Obligatory one word question?
Why?
I mean its cool in many ways, but much like the Rad BASIC article.... Why?
660 publicly visible posts • joined 15 May 2015
OOh, that's quite interesting.
When you initially look at, you think there are loads of Starlink Sats up there...
What is clear thought is that when zooming in, there really aren't. Looking at the UK now, there are perhaps 3 or 4 over the UK in reality.
Where I am currently in Croatia.... not even that much.
Is one 'dot' one Satellite, or does it represent a small cluster?
Classic response, and works every time.
I use this methodology every time I find a server being used for prod, that isn't actually prod.... or when someone insists on using a server that actually isn't for that use... like a temporary box that's been superceded.
If I've asked them for several months (really) to change their code, I reserve the right to bork the connection. They've had long enough to sort it...
Have companies ever listened? (generally)
20 years ago, I worked for a company that took Gartners Magic Quadrant BS as 'the bible' to roadmap the company future....
I saw it then as it was - total utter bollocks
Gartners Euro headquarters are a mile from me. Never been tempted to sully my CV
You have a point technically that the SpaceX booster hasn't got off the pad yet.
I do however, as many others, have full confidence that Musk-produced kit will get off the pad successfully way quicker than the SLS kit even if the his tuff has an aberration or two beforehand.
It seems to me that all new Rovers are going to exceed life expectation by living most of it here on traditional terra firma!
By the time that the SLS actually works properly, we'll have all had a visit from the genuine 'Vulcans' and 'Klingons'.
Thing with this is that it's such a waste of time.
A former employer suddenly had to get certification, because a major worldwide supplier demanded it.
Cue months of wasted time.
Then every year or so, a BSI bod would come in an 'audit' us against the said document.
One week before.... "can someone update the documentation".
Cue 10 people spending the entire week doing their respective departments updates.
The auditor was an anal retentive, but there was never a big list of issues.
As far as the supplier was concerned, it was proof of the company being properly run etc.
I can tell you now.... it proves nothing, but earn some people big bucks, for very little real use.
Yet another oxymoron breaks out in to the public eye....
I always get nervous when everyone higher up seems to think that cloud vendors of anything can do the job ALWAYS better than the inhouse team.
Yet again, this is an example of 'outsourcing by another name' and 'this action shifts all responsibility from our company'...... no it doesn't.
In many ways the same thing.
The only thing that should be in 'keep your mouth shut, here a few $k-£k for your trouble' are items that disclose meaningful things to competitors - like your new product, genuine secrets
Outside of those, anything that impacts on the rights of an employee should be allowable, irrespective of prior coercion - sorry - agreement.
HCL have an office near me in Egham, Surrey.
I was even tempted to see what roles they had being relatively local.
One read of the JDs told me that it wasn't going to be a good place to be.
I can't put my finger on it, but it just didn't 'smell right'
Of course, they'd never get away with this bonus recovery trick over here, but they probably come from the same cloth as the P&O owner.
I do a lot of Python, and lighter stuff, so VS Code suits me fine for that,
The behemoth that is full-fat Visual studio is complete overkill in that use case IMO
On the other hand, if I'm fully in the MS ecosystem, doing .NET stuff, then there probably is an argument for full-fat first.
YMMV.
"The difference can be one index away"
Never a truer word spoken.
Increasingly, less and less attention seems to be paid to 'optimisation', purely on the basis of one mantra....
"Upscale the box(es) until the performance meets expectations"
I've seen a system go from 128GB instance to 512GB and higher in vain to get performance. This was based purely on the fact the db could be cached in memory. It doesn't fix locking issues.
Eventually, I was asked to take a look.. took me a morning to identify the central issue of indexing , or lack of it...
Everywhere I have ever been, whatever the tech, on-prem or in cloud...
IT' IS ALWAYS OVERPROVISIONED
And there is a reason for it.....
Nobody does any analysis of future growth in data, or usage.... None. There is no analysis of historical growth/usage to extrapolate from either. Experience tells every tech that if a BA or PM say 'we expect to need capacity for X rows etc' or whatever metric, that it is wildly wrong and you add 50% (seems to be the jist)
I have never known a BA/PM be remotely right. I've known the to be over optimistic, overly pessimistic - mostly the latter.
Ask a question like how has system growth been for the last 12months, nobody has a clue, because that level of gathering has never been done. Why? Because that involves expense to action.
Demon were my first ISP, and I stayed faithfully with them...Pricewise they were upper end, but they were bloody good. I moved off them when ADSL became popular and went to NDO.
NDO were also bloody good at the time. But like everything, they were taken over and it went to hell in a handcart..
Good memories!!
USR Robotics modems, and the fact I had to pay my phoneline into my parents (they couldn't stand the time I was online and they couldn't call when I was on!)