point of sales
while putting some ms garbage into the aws bucket is not a bad idea at all
I ask myself when they start using the world largest pos - amazon.com
oĺeary is moving into the sixties isn t it ?
12 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Aug 2015
....and here I am curious about the upcoming nvme storage/mem tech. x86 arch will at best be suboptimal compared to other processor architectures (sparc).
Unfortunately intel has such market power in the meantime - they will deliver optimised/specialised processors as well.
Still running in circles: what was j.schwartz role in those days ?
well, if you define cloud as big dc with a lot of hw etc - agreed. but thats , at least to my experience , not the case. companies are asking for the XaaS concept. they want to keep their data inhouse, keep their hands on....imagine having a phone number...please stay in the line....and your trucks are piling up...hey, you will need a pint or two in the evening.
not such a big deal for nutanix. kvm is already running on power systems. acropolis is more or less a customization plus adapted distributed file system. would be a nice niche in the hci market (btw: happy to see non-x86/64 processors alive like power,sparc. monoculture is never a good option).
remains the question of how to market, how to get nutanix to the real enterprise segment ?
well - wishful thinking
- the big guys are in muddy waters
--- emc/dell => many questions about productlines
--- netapp => revenue horribly declining
--- HP(E) => no margins, (free hw delivery bc of lousy data reduction values)
if you look at the market share numbers "others" is the growth value in it.
yes, market consolidation will happen --- but not now.
its the economy.stupid.
- analysts just extrapolate the IT production function.
- advantages of the cloud compute model are already worked-in in new products
- the new generation of start-ups got the IP and get the same resources for their hw.
- remains a certain cost advantage for the bigX based on size, but not that big (10% ? )
- well, balancing that with the risk (for your enterprise IT) completely loosing control of your assets (data, operations) ....Hmmm....I would not prefer to have a seat in the board ...
- the cloud is an option, not more, not less
-
my 2cnts
- two kind of storage types will remain : local a/o remote
- decision differentiator is data security a/o latency
- san/nas/b2d will merge ( bad for netapp )
- bu/restore/archive will be a data service
- incumbents: ibm will leave the table, hp has nothing beyond 3par, netapp sinking ship
- remaining: emc (best management), hds (best engineers)
- new players: tegile / kaminario / oracle(not new but investing...)
- market will be divided by 4- 6 players , as it was 3y ago
- remote storage players (google/azur/aws/...) will collapse (=the next crash ) - one or two remain
the substitution process will be evolutionary and in most cases run by life cycle considerations.
VSI/VDI/OLTP/DSS clear thing. I am not so sure about backup/archive - media break as an insurance for your software defined storage (what are the flash solutions at the end of the day) is an argument---
Well, I would rename IEMs into IEMs -infrastructure enabling machines- ;-)
I agree certain jobs will diminish. But industrialization is the horse we all are riding on – let it run, dude.
Extrapolation forgets
-changing incentives for the involved parties over time
-the demand side of the equation
Taking into consideration the ongoing digitalisation of all our life/business sectors we are just in front of a new and big wave of IT services which couldn't be realized in old school infrastructure.
- all flash data centre - would save energy, right ?
- it consolidates storage arrays, no extra arrays for dev,qa etc because of the IOPS headroom
- you only need to address geo risk and media breakline redundancy
- a flash unit is at least !!! 3.3 times more cost effective to store tier1 data (av.data reduction factor 5, 1K$ per 1TB eMLC vs 650$ 15k 0.6TB HDD)
- economics and investment life cycle set the pace