Re: Licenses?
CUDA is the undisputed king in AI/LLMs. It sounds like AMD decided to take its ball and go home. Either use HIPIFY or go home. Or go to nvidia, and let them increase their market share even more.
51 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Apr 2015
So true. Saying over and over that the only people worried about about recall are those who don't know how it works. I can just see that smug writer smirking at how they're so smart, 'If they were all as smart as me, they wouldn't be saying it's a privacy nightmare.' What a shill.
Yes, it should have been specified better. Giving exact ips is a big no no, but the first two octets is usually standard. Google provides that much, or at least it used to. So if you get a lot of clicks from a country you don't do business in, like say Malaysia or similar, you may be the victim of a click farm. Vpns also sometimes share similar ip numbers, but again, possibly clicks you don't want.
"As we see time and time again, billionaires tend to think they can do whatever they want, riding roughshod over communities and the environment, then build bunkers to hide in for when the consequences of their actions catch up with them. California Forever could be in for a rude awakening."
I know the reg has never tried to be objective. It bites the hand that feeds it, so of course they're skeptics. But this sentence shows that this article belongs on someone's personal blog. Seriously, is every writer for the reg a hack now? I almost miss that troll Orlowski. Almost.
Microsoft keeps trumpeting on how it offered 'deals' to its competitors. What are these 'deals' exactly? How much does Sony have to pay for the privilege of keeping CoD? And after the deal period ends, who's to say that Microsoft won't increase the fees 10x, or introduce other onerous terms? When publishers are independent, they want their software (games) on as many devices as possible. Microsoft has already shown its position on that, by announcing that Bethesda games (Elder Scrolls, Skyrim) will be Microsh*t only.
"It was reported earlier today that Uncle Sam was considering whether to probe the tycoon's ventures – such as Tesla and Starlink – for any national security issues, though the White House claimed there's no talk of that."
Musk doesn't want to provide internet indefinitely to Ukraine and Iran, and suddenly gets investigated for national security. What a coincidence.
"None of these sources refer to an inherent authority for a defendant or anyone else to challenge an allegedly defective warrant before it is executed."
No way to challenge a warrant's legality or defectiveness until it's it's executed. Then the government can say 'oops' but by that point it's too late. Only in America.