Re: Astonishing isn't it
I'm surprised that somebody hasn't taken the operator to court for charging for a service that's not being delivered.
There must be some clever weasel-words in the contract.
526 publicly visible posts • joined 16 May 2015
Unless the government decides to fund the BBC directly, thereby making those of us who don't need a licence to pay into the fund.
The BBC is quite capable of funding itself through advertising. It happily does this for all of its overseas businesses. Channel 4 is owned by the government but doesn't receive a subsidy.
I received the letter, contacted them by phone and explained that I have various equipment such as a screen, laptop and smartphone, each of which is capable of being used to watch broadcast television.
As the current rule is that one must watch broadcast television or use iPlayer to view BBC output, being capable of watching is not the same as actually watching.
I don't watch television but do use a Sky box to listen to radio.
I now have a letter from them titled "Your No Licence Needed confirmation".
At no time did I give my name.
Don't forget that Pluto was discovered by an American. Losing "planet" status meant loss of face.
Since it is about one sixth of the mass of the Moon and 0.2% of the earth, it's not a major planet. Labelling Pluto, Eris etc as minor or dwarf planets, or "plutoids" seems a fair compromise.
Invoking "personal privacy" is complete nonsense. They're an organisation, not an individual. The reason they withhold the number is that they don't want you to be able to call them and reach the correct department. Much better to leave you to call the main number and fight your way through layers of menus and verbiage.
I've had legitimate calls from withheld numbers. I know they're legitimate because it's in response to an issue I'd raised and was expecting a call-back.
Even my bank tried that and asked me for security details. I explain that I never give security details to anyone who calls me, only to people I've called. In most cases they fully understand this. I can only think of one example, where I had terminated a mobile phone contract. Their number was not withheld but was unrecognised by my phone's address book. The guy got very annoyed when I refused to give any security details. On looking up the number later, it was their outsourced "retention team".
At end of contract, simply ask for the PAC to move your number to a different provider. They won't put you on to the porting team but to the retention team. Insist that you want to leave and eventually they'll offer you a much better deal. If they don't, you could always switch providers or even look what the best new deal is from your existing one.
Make sure you've done your research first (as always).
"And high-quality code was produced by the truckload then."
As was low-quality code. I know. I wrote some of it. Just as often, it was the specification rather than the coding that was at fault. Anybody remember Y2K. Plenty of COBOL written in the 1970's was not expected to last that long. Most didn't but some did.
Gathering data and making it available to others are two different issues.
Making it available to the interested party for them to challenge and correct is sensible. Making it public is not.
I wonder whether the UK government's policy of making the electoral register available is covered by GDPR. Until now, it has been made available to anybody who pays for it, after mandating its collection under threat of severe penalty to the individual if they refuse to supply it.
In most cases, the copyright on music is not held by the musicians but by corporations.
There's also copyright on the tune, the lyrics, the arrangement as well as the original recording and any tweaked version of the recording. This whole thing is a lawyer's wet dream, especially since they're not mandating registration of copyright.
You'll also find that a lot of corporately-produced music no longer specifies the start-date of the copyright.
This is being initiated in the USA but will be enforced worldwide, as the Disney Law was.
I too prefer the Win7 UI but Win10 can be persuaded to look and feel pretty much like Win7.
As a pure developer, my preference is for a solid colour desktop with no icons except the handful I put there to perform different functions with the same basic program. The couple of hundred programs installed on my Win7 box are easiest reached from the Start button.
In Win10 all my tiles have been removed, starting with the animated Live Tiles.
Flat is good because I've always disliked the 'pretty' icons of WinXP compared to Win2K as I prefer plain and frugal. Same with transparency. Bah humbug!
I assume that the Irish government will still refuse to let the USA have direct access to servers in Ireland.
A search warrant against specific individual individuals or countries causes no problem for the Irish. It's the direct access they object to, allowing the USA to use 'big data' methods.
I remember landing in Bangkok airport just after my daily connecting flight to Singapore had left.
Being there for 24 hours, I had to get a visa. $5 for neighbouring countries, $10 for Europeans and Canadians, $100 for USA citizens. Purely because the USA charged Thai people $100 for a visa.
This is 20 years ago but the concept remained in my head.
If software is not a good and not a service, I assume it must be treated as data (information) and can't be subject to tax. How can software and other copyright objects such as journalistic articles, music and video be legally defined as different to data? I can't see how pure data can be taxed. Then again, the UK doesn't tax books or newspapers but does tax the electronic versions of the same content. The original exemption of books and newspapers was to avoid a 'tax on knowledge' but that doesn't seem to have made it all the way into the 21st century.
We certainly encountered the question of downloadable software back in the 1980's when we uploaded our product to the customer using FTP. They told us that sending them a tape would make it taxable but electronic transfer would not. We did as the customer requested.