brilliant one ... if the "futurists" had said anything brilliant. Instead I just see a lot of hanging rope followed by a long awkward silence. :(

Though it might explain why MS keeps making Windows worse instead of better if this is how they brainstorm.

Qualcomm, Microsoft plot ARM Snapdragon-powered Windows 10 PCs, tablets, phones

Nimby
Angel

When a phone is not a phone...

On the other hand, on the off chance that Microsoft can finally get that whole emulation thing to work correctly, and one really CAN install and use all of their favorite old software packages, it could finally fill the gap I've personally been waiting for ever since the smartphone killed the PDA: A phone that can actually run real software. Crappy apps just don't cut the cake.

I expected this gap to be filled years ago with the Intel Atom, but someone always killed off every project that tried.

Maybe now we'll see the gap filled from the other direction, with emulation.

I doubt it. But ... maybe.

Nimby
FAIL

1 PRINT "EPIC FAIL"; 2 GOTO 1

This reminds me of so many failures. Such as with the DEC Alpha. MS made a version of NT that actually ran the processor quite well. Fat lot of good it did anyone, considering MS couldn't emulate x86 to make any software work on it. Most install programs could not even complete the installation process. Of the few x86 software packages that could be installed, most had weird bugs or constant crashes. And if you asked the 3rd party software vendors when they would fix their software to run on the DEC Alpha CPU, you would get inane responses like, "We will support it when Microsoft does."

Not much later you had the Windows ME debacle where MS proved they couldn't even handle the move from 16-bit to 32-bit x86 correctly. And so on up to Windows RT, yet another epic fail on MS's part.

Now we're expected to believe that we can completely ignore the last decade of epic failures on MS's part to handle this kind of experience? That for the first time, ever, MS will actually let us run our same-old software and hardware without flaw? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you...

Sysadmin figures out dating agency worker lied in his profile

Nimby
Devil

Reality can be as sad as fiction.

This reminds me of the old User Friendly strip about pressing any key.

http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030128

Apple admits the iPhone 6 Plus has 'Touch Disease'

Nimby
Trollface

It just works*.

*=Except for when it doesn't.

Seriously, what Apple phone generation hasn't had a "gate" involving design or quality control issues?

If it happens once, fine, it's a fluke. But if it happens every single generation, then maybe you should fire your engineers and start over from scratch or something.

Good thing customers are paying well over double the cost of an equivalent device (and losing out on all sorts of innovative technology that has been used in other manufacturers for six months, a year, and sometimes even more) for a product that is built so well. I'd hate to think that Apple customers might have spent all of that extra money for no good reason or something.

Microsoft's development platform today: What you need to know

Nimby
Facepalm

Welcome to the Microsoft Multiplatform Ranch!

Hello Microsoft. This is the barn door. See how you left it open for so long while you spent all of that time building, tearing down, and rebuilding all of your teeny-tiny little fenced-in paddocks? Do you see any horses still milling about? Do you see any cows? Pigs? Chickens? Nope. All wandered off YEARS ago to greener pastures.

If you wanted people to use you for multiplatform, then you probably should have, you know, done something useful about that. At least one decade ago when you were already losing those sales in droves. Maybe two, if you were paying any attention at all. Three would have actually been innovating.

But good luck catching some new horses. I'm sure there must be some still wandering the wilds that you can lure in. What's that? You have a sugar cube. Yeah. I'm sure that'll do the trick.

By the way, that barn door of yours is still open...

The solution to security breaches? Kill the human middleware

Nimby
Devil

"You need to assume a breach"

The part that truly amazes me is that not once have I heard the phrases "encrypted", "hashed", "salted", or "split into DBs stored on separate servers".

And yet this is where most companies are failing right now. Customer data should not be stored as a one-slurp Candyland. Even seemingly inconsequential data should a) still be encrypted and b) split within reason into separate DBs so that even once slurped and cracked, all you have is a list of nameless home addresses, or a list of first names only.

PITA? Absolutely. For both you and the hacker. "You need to assume a breach!" Make your data as useless as possible to any single attack. And make them work hard to decrypt it just to find out!

Congratulations on hacking one of our servers! Too bad all you got was this lousy t-shirt. Nya nya!

British banks chuck smartphone apps out of Windows

Nimby

U is for Uniplatform.

(As in only one platform.)

Seriously, MS is great at giving the world lots of things that don't meed developer needs or that we don't want. (C#, Silverlight, .NET to name a few.) I'm STILL waiting for a proper MS standards-adhering C++ compiler, thanks.

It's a shame that they also happen to give us the few basic necessities that a lot of people do need. (Windows and Office, mostly.) So they're never really going to learn the lesson that they should actually listen to their customers. Oh well.

What I don't get is what is so hard about porting 100 lines of code to various languages/app stores that companies drop their support of X, Y, or Z? Because interns are so hard to find?

Secretions on your phone reveal your secrets

Nimby
FAIL

Bah. Whatever.

I'm a --- who takes a low dose of --- because I have negative reactions to ---. I eat pretty darn healthy and I try to exercise regularly. (Including an under-desk bicycle.) Why would I give a flying fairy fart who can mine that from swabbing my phone for vague and pointless medical information? You don't need a secret swab of my fingerly juices. Just pay some intern twenty bucks to stack me for a day and you'll know that much about My Secret Identity. Bah. Whatever. The fact that I still use a Nokia C6 with the Symbian revamp instead of Apple or Google because it a) works better and b) is less likely to be hacked and c) still has great battery life is probably a heck of a lot more interesting than how many vegetables I eat in a day. :\

CIOs: VDI? Maybe, just maybe, it really will be different this time...

Nimby
Stop

No! Just ... no.

"If they decide that now you really can’t tell the difference..."

It's like asking anything that starts with, "If wishes were horses..." It doesn't matter what the question is if it starts with an impossible premise. Users. Can. Tell.

Heck, I haven't even seen a company switch from PBX to VoIP without bringing their network to its knees and requiring a massive expensive overhaul to defeat the purpose of their "cost-saving" effort. And that's just audio, highly compressed. Now multiply that by EVERYTHING. It has never gone smoothly, and it will never go smoothly, and anyone who tells you otherwise is probably trying to sell you something. Do not buy.

Apple drops dongle prices to make USB-C upgrade affordable

Nimby

Re: How generous

I know every any Apple device ever has come with an extreme markup beyond sane value, but for some reason people pay it and Apple goes on. But now Apple is dropping the price of a $40 adapter to $20 when you can buy the same thing for $5 from a non-Apple brand? To plug stuff (like their own latest phone) into their laptop worth thousands? A laptop that doesn't already come with a few, when they know full well everyone will need at least one (for their phone). Must Love Apple.

I don't think I've laughed this hard for months.

Accessories to crime: Facial recog defeated by wacky paper glasses

Nimby
Thumb Down

Department of the Obvious

Wow. I am shocked. Utterly, utterly, flabbergasted. I will never see life in the same way again.

Or ... not.

So a study finds that wearing ridiculous glasses fools some face recognition software. Software that literally cannot even hold up to a simple smile. (As evinced by all of the frowny-faced passport photos out there these days.) Next thing you know they'll tell you that growing a beard or even trimming your eyebrows (or not if you already do) might also throw off facial recognition software.

And I will be amazed. Astonished. Truly.

Why Apple's adaptive Touch Bar will flop

Nimby
FAIL

Prepare to be Apple-simulated. Resistance is fruit-ile.

There's a lot that I could say ... but I won't. Instead I will jump to the one thing that I do not get: Why REPLACE the top F-key strip? They could have just put their touchy-no-feely strip anywhere and KEPT the F-keys. That would have made sense to me. And been useful. Plenty of 3rd party keyboards do this to add extra features, buttons, etc. On the top. On the left. Wherever. And that works just fine.

I hate it when someone has the "bright" idea to take away my physical keys. (Or just as bad, to MOVE them.) Stop messing with my physical keys already! I have decades of muscle memory to a long-established layout. Mess with it and I instantly have an 80% drop in interest in your product.

Not to mention, you can't FEEL if you fat-fingered a flat surface. Welcome to Hunt And Peck By Design. Why is everyone lately so obsessed with bringing everything in the minus column of smartphones to my computer? It's not innovation. It's annoying!

Possible reprieve for the venerable A-10 Warthog

Nimby

Team player in a grunge band

As a former zoomie, I have to say that not everyone in the USAF is thoroughly obsessed with shiny shiny, or even fast-faster-fastest. I'm not a fan of either the F-35 or the F-22. But I loves me some Warthog. My top 3 jets would be the F-16, the A-10, and the SR-71. So I'm really excited to hear that the A-10 just may live on for a while longer. (I still wish we had updated the SR-71s with hydrogen pulse jets.)

So redesign the A-10 engines to be even quieter (and more fuel efficient). Update the electronics and countermeasures. Even paint her with some radar-diffracting skittles if you have to make her shinier. Give her some purple hair. Something. Anything. But don't retire her.

I think, sadly, we have forgotten that the key to success is that no one is a "one man army". Divide labor intelligently to the people who can get the job done right. Somewhere along the way, a lot of brass today seem to have completely lost their common sense.

Or maybe I'm just a curmudgeonly luddite who doesn't like fixing something that isn't broken. ;) And if there's one plane that isn't broken, it's the A-10. The most she needs is some spit and polish and she'll be better than new.

Password1? You're so random. By which we mean not random at all - UK.gov

Nimby
Devil

Random and Corwin drove to Amber

The problems with 2FA have already been covered. (AKA besides the fact that not everyone has a smartphone, when was the last week you made it through that didn't read a headline, "phone cloned", "Android / iOS hole found", etc.?) Frankly, and with good reason, I trust my PC more than I do my phone!

Likewise a bad idea in security is the finger print. Even if they were truly unique (which they are not) most scanners are still beaten by a gummy bear, with or without involving a printer. I'm not sure about retinal scanners, but then I don't see many of those kicking around. And even if we could go straight to DNA, I'm betting most systems that could be made to fit into something small enough to use would be flummoxed by family members. (Not to mention all those pins and needles and hazmat concerns.) So anything biometric is out. (And yet companies still do try.)

Frankly, it's Steam that has some of the best solutions that I've seen combined. As simple as a password ... but protected by sanity checks such as location and device. Chances are pretty low that I would travel continents to log in from Estonia, at 3 in the morning, from a device that I have never used before. And if it really is me because I really went on a vacation, I just have to get my confirmation code from a second factor of my choosing. It's a much more sane solution that covers a majority of situations well, and is customizable to cover the rest.

Nimby
Joke

Random lives in a House and does a lot of Publishing

"It's not exactly an algorithm, but I find that random drunken ramblings sampled at 3 AM in a bar is a good starting point for creating strong passwords."

For creating strong passwords ... or for creating new Australian colloquialisms to rival the likes of "flat out like a lizard drinking" and "she'll be apples".

But to vaguely waver back towards seriousness for a moment, it's the old adage that "anything is better than nothing". Whatever system you have works, so long as you have a system, and you use it.

Random drunken ramblings, reverse typing, random creature names from an AD&D Monstrous Manual and the page number they came from, pig latin, inverted ASCII, R3PL4C1N6 letters with digits (with or without full leetspeak), or even rousing games of Bingo and Battleship can all provide wonderfully difficult passwords to crack.

Is this the worst Blockchain idea you've ever heard?

Nimby
Devil

Blockchain for IoT Whitelist

One can ALWAYS come up with something WORSE. (And then crowdfund it to skim 25% off the top.) How about, for 1 Bitcoin one can register worldwide their IoT control server in the cloud in a whitelist of "guaranteed to not be hacked" devices with Blockchain-proven security? (But how does one come up with a name for something so awful?)

Not to be confused with the "2 Convenient App-As-A-Service" that you can set up on any trusted cloud server of your choice to automatically receive and enter the second part of your 2-factor authorizations for you. Because everyone knows that 2-factor authorization is even safer when it's done on the cloud.

EU legal eagle: Euro court should review Intel's €1.6bn fine

Nimby

Judge not, lest ye be judged

Cyrix = Compatibility problems and lack of determination saw them quit the game early of their own accord / on their own failures. They might have done well for themselves ... if they had not given up so easily.

Transmeta = Runs their proprietary instruction set, that no one uses. So emulates any other instruction sets, such as x86. Results always performed horribly on the first iteration of any code as it needed translating. This made their performance "unreliable" at best and highly unpredictable at worst. They would have had great potential had they ever done straight x86. Or had they improved their translation speeds.

Via = Cheap crap that was often buggy. Did the IT industry a big favor by giving up as it cut tech support overhead significantly to no longer have them ending up in supply chains. Many companies started blacklisting them simply because of the support costs of running Via chips, mobos, or graphics.

AMD = (Usually) good tech, but lousy management. Numerous times they held potential ... but their success always inspires them to shoot themselves in the foot. For example, when they held a significant performance crown over Intel (poor Prescott) they ____ on their best mobo chipset manufacturer (nVidia) by buying AMD and turning their epic success into a major nosedive by alienating a significant gaming segment. It's the most extreme example, but is typical of their inability to understand their own place in the market and build on that instead of _____ on it.

Intel = Big, bulky, Chipzilla. Often taking risks and making mistakes, has the business strength to survive them. By default the defacto standard of x86 simply by merit of surviving the market and adapting when needed. (Even if that adaptation is sometimes rather slow to happen.)

The market was not a result of Intel giving discounts to bulk buyers. (Seriously, who does not expect to pay less per part when buying in bulk, be it in the form of initial price or in rebates?)

The market was simply a result of the various natures of the players involved. Intel won simply because they did not give up, and because they knew when to grab onto something, and when to let it go.

As Kenny Rogers sang,

"Every gambler knows

That the secret to survivin'

Is knowin' what to throw away

And knowin' what to keep

'Cause every hand's a winner

And every hand's a loser

And the best that you can hope for is to die

in your sleep."

PC sales sinking almost as fast as Donald Trump's poll numbers

Nimby

When good enough is ... finally good enough.

Seriously, who needs a 20 core 40GHz processor, 16PB hard drive, etc. to run Word and surf the internet? 99.99% of businesses and 95% of home users have more than what they need and will only upgrade when their PSU fails 6 years later. The other 5% are mostly gamers.

Whoever needed a phone has one. And we're tired of Angry Birds by now.

Whoever needed a tablet has one. And we weren't really all that fascinated by Angry Birds being larger and pixelated.

Frankly, if anyone wants to push new steel, they really should invest much more heavily in making new games. It's about the only reason people will actually upgrade hardware any time before it keels over dead. Intel, AMD, Dell, Asus, Apple, Google, Nokia, etc. should start sponsoring Plants Vs Zombies Super Bowl Bash, Call of Duty 69, the Grand Theft Auto: Hotter Coffee mod, and the Pokemon Middle-Of-A-Busy-Intersection Detection Toolkit if they want people to actually buy their latest Yet Another Gadget We Already Own To Do Things We Got Bored Of.

Or put simply, "It's all about the content, baby!"

That or Samsung had the right idea: Make it break sooner and try to take other devices with it!

Virtual reality is actually made of smartphones

Nimby
FAIL

Factual? Fictional? Factitious? F___!

Wow. I mean not every article can be a winner, but ... yikes! I think about the only factually correct part of that article is that Steve Jobs is dead.

Hidden somewhere deep inside behind a lot of misinformation is the idea that the economy of scale of manufacturing our cellphones in general (not smartphones, and certainly not the iPhone) has made the components of various VR headsets (such as small batteries, small screens, ARM-based processors, multi-axis accelerometers, embedded cameras, etc.) affordable so that we can have a cheap PlayStation VR instead of an ever-inflating Oculus Rift. (Although I dare say even that is debatable as Sony already had most of that covered without phones being involved.)

Which I think was just said in one paragraph, without misinformation. Not exactly worthy of an article in itself.

Maybe if someone mixes in some price comparison and economy maths to be involved to explain the current market and sense (or lack thereof) to it.

Not even a thread to hang by to correlate any of it the aforementioned dead dude.

And definitely not an article worthy of the usual (if admittedly rather lax) standards of Vulture Central. It leaves me wondering if I'm about to see an article pulled. And if the author will remain employed. Either of which are far more interesting than the contents of that article!

BlackBerry's turnaround stalls

Nimby

Blackwhatnow?

BlackBerry is still alive? For some reason I had thought they were already dead and buried. Next thing you'll tell me Palm is still making PDAs, pagers are making a comeback, and a new line of Polaroid cameras is ready to break us out of our digital doldrums.

Stick your finger in another Pi: Titchy-puter now has touchscreen

Nimby

Re: Poor resolution

The resolution does seem ... ridiculously poor. In a world where 5 inch phones now regularly exceed full 1080p reso natively, that RPi 7 inch screen is not something I would put my money into. Many years ago maybe, but not today.

However that does bring up an interesting idea for a RPi case: A real 7in touch screen (with at least 1080p resolution) in a case with a battery. Just plug in your RPi board and instant tablet! That might be a fun waste of money. Instead of an iThing I could have a piThing, complete with official (alternative) fruity logo on the case. :D

But definitely not with this paticular 7 inch blunder. The idea is great. The resolution ... not so much.

The remote control from HELL: Driverless cars slam on brakes for LASER POINTER

Nimby
Thumb Up

Re: Not so different from a conventional car then

Right. Why even bother with the laser pointer? Hit a car driver with a flashlight. (Or if that's not techie enough for anyone, amp it up to one of those DIY 1000w LED flashlights on the interwebs.)

The good news is that driverless car does stop. Human drivers would probably just blink and squint and keep on driving.

As for the technical solution, there's simple and there's complex. Simple is redundancy. Lidar, radar, sonar, thermal Imaging, IR Imaging, blah blah ad infinitum. The more systems that have to agree in order to take action, the more outliers can be logged and ignored.

Complex is really not all that complex either, it's just smarter algorithms. Time-shift an event to confirm its validity. Things don't appear out of nowhere. A spoofed wall of humans would have had to walk in from somewhere.

Sure, adding more "security" into the Lidar wouldn't be such a bad idea either. These are all things that can be improved as the technology advances.

But at the end of the day, the worst-case scenario of this alleged hack (I can't even call it a real one, it's just so ... obvious) is that the car does the Safe Thing. When blinded or confused, it stops. I can't think of a better safety protocol than that. If that means "attacking" driverless cars is an easy DoS then maybe learning how to drive is still relevent to life. **shrug** Manual override sounds like it will always be a handy feature to have. And so, apparently, will patience.

Page: