Re: Pricing now corrected in the UK
They've reverted it to the pre-Brexit price.
4017 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jul 2007
So if you're going to put up with having the reduced functionality of Home for 30 days then you might as well have gone for Home in the first place.
If it doesn't do what it says on the tin then you should be rightly annoyed. Have a downvote (not often I dish those out).
...would he have deduced these are from some ancient installation, and why?
Well, if you're going to replace the keyboard you will probably get a new mouse too. So there is either a similar infestation of mice somewhere, or this is a dump of dumb terminal keyboards or rentokit have disposed of the mice.
If they were from dumb terminals then it is quite appropriate that they should end up filling a field.
The average business that is hell-bent on sticking data in the cloud needs to bear this in mind. You're buying into whole layers of sophistication that are totally unnecessary. One data repository and backups taken during pauses of data writing is all that many of us really want.
Sure, outages consequently mean inaccessibility to your data, but this is the price paid for being hell-bent on sticking data in the cloud. However, if you count up the risk points of failure of a cloud solution and compare that with the risk points of failure in an on-premises solution and draw your own conclusions.
I'll agree that github, et al are slightly different animals to say, accounts data, but anything basic that can be done in the cloud can be done on-prem. If bells-and-whistles are important then you're incrementing that risk points of failure counter.
I used to do a lot of work for a firm of solicitors in central London. I can't remember what the reason was now but I didn't want to do something that was going to disrupt everyone. So it was agreed I would go in, in the evening, do what I had to, and leave, and phoning for a minicab if needs be.
The firm was on the 2nd floor of what was effectively a large house with another firm of solicitors on the 1st floor and a bank on the ground floor. I went in, as agreed, did what I had to, rang for a cab, shut the 2nd floor office door, put the keys through the letterbox and made my way down to the ground to wait for the cab.
What I hadn't bargained for was someone working late on the 1st floor who left the building before me. He/she had dead-locked the front door to the building, so when I tried to get out, I couldn't. If only I hadn't been instructed to put the keys through the upstairs letterbox. The battery on my mobile had died by this time and I now had the minicab driver outside. I shouted through the letterbox to him, "I can't get out". He looked up and down, round about - where's that voice coming from? "Over here, I'm locked in." "Oh so you don't want a cab then." "Yes I do, but I'm locked in." Well miffed at being messed around, he went.
What would you do at this point? Think before you answer, and then read on.
Lots of things running through my head, my wife knew I was going to be late, but not as late as this could end up. Suppose the police think I'm a burglar, suppose the building caught fire, etc. Burglar? Fire? I know, I'll set off the alarm. The alarm company are sure to have details of the key-holder. So I did and it was your traditional very loud continuous bell.
The police pitched up. They see me looking through the letterbox. "Can you open the door please sir?" "I can't, I'm locked in." "Are these your premises sir?" Etc. etc. They believed my story after a few runs through it, including the minicab driver. "No we don't have keyholder details, sir. Nothing we can do, apart from informing your wife."
So I slept on the hallway floor with the alarm bell ringing. At about 7.30am the cleaners came in and nearly tripped over me.
So, take my advice, 6.30am has some advantages...
Yes, I should have been more specific about Netware. All the servers I ever setup were v3 and upwards.
Novell acknowledged Lantastic as a competitor by launching Netware Lite, but IIRC Lantastic was a far more sophisticated product.
Sage even dared to tinker in that market too, their selling point was that their network cards were incompatible with the competition, which Sage asserted was a good thing where confidentiality of accounts data was concerned.
Hats off to all the ethical people on this thread... worthy competitors if we were ever to meet in that context.
I've come across a lot that aren't, mind you. Here's a sample (I might have mentioned this one before, apologies if I have).
My biggest customer in my early days bought all their newer pc's from one of the lower tier manufacturers whose head office was only a few miles away. I would support the equipment they'd purchased from said manufacturer as well as supply other bits and bobs as required. One of the bits and bobs was a Logitech Mouse. In those days configuration involved a diskette (5.25" floppy). Supplied that, configured it and off I went.
Days/weeks later I had a very unhappy customer on the phone "You've given us a virus."
What had happened was that there had been a power surge which had taken out a few bits of electrical equipment, including one of these pc's (on the financial controller's (FC) desk). A guy from the pc manufacturer had gone in, replaced the motherboard in the pc and had suggested doing a virus scan on it using the latest "super duper" virus checker (which he was trying to sell, I can't remember if it was Dr Solomon or MacAfee). Anyway it found a virus and this guy implicated me as having spread it using the mouse software.
I went in and talked to the FC. I knew full well that he locked all disk media I gave to him in his safe. So I asked where the Mouse disk was. In the safe. Has it been outside of the safe since my visit? No. Right, let's do a virus check on it. (No virus found).
So where is the media originally supplied with the pc? In the safe. Has that been taken out the safe since being supplied? No. Right, let's virus check that. (Viruses found).
As the curtain came down the FC was thumping his fist on the desk, "get me that pc supplier on the phone, right now..."
There probably is no issue if democracy is an ongoing thing that is being voted upon. However....
I believe the problem lies with unstable or non-democratic regimes where there may become an absolute insistence on photographing one's ballot in order to determine good or bad actions, either against the person voting (bribery or repression respectively), or against the polling station where the vote is cast (oh look the polling station has caught fire, what a shame votes are unable to be counted).
By putting red tape obstacles in the path of such interference the general public is being protected for its own good... for a change.
The cynic in me suspects that this is done on purpose. So that when the Anti-Trust people come a-knocking on their door they could honestly say "Ooo, no, we can't remove Internet Explorer, everything else depends on it". (IIRC, an example of what I often used to illustrate systemic flaws in MS' design philosophy).