Re: Fails to mention blistering fast install time of Linux Mint 17.3
@RIBrsiq That's a strange tic you've got there, adding "CE" to the end of years.
400 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jul 2015
Bezos's accomplishment was impressive, for sure, although it's important to remember that the man is a bona fide independent billionaire. It's reasonably easy to do things when you don't have commercial constraints.
Aside from the massive technical differences, which you alluded to, what strikes me is that Musk has achieved this on a commercial launch with a company that actually has customers and makes money.
I also happen to think that Bezos is a total dick, but that's just personal.
Amusingly, here's an earlier article talking about exactly that from the same author.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/20/us_air_force_x37b_space_plane_in_orbit/
There is good rigorous evidence that shared family mealtimes improve a number of childhood outcomes. If you don't have a shared mealtime, I would definitely recommend that you consider it.
See https://www.human.cornell.edu/pam/outreach/upload/Family-Mealtimes-2.pdf for example.
"Most of them, especially the children DIDN'T sign up....they were indoctrinated from birth"
While I agree with you, our society generally says adults are adults. Either we accept that they have the ability to consciously change their beliefs, or we drop the silly fiction that adults are responsible for all their own actions all the time. Can't have both.
"There is little difference between this and what goes on in Muslim Madrassas."
Don't see the Catholics instructing kids that Western education is evil, that the only thing worth doing is memorising a book, that women are property, or that waging neverending war against the infidel is the duty of everyone.
Aside from that, yeah, just like the madrassas.
What is a supercomputer anyway?
I'd bet that Google's compute power makes Tianhe-2 look like a pocket calculator, but they're not saying and - for reasons that escape me - large cloud facilities don't appear to count as supercomputers.
Which is odd because Google is demonstrably capable of running arbitrarily complex compute loads at enormous scale on their infrastructure.
All this is by way of saying that an increasingly large proportion of the innovation in high performance computing is happening in areas that aren't even recognised as such.
The devil will be in the detail, but if the setup is done in such a way that T-Systems's permission is required under German law, then it should be safe as Microsoft Germany will not be able to break German law to satisfy Microsoft US's requests.
The devil is in the detail though. I'd be interested to know how they intend to prove compliance.
I understand the SD card point, but replacement batteries?
Really?
External USB batteries are so much more convenient - they are potentially much larger, they can be charged directly, and you don't have to power down the phone or fiddle with the case to use them.
"It is up to customers to vote with their feet and just walk away if they don't like an OEM's patching policy"
Really? What percentage of Android consumers do you think are honestly tech-savvy enough to even know what a patching policy is, let alone have any idea before purchase about their vendor's policy?
None. Or as close to none as makes a rounding error.
Google should be ensuring compliance from end to end as part of their CTS and play store policy.
C and C++ are not *very* different. What an asinine thing to say. First, C++ is a superset of C. Second, the reason that C++ is dangerous come down to point 1.
Inferring that I know nothing about them from what I said is ludicrous. I have twenty years of professional development experience under my belt, a number of them in C++. I know what I'm talking about. Also, you might want to look up the phrase "Ad hominem attack" on Google.
If you want two very different languages, how about C and Haskell?
I'm not exactly saying the language is "at fault". I'm not even sure that "at fault" is a meaningful concept.
I'm just saying that most of the major security flaws uncovered in code are down to two specific things: buffer overruns and pointer mismanagement. No matter how bad a developer is, most languages don't allow the first and make the second much less likely.
It's not like I hate C. I don't. I enjoy writing in it - it's powerful, expressive and fun. I just don't think the risks of using it in production environments are worth it.
My concern there is that any solution which requires that people change their behaviour en masse is doomed to failure. So "having people create *easily* repeatable tests" is doomed.
If people were going to do that, they already would. Some do, lots don't and probably never will.
As for the idea of D being not suitable for use after 1999, well that's just silly. D is in strong, active development.
"But the primary purpose of a handgun is to kill people."
Well, as we all know, C is short for "Confuse". The primary purpose of C is to confuse developers and produce security holes. Software is a side effect of code written in C.
Also, I wasn't comparing guns and C. I was comparing argument styles. You might want to brush up on your language comprehension skills.
If something as difficult and rocket-sciency as a hypervisor, presumably written by the best of the best of the best, can still contain these sorts of problems, what hope for the vast bulk of C software?
Most of which - unlike, perhaps, a hypervisor - could happily be written in any number of safe languages.
As for the hypervisor, well what about D? It's a mature, robust language. Or if you insist on going all dawn-of-computing, how about Ada?
"But it's not the language, it's the bad developers!" they cry.
Fine, whatever, but does it matter what the cause is? Safe libraries for C have been around for a very long time. Why hasn't the situation improved yet? If we could fix the bad developers, we would have already done so. We can't. So let's engineer it so they can't do so much harm.
That's not political correctness. It's just not. You have a misogyny problem.
99.9% of hackers are not men. Most surveys put it at 85% at most.
So you'd expect to see at least 1/8 articles referring to "she". But then given that the human population is 50% women, why should the default be "he"?
And it's not going to get any better all the time there are grumpy, sexist trolls like you in the industry.
"in the hands of competent programmers".. There, that's the bad assumption right there.
Firstly, it's not just incompetent programmers that are prone to fits of forgetfulness and/or stupidity.
Secondly, many - perhaps even most - organisations do not exclusively employ only competent programmers. Clearly.
If they did, we'd never hear about buffer overrun exploits, would we? But we do hear about them. So something needs to change. If we can't change the people - and it appears that we can't seem to manage that - then maybe we need to get defensive with the technology instead?
Never understood analysts who talk of markets, segments, partners and the like. You're over complicating it.
It's all about product. Either you sell stuff, people buy it and you make money, or you don't. Microsoft clearly believe they can have a good chance of selling stuff. Hence, they're making stuff.
Let's see if they're right.