Unintended...
Its the automatic updater. That's clearly "using"...
176 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jul 2007
To the question of who should maintain open source, I wonder if there should be a Professor of Linux, with a lab and postgrad students laboring on documentation or bug fixes?
Universities are good at patching together funding and seeking grants. I always assumed that Universities would jump at the chance to have something to work on that actually helped train their students to do something useful. So what do Universities actually do?!
> You need the lawyer to notarise their receipt of the hard copy.
There should be a service provided by your local law enforcement to timestamp compromising details.
The law should say that no-one can be accused of mishandling information posted to the service.
Law enforcement gets to read and aggregate the submissions.
Submissions should be anonymous, but the submitter should be able to prove they were the source.
In a court case the submitter can use the information as mitigating evidence, depending on how clear and relevant it was.
> Why not telling women they should have babies and let their fathers stay home and care for them?
Wouldn't work - imagine Boris Johnson trying to mind all his babies! Too many!
I think there should be a tax on all men to compensate for escaping the torture of having babies.
In a country where abortion is not available, the tax should at least cover daycare and healthcare for babies and education for all minors.
I was wondering what happened to the 2 space exploration companies that launched around the same time. Looks like they didn't last long.
I have high hopes for the space sector once SpaceX Starship becomes operation. I really, really hope they don't go bankrupt first!
I'm not sure its worth hoping that Europe gets its act together! Arianne was the leader until SpaceX ate its lunch.
Time to get those StarCops episodes out again...
Its really all about computer vision, which has been a "difficult" problem since the beginning of computer technology. Intelligence is not required.
Lidar, radar, special road infrastructure, car-to-car communication, they are all dead ends. Imagine the maintenance burden keeping visible and non-visible signs coherent! What happens if a temporary speed limitation contradicts a radio broadcast global speed? So computer vision is required.
On the other hand, humans are terrible drivers and have awful eyesight. Ultimately full self driving is inevitable, and its a holy grail in the trucking industry. For trucks autoroute and main arteries would be enough.
I have no doubt its coming to personal vehicles, in the town centre. When and at what cost is the question - before I retire I hope...
My take at a solution is to choose members of parliament by lottery:
- anyone eligible must submit a form saying they agree to drop their current activities for 4 or 5 years
- no need for political parties, no funding for political parties.
- the group chosen decides on a leadership committee
- all members get an office and a budget, and can work on whatever preoccupies them
- including hiring auditors and running tribunals
- members can pool budgets on a year-by-year basis
- the role of government is like a board of directory, they're not there to take decisions
- the civil service takes decisions under guidance of the leadership committee.
The cost of making a truck autonomous is a much smaller investment than the cost of making a car autonomous.
Since the start of the rush to autonomous driving I've seen the car as a test platform and as a way to raise public awareness and acceptance for self-driving vehicles in general.
However the economic benefit of an autonomous car is low - robotaxis aren't going to change the world. On the other hand an autonomous truck can probably drive more than 20 hours a day, literally doubling the return on investment compared to a truck and driver.
Full Self Driving software will be expensive simply because there's so much money on the table in the trucking world....
I do most of my tools in Perl, I feel very productive, I can maintain my code easily.
However when I go it'll all go in the bin.
I tried doing a few projects in Bash to be more politically correct, but in truth none of my colleagues are able to write or understand a real program in Bash.
I feel that I should switch to Python, it has a lot of good features, but I never have a new project and the time to invest at the same time.
Back to my current question, how to parse a date in year + day of year format in perl. Surprisingly none of the standard modules want to touch it...
There are unfortunately some unwelcome truths about fusion that don't get enough airing.
We can probably get to a point where we can reliably produce a fusion reaction and indeed get surplus energy from it.
However there are some caveats. The energy output is probably in the form of gamma rays or high energy neutrons, not something you can boil a kettle with.
The neutrons produced will turn the reactor radioactive, and are also useable to convert uranium into plutonium.
Also the above fusion reaction is probably using trithium, which is not plentiful and abundant.
Please read this
https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/
Someone stole our future!
I remember seeing the video of the crash when it first happened.
Yes the driver didn't have her eyes on the road, but on the camera footage I couldn't see the pedestrian until the last second. Blink and you're too late.
My conclusion at the time was that the woman and bicycle were clearly in the wrong, and that that type of accident must happen all the time without anyone being sent to jail.
Uber or any other self-driving test organisation should be obliged to take out a special insurance to pay big money to anyone who manages to get hit by one of their cars. That would make them more risk aware..
"But VMs are already a well-understood, mature, technology for almost everything other than delivering easily iterated applications." Therefore containers aren't mature, QED.
Honestly I haven't studied containers at all, but I'd understood that the container interface isn't perfectly stable between versions and not identical across different implementations.
Isn't a container pretty much like a servlet? Why don't vendors just sell their products as a WAR file? Probably because there are always outside dependencies?
VM's are reliable, for me that's the winning feature.
Ciaran
This sounds like the eternal vi-emacs argument.
Personally I'm vi - simple, available everywhere. Like VMs.
One thing I particularly don't like about containers is the relative lack of storage or persistence.
However nothing I'm working on needs me to do the cost-benifit analysis. VMs let anyone administer the solution, its a known quantity, good enough for me.
So Ethanol or biodiesel? Zero carbon impact, ethanol burns very cleanly.
In France many supermarket petrol pumps offer E85, 80% ethanol, for about half the price of normal S95.
And yet I think there are currently no carmakers selling cars that can run on E85 without modifications.
Weird
5 minutes ago I got a request about an application not working. Admittedly its a first install for a new client, but all the same...
The error message says ...
No X11 DISPLAY variable was set, but this program performed an operation which requires it.
I do lots of crazy projects in perl that often involve parsing data coming from mainframes. I've taken to dumping everything into SQLite3 and then working it out from there.
Its incredibly fast, and SQLite is everywhere.
Frankly between Excel and SQLite, I know which binary format will be more future-proof.
Airbus planes except the A350 and A380 do have a wheel for manual pitch trim. Check out this article..
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/52362/why-dont-the-a380-and-a350-have-trim-wheels
The Airbus software will give up and hand control to the pilot when it can't figure out what's happening. I'm honestly not sure if that's reassuring or scary.
In the next big war, all the aircraft carriers, AWACS and aerial refuelling tankers will be out of action at the end of the first day. GPS will be inoperative, and battlefield wireless communications will be jammed.
Compare that to all the shiny stuff the militaries want...
Just this morming I uploaded a document to salesforce to attach it to a case, and I marveled at the % completion information Somethng like "69.123456789%", if not more digits.
A few years ago I took a photo of a price in the supermarket saying the price per kilo was 123.666666666667 euros.
Total bork!
I entirely agree with the proposition that the seniors in a company can find space in their homes to work from home comfortably.
When I was a junior I lived in a small apartment in Paris that was badly insulated, and I had a good lunch subsidised by the company.
So today if I was going to buy or rent I'd need an extra space for a real desk. 1 room appartments the world over will become unsellable.
There will be many unforseen impacts.
Personally I'm gaining weight, not loosing it. I used to cycle to work and eat tiny lunches...
Some years ago, an internal FBI memo was released saying that if evidence came from illegal telephone monitoring it would be a good idea to downplay that aspect of the investigation by documenting alternative sources for the information. Anonymous tip-offs increased mightily.
However I can't find an article about it. It was before Snowden.
Regularly there are articles, including on The Register, about miraculous new investigation tools that on the face of it couldn't possibly work, I always assume they're being pushed as an alternative source of information to hide the use of classified (and therefore illegal) information.
Airbus has a "Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility" in Mobile Alabama, where they produce A320 family planes since 2016.
I believe that Northrop Grumman has a big hand in the Boeing fighter programs, so they could probably take over Boeing Defense. But I agree, the US fighters are in a dire situation between obselescence and disfunction, both causeing increased costs and lower availability. They should probably look to replace their older F-16s with the Gripen.
Airlines pay a deposit when they order, but they have a loan arrangment to cover the total cost of the plane when they receive it. So taking possession of the airplane is cash-flow positive - they get their deposit back, basically. Which for certain airlines is a very important consideration...
Supprt means "we'll take the call".
Maintained means "we can provide a correction"
I support lots of products where the developpers no longer want to compile the source.
My clients understand what box they're in, but they're still paying the yearly tithe to be able to call me.
The US pours all its money into offensive weapons like aircraft and carriers, meanwhile Russia pours lots of money into missiles. Turkey bought the S-400 because its way more effective and way cheaper than anything the US has.
Missiles are defensive. Aircraft can be defensive or offensive. Therefore the US is scarier than Russia, amirite ?
Thanks for the upvote!
I am consistently amazed at what fighter aircraft manufacturers will say! I have never seen one admit to a restriction or a liability. Sometimes they do leave in a kicker to stay honest, like "... when we get the budget".
Anyway, the Typhoon engine air intakes look "difficult" to make stealthy. They're rectangular. And I don't remember anyone saying that they have an "S-bend" to hide the turbine blades from direct radar illumination. On the other hand, in the Rafale backstory there is a phase when Saudi Arabia asked for "low radar cross section". That happened just as they were going from prototype to final design. The story goes that the final aircraft looks just like the prototype, but that "nothing is the same". Dassault markets the Rafale as a "Discrete Omnirole supersonic fighter". Discrete as opposed to being "Oh my Holy God" obvious.
Typhoon gets the message out about using RAM (radar absorbing materials) but doesn't really directly say anything about their cross section. Rhere's no official published radar cross section info from any the respective manufacturers.
The F-35 says its "really good" form in front - not so much from the back and sides. The Rafale has a huge flat tail that's probably easy to pick up from the side. Your milage may vary...
Dassaut were producing "delta wing" fighter jets since a long time. The company building Typhoon was created from scratch. Typhoon and Rafale have a similar "delta canard" design. Which final design is probably the best?
Have you noticed any design faults on the Typhoon?
First the canards are so far forward that the pilot's view of the ground is blocked. OK for air-to-air, which was the Typhoon's original target.
Then the wheels fold up laterally into the wings, making it more difficult to put extra tanks and heavy weapons close to the centerline - on the Typhoon they're all mounted wayyy forward. The wheels on the Rafale fold up longitudinally.
The great one is how the Typhoon sales people have always criticized the Rafale for being designed to do everything from the beginning, whereas the Typhoon was specialized for air-to-air. But now they've stopped saying that because they're trying to compete as a multirole fighter
You're right, and there's even an abomination of a project called the "Sea Typhoon". They actually drew a diagram with an arrestor hook. And thrust vectoring engines, always good to add something they can drop later on... If anyone can bear it, I found it here..
https://www.eurofighter.com/multimedia/download/naval-typhoon-cutaway-1015
I seem to recall The Register doing an article on that. The UK govt was "just asking for a friend" if they could share desk space with other fighters, like F18 or Rafale... The question coincided with a love-in between the UK and French militaries. BAE panicked, thinking the F35 contract was at risk, and used the UDP party line - Ulster says "NO" !