re: Atari Stella emulator
Wait, AI has cracked the taste of lager?
4256 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jul 2007
I would imagine that the way to truly assess chess computers is to open with non-standard moves which means there is no reliance on anything stored in its memory bank. All moves it makes must therefore be by sheer look-ahead slog. The interesting thing to surmise about this approach is that the AI might generate a killer opening sequence that gets inducted into chess literature.
After a few dozen of these revelations however, chess literature might have something to say about AI dross polluting games in a way that a true master would never contemplate. I think the phrase is that they lack elegance.
The hardware/software sold by these companies is commoditised to the hilt - manifested by wafer-thin margins. The Value Added component is, or should be security, but who takes that into account when doing their sales pitch? If the end-user wants "best price" above all else then this sort of event is going to continue.
What's wrong with choosing eg, 30.56?
Think about it. You ask an "intelligent" person to "guess a number between 1 and 50", how many of those people will (because they want to appear "super-intelligent") pick holes in your question, just to be contrary, and give an answer that answers the question, but does not answer the question that you intended to ask, which is likely to have been "guess an integer between 1 and 50".
So AI is not yet at the point where it is behaving like a smart-arse intelligent person.
Come back here tomorrow for a refund.
Last time I did that, and I reordered, the original items turned up. Contacted Amazon to tell them so, citing heaviness of items as reason for not returning them, and they told me to keep them. Anyone want some free fence spikes in West London and can collect, let me know...
Here's a complaint I made last year about their 99% Aberdeen Angus Burgers where they changed the recipe without changing the packaging:-
I wrote the following review of Iceland's Luxury 4 Ultimate Aberdeen Angus Quarter Pounders 454g earlier this week. My comment has apparently failed moderation, yet I note that I am not the only person to complain. The company has not been in touch with me about my review. See reviews (232 of them) here:-
https://www.iceland.co.uk/p/iceland-luxury-4-ultimate-aberdeen-angus-quarter-pounders-454g/66934.html
My review:-
"I've been buying these in-store since the pandemic because there's no onion in them and the meat content is high.
"Not any more. Been feeling quite sick since opening a new pack and finding the unmistakeable taste of onion. Yukh!
"Why does everyone insist on adding onions to burgers?
"And I swear the meat content used to be higher than 90%.
"Edit: This was the ingredients list for the burgers I have bought previously:-
Ingredients. icon. 3 ingredients. Aberdeen Angus Beef (99%), Salt, Ground Black Pepper.
"Anyone else feel that companies should alert customers with a change of packaging when ingredients change? Particularly where allergens not in the original product have now been included (wheat and barley in this instance)."
Current ingredients are:-
"Aberdeen Angus Beef (90%), Water, Onion, Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Rice Flour, Salt, Yeast Extract (contains Barley), Dextrose, Black Pepper, Black Pepper Extract."
The reason I am writing is that surely food companies should alert consumers if they change the allergens in their products without notifying us with some kind of change to the packaging, apart from the ingredients list? For the record I am mildly gluten intolerant and suffer the consequences if my intake goes above a certain level.
Let anyone bid that wants to bid, but weight scoring criteria such that the bad grapefruit are locked out.
Maybe this is already the case, which highlights the motleyness of the other contenders?
EDIT: I see Dan 55 has posted what should be the relevant link.
"Benefits to the vendor include its ability to display and market its capabilities, and the ability to fulfill a critical US Government technology gap on the world stage."
Yes, but is the taxman going to accept that it is tax-free?
Where is the can of worms icon?
We used them extensively in the degree I did (Electrical Engineering), until we were allowed to use calculators in exams. There were a few hold-outs in our class who used to use log tables, but they were slow to get the same results as us, and their ability to keep pace with the rest of the class was impaired as a result.
Advantages of a slide rule were that you were forced to think whether the result you were getting was of the right magnitude. With calculators and computers there is a tendency to treat results as gospel, regardless of how ridiculous they may seem. Slide rules also ensure you didn't go mad with the significant figures in the answer. Then there's the issue that Floating Point calculations can be extremely inaccurate if they are computed in the wrong way. Also, it educates one as to the visualisation of the number space. A good example of that is Benford's Law, which is self-evident when looking on a slide rule at the extent that the 1 to 2 markings take up.
For corporate use, a lot of email functionality should be instigated through a program that manages the business (one of those Enterprise thingamejigs). I've written many of these incorporating email client functionality, parsing data from messages that contain standardised data, and sending reports out in various formats looking as if it is a normal email. I use Delphi/XE for this and it works fine. I also am in touch with another Delphi dev who likes to drive Outlook using MAPI. Oh the anguish in making sure of the Outlook being used, integration with Anti Virus software and bloated pst's. Being completely isolated from mail client dependancy suits me just fine.
Continually incentivising AI progress with a monetary motive does not auger well for civilisation's future.
(So, if I were offered the job, would I take it? No, not unless there is a chance of embedding something deep in the bowels of AI that returns "um, er, my brain hurts" every time a question is asked).
I haven't visited this site for a long time. Tried to go into it, succeeded, but what a dog's dinner. The list of people in my network is scrunched up against the left margin. Never mind. Just on a quick inspection, at least two of the people on my list are deceased for certain*, another person appears twice (once with her maiden name, the other her married name). There are so many more out of date entries on there. My point is that this cannot be considered a reliable dataset to glean useful information from.
*Edit: Make that three - sad to hear "Mr Airfix" (Ralph Ehrmann) passed away in early 2023 RIP.
Without refreshing my study of this kind of thing, I would say that everything can be done using + (with or without carry), left shift and right shift. In terms of the underlying hardware logic components, everything can be built using either NAND or NOR gates. The TTL system's basic component is the 7400, which consists of four two-input NAND gates in one package. In addition (damn the pun) a system-wide gating pulse is needed to give the system some kind of memory.
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/sequential/seq_2.html
IIRC when I did the WordPerfect Certified Trainer course there was a trick question regarding the use of WordPerfect for calculation in tables where, if you blindly followed the instructions, you got an invalid answer due to arithmetic overflow of some sort. The candidate had to use their brain to figure out that the result was nonsense, and how to adjust the method to give the meaningful answer that was required.
I remember when decent calculators cost around £100. Who remembers Metyclean in Victoria Street which had all the latest gadgets? Sinclair (of C5 fame) arrived on the scene and started flogging Scientific calculators at a fraction of the cost. Only problem was that it would give a supposedly valid answer to say, doing the arcsine of, say 1.5, or the tan of 90 degrees, whereas the more expensive ones would throw an exception. Savvy lecturers could, of course, build such traps into their homework questions.