Posts by Geoff (inMelbourne) 28 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jun 2015
Because that's easier to do. No hardware or software to acquire or maintain. Less faffing about.
And it works when you're away from your home network, which is 'often' for mobile phone users, and laptop users.
Something like NextDNS, or similar?
I'm open to alternatives, but the general idea seems sound to me.
It would be a simple matter, the administration reasoned, for a foreign company in a nation like China or Russia, where governments "compel companies subject to their jurisdiction … to cooperate with security and intelligence services," according to the proposed rule.
So that would be EXACTLY what the US government is doing right here.
Compelling all car companies 'subject to their jurisdiction ' to cooperate and choose only software that the US government likes.
Just like they compel telcos to not use Chinese network kit, or even sell Huawei handsets.
Pot, meet Kettle.
"Now can we extend this to ANY connected car tech, not just Chinese or Russian? I don't need or want a car with the capability of reporting my location, music preferences, list of contacts from phone, etc., but seems like most of them do these days"
And, of course, any Russian, or Chinese, or <insert bogeyman of the day here> HACKERS won't care at all what the country of origin of the car software is. They'll happily hack into a Ford or Toyota or BMW or anything else. Banning just the *foreign* car makers who have a better-cheaper product isn't going to solve that problem.
- It will use "agile" methodologies
- Budget is pre-defined
- Scope is pre-defined
- Deadlines are pre-defined
-----------------------------------------------
That, right there, is EVERY formal RFT process that has ever existed.
The customer has a specific job to do, gets a (fixed) budget allocation from 'higher up' to do it, and has several absolute requirements that define what 'done' looks like.
The customer gets some external companies in to quote, in the hope of choosing one that will actually result in a successful project.
The developers arrive, and waffle on about Agile, and Frameworks, and Methodologies.
The *clever* developers give a knowing wink to the actual techies in the room. They know it's all rubbish. They know that YOU know it's all nonsense. But right now there's a contract to be won, so they're playing the game.
Agile? It's a meaningless buzzword. Nothing more.
The real world has fixed budgets, solid due-dates, and very specific requirements.
If you're lucky, very very lucky, the 'internal resources' (ie: staff) will actually get enough 'spare time' from the daily grind to be of assistance.
...Anyone remember 3D TVs? Segways,?....
Oh do try and keep up!
I used a virtual AppStore in the Metaverse to download an open source AI program over-the-air to my EV that allows me to 3D print my own autonomous 5G Blockchain.
For what purpose, you ask?
To do anything *I* want.
And if you can't see the possibilities in that, then get out of the way. The future is now, old man. The future is now.
The Murdoch media should not be used to train AI, or even used as a source of facts.
The Murdoch media is a source of right-wing 'opinion pieces' for gullible looneys. Totally devoid of facts or balance.
Murdoch owns FOX News and Sky After Dark, for crying out loud!
The really disturbing question is: What is Sam Altman up to here? Why does he want to harness the angry-stupid masses of right-wing morons who believe what they read in The Australian, or the (Melbourne) Herald-SUN. What is he *really* up to? What's he going to do with that army?
What the F*&^ is he up to?
Perhaps it isn't necessary for EVs to make annoying noise pollution *all* of the time.
Perhaps someone could invent some kind of 'loud warning noise-maker device', operated by the driver of the EV when required. and fit those devices to EVs.
They could be called, oh, I duuno, a 'car horn'.
Together with autonomous braking, that should save the lives of the headphones-in pedestrians. And the damage to the cars.
Hmm. As a person who fondly remembers my Windows Phones (that UI!), this does get me thinking.
Every phone handset - iOS and Android - uses ARM processors.
Microsoft has a version of Windows 11 for ARM processors. It's good, it works, and it's been around for years with no significant issues (mostly on the Surface Pro X).
The actual phone functionality is simply an App - and Microsoft already has it from the Windows Phone days anyway.
The UI they had was the best available at the time, and frankly would still be that today. (Resizable tiles! Live tiles! Every App in a simple, scrollable alphabetical list on the second screen!)
Microsoft has an Android subsystem for Windows, so running Android Apps on a Windows Phone could be done for that one 'must have' App (a significant factor for Windows Phone back in the day). The emulation layer for ARM processors on x86 hardware would not be needed as much (or perhaps not at all), so it would be cleaner and lighter. Running Android Apps on a PC isn't very useful, but running Android Apps on a phone certainly is.
So, Microsoft: Why not make a Windows Phone now?
Still hanging on to my excellent Mate 20 Pro.
I'll replace it when it so much as skips a beat, or when a better shinier thing grabs my attention, but that day doesn't seem to be approaching (not yet, anyway).
Sure there's the risk of (Google) stealing my data. But that same risk will be there on whatever I get next.
"I'm guessing the US is really trying to stimulate the Chinese chipset expertise here, because there's no other explanation for the blatantly obvious ban of Huwei because they were simply a lot better at 5G than anyone else, and the anti-Chinese efforts in general."
It's true that the US panicked when China demonstrated a significant lead in 5G, and decided to impose sanctions in an attempt to slow China down and give themselves a chance to catch up.
It's backfired for the US, as we're now seeing. The Chinese have developed a domestic chip industry, and it appears that they've done so faster than anyone anticipated.
But the real looser here, sadly, is Tiawan.
China was TSMC's largest customer. There was an uneasy truce between Tiawan and mainland China, and TSMC was the reason. China could never invade Tiawan because that would hurt the Chinese economy. As stated regularly in The Register, Tiawan didn't need a military defense. Just throw some dirt into the TSMC factories (which would destroy them) and China would suffer.
The Chinese can now make 'good enough' chips themselves, and presumably they'll continue improving. They don't rely on Tiawan for that anymore.
Tiawan: You're screwed.
That's not the outcome for Tiawan I wanted, but it was inevitable once the US forced China to develop it's own chip manufacturing capability. It just happened a decade or so faster than anyone expected.
1. China is a huge emitter because it has a huge population. To say that its emissions are 'more than double the US', when it's population is more than TRIPPLE the US is a little unfair.
2. Rightly or wrongly, the world outsourced manufacturing to China. *Our* factories, making stuff for *us* to consume, happen to be located in China, causing emissions there. Those are our emissions, created by our lifestyles. We don't take responsibility for them, sure, but we shouldn't blame someone else.
"For phones I suspect that Huawei have simply taken the open source bits of Android and replaced the proprietary Google bits with their own or third party stuff. If they stick to maintaining close compatibility with Android then the app problem will be a lot more manageable."
YES PLEASE!
Android without the Google data harvesting, using the excellent Huawei hardware.
I'll even *consider* lining up to buy one of those.
The main problem with geoblocking like this is that it stops me (in Australia) using Amazon (in the USA) to buy stuff to send to a recipient in the USA.
I have family in the USA (and also other not-Australia countries too), and every Christmas or birthday I buy some tat on Amazon and have it shipped directly to my niece(s) and/or or nephew(s). That's *much* faster than shipping from Australia. And it's *much* cheaper too.
I'm sure this is a very common scenario.
With geoblocking, they simply won't take my money, so I'm forced to use some other web site.
Amazon - you're shooting yourself in the foot with this.
An excellent - very large scale, very efficient - energy storage technology is hydroelectricity.
Excess electricity is used to pump water uphill. That's right, pump water uphill into a dam.
The stored energy can be returned at any time by letting the water flow downhill through the hydoelectricity power station. The efficiency is superior (and the scale larger) than any battery.
This has been happening efficiently and reliably in Australia for many decades.
Look up Snowy Mountains Hydro Scheme for details.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowy_Mountains_Scheme
The Jindabyne Pumping Station is the main 'uphill' water pump for off-peak energy storgae.
http://services.eng.uts.edu.au/cempe/subjects_JGZ/eet/snowy2.pdf
Australia has a huge amount of coal, and coal fired electricity generators tend to produce excess electricity during off-peak hours (ie: at night). That excess is used to pump water uphill, which can be reclaimed later as hydroelectricity.
The only point of dispute after all these decades is this:
Is the resultant hydroelectricity *green* ?
(It makes a difference for tax incentives, and also for the right to sell to consumers as 'green power'.)
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
