From Omni magazine, 1982...
https://archive.org/details/omnibookofcomput0000unse
"It's 2025 and they've closed down the museums. The works of the masters lie in the darkness of subterranean storage vaults. People don't need to see them anymore. Why should they? In the privacy of their homes, they can view the entire collections of the Louvre on 3-D entertainment modules or visit Michelangelo's Florence via electronic brain stimulation. No more hassles with crowds of tourists or with pompous tour guides.
"Home computer systems craft 400-page novels in hours, suited to the owner's personal taste, or duplicate the Mona Lisa from recyclable materials so that only a chemist could distinguish the copy from the original.
"In a robotic society we won't work. The robots will do most of the jobs more efficiently than we could do them. Such robots can usher in an age of super-abundant, very inexpensive goods. But there's a catch. If humans don't work, do they deserve to be paid? Where can they get the money to buy all the wonderful and inexpensive products the robots will produce?
"We can't have a society of unemployed people who can't afford the products made for them by the robots that took away their jobs. That's absurd. We must devise a scheme that will shift the manner in which we receive income without endangering either our standard of living or our self-respect.
"Robotics is the challenge of the future. The government could move us to accept it by forming a quasi-public agency to sell Victory Bonds for the Future. The money-gathering agency that issues the bonds might be called the National Mutual Fund (NMF). Here is how it might work.
"With the money it receives from public investors, along with money appropriated by Congress or gathered from other government sources, the NMF would build a significant supply of cash. The NMF can use this cash to finance companies that want to adopt robot technologies...
"Now let's look at the other side of robot economics: As the new technology expands, workers will be pushed out of jobs. We must plan to ease their discomfort and make up for their financial losses.
"One way would be to allow the workers to own the robots that replace them. As owners, they could lease the robots back to their former employers for use at their old jobs. The plan is highly speculative, of course...