Posts by Hawkeye Pierce

Linus Torvalds tries vibe coding, world still intact somehow

Re: "as long as it isn't for something important"

Absolute rubbish.

With 40+ years of development across a number of technologies and having worked on, designed and built many business systems, AI can absolutely generate 100% functional code corresponding to my needs. I've been there, done that and used it. No I'm not going to use it to write an entire system but I've used it multiple times to deliver completely working functional libraries/services/factories (amend according to your language of choice) many of which consist of several hundred lines of code, saved me days worth of work, passed unit tests and now live in production systems.

I find people who rubbish AI tend to either have not used it, or not learnt how to use it well, or came to it with unreasonable expectations.

Having lived through a number of technology changes over my years on this earth, I find great similarity with both the advent of the PC and later with the advent of the internet and particularly the dot-com boom. Both of those had many people claiming it was a fad and would implode, others claiming that the world would drastically change (usually with claims that no one would have jobs)... And the truth, as always then and now with AI is somewhere in between.

Tired of sky-high memory prices? Buckle up, we're in this for the long haul

Re: Confused.com

My understanding is that the markets may be separate but the factories are not. Put simply, those manufacturers who make memory are switching production to where the majority demand is - thus causing a lack of supply for the consumer market - and hence prices going up for that market. As the article notes, bringing additional capacity online takes years and the historical fluctuation in prices has meant no-one has committed to building excess capacity to take advantage of times such as now.

Praise Amazon for raising this service from the dead

Re: "Praise Amazon for raising this service from the dead"

To be fair "CodeCommit" is close to being about the only AWS service whose name gives a broad enough indication of what it does!

Ransomed CTO falls on sword, refuses to pay extortion demand

Good response... and that's a rare thing

Bad things happen. And once they've happened, how you respond is important.

I've read many a response by companies such as this to incidents such as this and, more often than not, I'm left with the feeling that I would never choose to use them in the future. The misdirection of "sophisticated attackers".. the "sorry for any inconvenience to our customers", the whole "security is our number one focus" or "our customers are important to us".

But a response such as this? OK, would prefer not to be reading it, but if it had involved me, I'd think I'd feel a little more reassured rather than less.

You'll never guess what the most common passwords are. Oh, wait, yes you will

Re: Where are they getting the passwords from?

Stealer logs.... malware running on computers capturing the passwords as they were typed.

See https://www.troyhunt.com/2-billion-email-addresses-were-exposed-and-we-indexed-them-all-in-have-i-been-pwned/ for some details.

Space Shuttle war of words takes off as senator blasts 'woke Smithsonian'

Opposite of "woke"?

I'm sure it was elsewhere on the Register's forums. that I read someone who suggested that the opposite of "being woke" was "being an arsehole" and that of the two extremes, he knew which end he'd prefer to be considered as closest to.

Virtual beer (see right) for whoever posted that, as I've stolen it ever since.

Two scrubs, one Starship: Third time lucky for SpaceX?

Re: Any plumbers reading this?

Yes but have you seen what the call-out charge is for a plumber?

BOFH: Peeling back the layers of the magic banana industrial complex

Re: And then...

Obligatory post:

https://xkcd.com/927

Frozen foods supermarket chain deploys facial recognition tech

Re: Hmm

Moreover, as the article itself states, earlier this month a completely innocent shopper was blacklisted due to having been incorrectly uploaded to the Facewatch database by a store who claimed she hadn't paid for something when she had - and had the receipt to prove it. So the statement that the technology "does not monitor innocent shoppers" is demonstrably false.

And then given that the completely innocent shopper was not alleged to have been violent in any way, in no way would her presence on the database protect any Iceland member of staff and clearly does not square with the statement that "It helps trained store teams calmly identify repeat offenders who are known to use violence or intimidation. That's it."

Let's be clear, this is primarily about anti-shoplifting. Not about anti-violence. It can't possibly stop someone hitting a shopworker although it might help catch and prosecute such a person after the event.

Personally I'm not 100% against use of this technology. But I am 100% against the inaccurate, false and deceptive quotes around what it does and what it is for.

Judge halts DOGE's union personal data grab at OPM, Treasury, Education

Re: ... the data has long flown the coup.

Coup or coop? Wondering if using the homophone was deliberate, but very apt if so! Have a beer ->

Scotland now home to Europe's biggest battery as windy storage site fires up

@Iglethal - Re: This is great news but...

I disagree. I can assimilate what 3.1m houses means - I can derive a rough figure for how many people that covers, roughly what percentage of the UK populate that represents and so forth.

But "every house in Scotland" means very little to me. I don't know how many houses there are. Being pedantic, are we talking houses or households? Are we talking about populated house(holds) or including every holiday-let, second-home and other unoccupied premises?

I'm really puzzled as to what you mean by saying "3.1m houses doesn't have any real world parallel"!! I'd have said the real world parallel was... 3.1m houses!! Can't get much more real than that, and certainly more real than a nebulous "every house in Scotland".

Abandoned AWS S3 buckets can be reused in supply-chain attacks that would make SolarWinds look 'insignificant'

Re: What!

Indeed - I've always thought that the fact that AWS bucket names are globally unique is crazy.

There was (and is) another vulnerability reported a short while back whereby anyone finding an enumerable list of buckets such as "ABC-Client-1", "ABC-Client-2" etc, can simply go and create a bucket called "ABC-Client-99" in their own AWS account and wait to see what happens.

If AWS stuck the account number in front of the bucket name then sure you could create "ABC-Client-99" but it would be unique under your account not globally. And if you wanted anyone else to access it, you still can by just issuing the account number + bucket name and setting the appropriate permissions.

We told Post Office about system problems at the highest level, Fujitsu tells Horizon Inquiry

Re: Dog Fight

This would be the same Fujitsu employees who the Judge in the Horizon trial on 16th December 2019 stated:

I have very grave concerns regarding the voracity of evidence given by Fujitsu employees to other courts in previous proceedings about the known existence of bugs, errors and defects in the Horizon system

Hope that answers your (rhetorical) question.

When your technological ghosts come back to haunt you, expect humbug

+1

Title says it all.

Thank you.

Google expands visual, audio search, lets AI handle layout

A good thing...

> Also, Lens does not use facial recognition, making it not very useful for identifying people.

You make it sound like that's a bad thing!

Tesla that killed motorcyclist was in Full Self-Driving mode

Re: Heck; I can't even trust my Volvo

But saying that you "maintain sufficient situational awareness to know if I must indicate" means that you consider yourself to be absolutely infallible, never going to make a mistake, never going to have missed something, never going to have an absolute idiot elsewhere do something silly, etc.

... which is an incredibly dangerous assumption to make.

I do remember my driving instructor many many years ago saying the same thing - "why are you indicating? Who are you indicating to?". But let me put it another way... What is the HARM in indicating? If there is a 0.000001% chance that doing so avoids an accident then surely it's worth doing unless you can demonstrate a greater chance that it causes harm?

Sure, there's a possibility that you forget to cancel the indicator (on that rare time when you indicated but didn't need to). Sure that's, annoying to other users, but it's not really causing harm. So what other harm can be caused, if you would otherwise have indicated if there was definitely a reason to?

Agile Manifesto co-author blasts failure rates report, talks up 'reimagining' project

Re: The more process you have the less agile you are.

@Missing Semicolon, have an upvote. You'd have more if I could give more.

I'm gobsmacked that anyone can genuinely say "And that's all you need". Too many developers think that it's all about them, all about the software. They have no regard for the other aspects that any sensible business needs to plan for. Like when does the training material need to get worked on? When can the sales people start selling it? When can the detailed planning start for the next project? What is the roadmap for the next 12 months? Do we need to employ more, or less, developers to handle the workload?

Any software development team or project manager who is unable to give estimates of how long it will take is quite simply failing.

Re: Managers Sometimes DEMAND a Load of Whalesong

@An_Old_Dog

What a complete load of rubbish. If someone asked you how long it takes to drive from Manchester to London, you'd say something like 4.5 hours. You wouldn't say, well it depends if you go via Land's End, or it depends if you have a medical emergency on the way and end up in hospital for a month before completing the journey, or that you can't say because they've not said whether they plan on driving at 1mph or 70mph.

Sure you might then go an caveat your estimate by saying there are some plausible variables which may affect things, and - if you were being helpful - you'd say that they might want to factor in perhaps an additional hour or so for some margin.

Your comment sums up everything that is wrong about the software development industry, and some of what is wrong about agile, Nobody likes the hard, detailed planning which is needed to come up with decent estimates, or the measurement needed to record how previous developments went according to their plan. Developers certainly don't want to do that (I'm generalising here), they want to start writing code at the very earliest opportunity, which is partly why agile is so popular. Of course there are unknowns, and variables which will affect things. And there are processes to accommodate and manage those. But jumping on the very first excuse and using that as to why it's impossible to come up with any estimate is ridiculous. So you've not been given all the requirements? Then estimate the ones you have. Estimate what your best guess is for the ones you don't know and explain what your margin of error is.

Can you name any other industry where your response would be considered acceptable? If you ask a builder how long it will take to add an extension to your house, you wouldn't expect him to say something along the lines of what you've put. And while I accept that many (far too many) software projects or indeed any form of engineering projects overrun, even that is no excuse for not having the plan. After all, if there is no plan, you can't say that you've overrun (hmm, and again that's another reason agile is popular), and if there is no plan, you can't improve on your estimation techniques for the next project.

But because it's hard, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be done and because it's hard, that doesn't mean that management shouldn't get told estimates.

Fragile Agile development model is a symptom, not a source, of project failure

Re: A view from an

I fail to understand your points above.

"Software is elastic"? So what? If you copy a poorly designed, bug-ridden piece of software a billion times, you now have a billion copies of a poorly designed, bug-ridden piece of software.

"Software can be delivered immediately"? If you're trying to use that as an excuse for shipping bug-ridden software ("hey, we can immediate deliver a fix") then it's a poor reason.

"Software is easy(ish) to revise (even completely)"? I disagree. I've seen many fundamental flaws in software that go right back to original design decisions and which to "fix" would basically mean starting again. I've seen small pieces of software developed in a few weeks require what would appear to be a minor bug fix which takes a significant percentage of the original development time to retrofit.

The costs of mistakes in software can be enormous. If you've got a large development team and pick up a fundamental flaw in the latter stages of development, the cost can be huge to fix. If it's discovered post-deployment then even more so (see Horizon). Ditto for "In software you can experiment for little cost".

Software Engineering is still engineering. May not be the same as other forms of engineering but then mechanical engineering isn't the same as electrical engineering. In general terms, if you're building a large, time-consuming, complex "thing" then the fundamentals of engineering apply.

Study finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projects

Re: Next Week

Agree with the above. Moreover, if you took an average bunch of developers and ask them what they disliked about software development and then wrote up a methodology that didn't do any of those things, you'd pretty much have the Agile methodology. Developers don't like documenting things - so that's out. Working to specs - nope. Detailed estimation for the development? No, let's just focus on the next two weeks.

Agile is a methodology written by developers for developers. And unfortunately developers very often lose sight of the fact that the software is not the be-all-and-end-all, it's the use of the software, the purpose of the software, the benefit of the software that should be the focus - i.e. what the software does not how it was built that matters.

It's fine for certain types of projects. And absolutely wrong for others including, as a general broad-brush categorisation, most large business or Government type of applications. If you're a startup trying to launch your minimum viable product and then rapidly iterate, then fine, use Agile. If you're developing an ERP system or a finance/accounting/banking system, you'd better have a detailed spec, timescales, cost estimates, budgets and a clear idea of how to go about all of it.

The people who shout "Agile" from the rooftops have typically only experienced those projects that it (might be) good for and yet think that their experience encompasses all. Software development covers a huge spectrum amd in the same way that you wouldn't necessarily trust someone who can build a wall to build you a house, or trust someone who can build a house to build a skyscraper, what works or is appropriate in one place is not necessarily appropriate for another.

... coming from a software developer with 40+ years plus of bespoke development experience with a Computer Science degree before that. I've read, been taught, learned and used many different methodologies over those years, most of which promise to fix the failings of the previous one. Agile may have lasted more than some of the others, but I have no doubt that there will be another one along soon...

Microsoft, Google do a victory lap around passkeys

>> What you send is some kind of encrypted version of your password

That's not really true for 99% of all websites, at least in the way that I think you mean. Those 99% are sending your password as you typed it to the remote server although hopefully over an (encrypted) HTTPS connection. Yes, the server should then hash (not encrypt) the received password and compare against the hashed version stored in its database, but the server most certainly receives your password in the vast majority of any website (Google being an exception).

If it was as you said, then the hashing mechanism along with the salt would be visible for all to see in the client's browser making a rather large security issue. HTTPS provides sufficient encryption of your password to make it fine to send as you typed. After all, if someone was able to intercept and somehow decode your HTTPS traffic, your "encrypted version" of your password could be easily enough reverse engineered given that the encyption mechanism would be known from the front-end and thus you've not really added any additional security over the fact that your sending it over an encrypted connection.

(The above is somewhat simplistic, there are mechanisms whereby the server could pass randomly generated and time limited salt to the browser to use but that greatly complicates matters with no appreciable change to the security level.)

'Scandal-plagued' data broker tracked visits to '600 Planned Parenthood locations'

Somwhat missing the point?

Methinks you're somewhat missing the point if your takeway from the article is to do with advertisements rather than the collection and then selling of location data...

Everyone's suing AI over text and pics. But music? You ain't seen nothing yet

I believe Fogerty won ths court case didn't he? And that he then succesffuly countersued?

Furthermore the two cases against him followed the release of Centerfield were on more specific terms that just "sounds too much like CCR" - one was because one of the tracks was considered to be a personal slanderous attack on the then-owner of the rights to his previous songs and the second was on the basis that a chorus was the same (not just "sounds like") that from a previous CCR song.

Windows boss takes on taskbar turmoil, pledges to 'make Start menu great again'

Re: Typing in the start menu

For those who are using the Start Menu and typing a few characters in, can I recommend the "PowerToys Run" module from the Microsoft PowerToys.

See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/powertoys/run

(If anyone used to use Launchy then this is a more-or-less direct replacement/upgrade).

Elon is the bakery owner swearing in the street about Yelp critics canceling him

I have to disagree with most of what you've said.

Almost all discussion about "freedom of speech" ends up back with the American Constitution - or else you're talking purely philosophically with no definitive written word to make it anything other than a philosphical or moral debate.

As such it most certainly does relate to the government - then as to now - as it's the government that has the ability to severly restrict your personal freedoms. So no, an advertiser can not dictate what I can say in public and a government mustn't be allowed to - there is a significant different there.

You seem to conflating that difference with the ability of an advertiser to put financial pressure on a business - which is a completely different issue. An advertiser is not stating what is or isn't OK. They're saying that their money may get withdrawn and that the business may suffer, but that business is still free to do what they want. And your comment about businesses "funded by member subscription" is also far off the mark. Unless said business has a consitution requiring votes from the membership, said business is perfectly entitled to do what they want and as to whether "the majority" then walk away, that doesn't prevent that business from continuing as they please and who knows, maybe the minority is still sufficient to remain in business.

Re: Feedly

Came here to say the same thing - in response to the brief discussion about direct traffic. RSS for the win! But sadly it appears to be less and less visible (or indeed being remove) on more and more sites.

But if you have a site which publishes articles (whether a news site, or a blog,or a newsletter) and it doesn't offer an RSS feed, I'm unlikely to revisit.

Rackspace runs short of Cloud Files storage in LON region

What about...

Have they tried clearing the contents of the TEMP folder? Or emptying the Recycle Bin?

Trio of major holes in ownCloud expose admin passwords, allow unauthenticated file mods

Good name for the product

The "own" in ownCloud presumably means your cloud gets owned not that YOU own it?

Lawyers who cited fake legal cases generated by ChatGPT blame the software

The "AI" is a red herring here...

In summary:

1. Lawyers typed some search request into a website

2. Website came back with some "results"

3. Lawyers took said results verbatim without checking anything

Their major failing was at step 3 and how that step was arrived at (whether AI or a *cough* reputable search engine) is pretty much irrelevant to their failing.

Europe’s biggest city council faces £100M bill in Oracle ERP project disaster

Re: They're not special. They're just big.

I agree with the above comments. Having been involved in some quite big corporate system developments, all too often companies state their requirements based on what they do. Which leads to the inability to use any off-the-shelf software as-is because it doesn't do things exactly how the company has always done things.

The answer should be to challenge how things have been done and consider whether it would be prudent to change how things are done to how the software wants things to be done. Some people will claim heresy at this point but the reality is that the bespoke development (including customisation/ehnahcement of off the shelf packages) is typically many times more complex than initially thought (often because the people who are in charge of using the system are not skilled/experienced in explaining and detailing the requirements and further more, you're left with a highly customised package, more or less beholden to continuing to use whoever the developers were who did the modifications because only they understand it, and all leading to a cost hugely more over the lifetime of the software than simply using the software off the shelf and changing one's practices accordingly.

Bespoke software is costly - from requirements capture to ongoing support. Off-the-shelf software is cheaper in the short-term and the long-term with lower maintenance & support costs and the possibility of upgrades over time.

For what should be relatively standard processes such as HR & Finance, organisations should really consider whether they have to have custom software or whether they should change their practices to conform to the software.

3CX thought supply chain attack was a false positive

Fail

Of course the real failure here was on the part of the writers of the malware who, having infected 3CX software, failed to register their malware with Virus Total. If they had followed that procedure then 3CX could have easily confirmed that their software was indeed malware-infested and...

... oh wait, hang on....

UK Online Safety law threatens Big Tech bosses with jail

@jollyborspecial

>>Read the detail of the proposal again. We're talking here about a pretty narrow set of circumstances that no court of law would ever consider to cover what you're talking about.

I'm unclear from what you say as to why you seem to imply that Steve down the road has nothing to worry about. If Steve has opened an online forum then he is absolutely 100% within the scope of the legislation. And to parrot your statement, go read the legislation and it's very clear in taht regard.

Whether he may find himself in court will then be wholly dependent on what takes place in that forum. Yes, if it's all about wrongdoings of government then he's probably going to be OK. But if other matters start to be discussed, he might not sleep so well at night.

Musk roundly booed on-stage at Dave Chappelle gig

Re: One of the rare times he escaped his own reality bubble recently

Re the supposed Fauci "lie".

I will bet my house that most people who claim he "lied" are basing this on a few-second video clip that is prevalent on... oh yes, Twitter.

I saw that clip. And I thought to myself,"that's a bit odd". And I questioned whether it might have been taken out-ot-context. I questioned whether it might have in fact been doctored (because... you know... that can happen).

So I did what any sensible, logical person would do who wants to ascertain facts.I found the transcript of the interview. Took me all of perhaps two seconds, but to save people time: https://www.msnbc.com/transcripts/transcript-all-chris-hayes-5-17-21-n1267740

And you know what? OMG he did say that!!!!

But you know what he also said in that interview? Try these quotes:

- "Breakthrough infections mean, you have been vaccinated, but you still get infected."

- "...even if you do get a breakthrough infection, when you`re vaccinated, the chances of you are transmitting it to someone else is exceedingly low."

So you know what? If he is "a liar" he's a shockingly bad one as he admitted a few seconds earlier in that same interview that, *shock horror*, you can still get infected after being vaccinated.

Was it a poor choice of words he used? Possibly. Is that quote out of context? Somewhat. Could he have been clearer? Yes.

But to call him a liar is simply ludicrous.

Twitter dismantles its Trust and Safety Council moments before meeting

Re: Snowflake journalism

You use the word "haters" but I don't see any justification for the use of that word. Lots of people here are "critics" of Musk and in my opinion that's a fair stance to take.

Those that are critical of him are typically basing their opinions not on the last 2 seconds or even on just his post-buyout actions but on many years of his behaviour, comments and conduct.

In my opinion, he's a very unpleasant person. I certainly don't hate him but I will certainly criticise numerous of his activities with - again, in my opinion, but it would seem with agreement of many others - very good evidence to support me.

Guess the most common password. Hint: We just told you

@Iglethal

Brute forcing is most certainly an issue in either of your two solutions. As others have said, if you're locking the account, you've introduced an avenue for a denial of service attack and run the risk of losing all your users because they can't log in. If you do it on a backing-off approach (your second solution) then all I need to do is to cycle through my 000's of potential usernames and by the time I get back to the first, I've spent 5 seconds.

If you take into account the IP address before blocking/locking, you're not defending against botnets.

If you don't use (or enforce) long complex passwords, you're open to cracking. Salting passwords is no great defence if you suffer a breach and enough people have short passwords.

So yes, use of extra long complex passwords does indeed massively improve security. I can pretty much guarantee that my 30-char password is safe providing that the site implements what should be consider basic security even in the event of their database getting breached. I could not say the same to any degree of certainty if my password was say 8 characters no matter how complex it was.

Too bad, contractors: UK government reverses decision to axe IR35 tax reform

Re: This should make people happy

>> "The coalition... an increase in spending"

Factually incorrect. Spending by the UK Government fell every year from 2010/11 until 2013/14 even before adjusting for inflation.

Florida asks Supreme Court if it's OK to ban content moderation it doesn't like

Re: You can either have Free Speech

>> "... conflating natural human beings... with business... corporations are... not natural persons"

In law - on both sides of the pond - a corporation/company is indeed a legal person and as such is far from "a legal fiction". Which makes perfect sense given that people and companies can both be libelled/defamed, sued, sign contracts, etc.

Appeals court already under fire for upholding Texas no-content-moderation law

Re: Here we go...

Completely agree with the above. Furthermore, I'd point out the ludicrous statement from the ruling that "... the platforms argue... a corporation's unenumerated right to muzzle speech."

As you point out the First Amendment does indeed prevent a Government from muzzling an individual. But a corporation (platform) removing comment from an individual in no way "muzles" speech - said individual is perfectly entitled to take their comment and post, or speak, or otherwise publish that anywhere else they want (that will allow them).

While I accept that a major platform banning comment does remove a large proportion of the potential audience, it is ridiculous to equate that to being muzzled.

Microsoft: The deadline to get off Basic Auth is approaching

Re: So does this mean Everyone now has to use 2FA?

No it doesn't mean you have to use 2FA.

Basic Auth is basically (pun intended) sending the username & password with every request.

Alternatives to Basic Auth would include schemes such as OAuth whereby a tme-limited token is used once the username & password have been authenticated.

Nuclear power is the climate superhero too nervous to wear its cape

Re: Deaths are not the only metric

Rubbish that we don't import Russian gas.

In 2021, 4% of the gas used in the UK was from Russia. And for the record, around 10% of the oil used was from Russia along with over 25% of the coal used.

Elon Musk sells Tesla shares worth $6.9b as Twitter lawsuit looms

Re: Musk's sofa

I disagree about the possible cost of an agreed settlement.

As of today, Twitter has a capitalisation of circa $33B. Musk offered $44B.

Simplistically (very simplistically), if Musk handed over $11B to Twitter, the share price would rise to the level giving a capitalisation of what he valued the company at. Any investors then have the opportunity to sell at the price he offered and consequently there would be no case for a shareholder lawsuit.

Of course, markets don't work in such precise definable ways, so it may well take more than $11B. But I'd expect something between $11B-$20B to suffice.

Not exactly small change even for Musk (although I image the cost to his ego in settling would hurt him more), but significantly cheaper than $44B.

Twilio customer data exposed after its staffers got phished

Re: Sure

Except as has been proven many times over, humans are **REALLY** bad at a) looking at the URL and b) determining whether it is valid.

From mobile browsers hiding the URL, to non-Western characters in the domain to make it look right, to variations on the domain name (twilio-support.com, login-twilio.com, etc.), anyone, whether company or user, relying on reading the URL for their security is going to hit trouble.

See https://www.troyhunt.com/humans-are-bad-at-urls-and-fonts-dont-matter/ for a good write-up with examples.

Google's ChromeOS Flex turned my old MacBook into new frustrations

Err no they are not. PWAs are not SSBs and vice versa.

GitLab versus The Zombie Repos: An old plot needs a new twist

Define "disastrous".

If "large numbers of other code" was making regular use, one would certainly hope that those responsible for that other code had measures in place to guard against exactly this potential scenario. Or the scenario that the original author takes down their own repository. Or various other scenarios.

Because if they don't take those measures then all bets are off and frankly GitLab is only one of a number of problems you now have,

After config error takes down Rogers, it promises to spend billions on reliability

Now going to do what they should have done all along?

Is it just me or are they basically saying they are going to spend C$10B on what one might reasonably have expected them to have in place all along?

Russian ChessBot breaks child opponent's finger

Questionable Explanation

I find it hard to believe - or understand - the official explanation. The robot had just made its move and the human (child) supposedly played too quickly? What possible reason is there for the robot to grab the human's finger? Having made its move, it simply needed to retract its arm and wait to recognise the human having made their move. If anything, the human playing too quickly might conceivably make the robot not realise the human's move had been made, but certainly not to go all out into vindictive mode.

Be worried.... very worried...

Sage accused of strong-arming customers into subscriptions

Re: I don't get it

These versions of Sage perform an online licence check every few days. That code doesn't (currently) support TLS 1.2 and Sage are shutting down their licence check server which supports TLS 1.0/1.1. Hence Sage won't keep running because it's got nothing to talk to to confirm the licence validity.

Whilst no-one should expect support indefinitely for a "perpetual" licence, equally no-one should expect a vendor to be able to "remotely" kill-off such a perpetual licence. It's one thing for software to not work on a new O/S, but all other things being equal, you'd expect that software to keep working on the same environment.

I can appreciate that Sage might not want to patch the software to support TLS 1.2 - that can be tricky. But patching the code to disable the licence check completely (or to ignore any failed attempt to validate the licence) should be pretty trivial to do. Sure you run the risk of the software now being pirated, but we're talking about accounting software here...

Airbus flies new passenger airplane aimed at 'long, thin' routes

Low bar?

From the article:

>> That the plane returned safely suggests those tests went tolerably well,

That's a pretty low bar if your assessment of a plane returning safely is that it went "tolerably well" !!

Securing open-source code isn't going to be cheap

Re: It's not an open source problem - you forgot only

I have to strongly disagree with your opening statement.

Just about any form of security hampers usability almost by definition. Security is something that gets in your way of doing something by making you prove who you are before letting you do that thing.

As such every there is ALWAYS a trade-off between security and usability and as such there is no one level of security that is appropriate for everything. It depends on your analysis of the risks and the level of inconvenience/security you deem appropriate.

Logging in to The Register to post a message could be made more secure by implementing 2FA for example. But there's a usability trade-off there is to whether that is appropriate.

UK pins hopes on 'latest technology' to whittle down massive National Health Service waiting lists

Re: What could possibly go wrong?

I think I know where you got those numbers from, but if I'm correct, then you seriously need to review the countries you believe are in the EU! There's a lot more than "5k or fewer for other EU nationals" including 5K Spanish, 5K Romanian, 3K Greek for starters.

Amounts to around 5.4% of the total NHS staff but a greater proportion of medical staff - 8.7% of doctors.

And that's as of March 2021 by when many EU NHS workers had left. Wouldn't have said that was insignificant.

See https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7783/