<q>The deal is companies publish user content with NO editing or changes or control and Section 230 protects them.</q>
Not true. §230(c) says
(1) Treatment of publisher or speaker
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
and §230(c)(2), which is a bit wordier, confirms that moderation of posts still doesn't create civil liability.
It was passed in response to Stratton Oakmont v Prodigy, in which a court found Prodigy, who ran a bulletin board, were liable for third-party content because they moderated posts, and Cubby v CompuServe, in which CompuServe were found not liable for third-party content because they made no attempt to moderate.
Without it the Internet would be very different; if it were revoked or weakened, anyone who currently allows comments, from X to the smallest website, would have two options: shut down their comments section, or leave everything up with no attempt to moderate comments.