as it slurps up Cumulus soon after swallowing Mellanox
yeah......yeah, I see what you did there......
40 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Feb 2015
As a private sector employee who regularly bids for and sometimes wins contracts, even Local Authority contracts, if I go over budget due to my lack of due dligence it's my tough titty. I suffer the financial consequences. Same as the penalties I face if go over time. Why is it with Government contracts (HS2, Carrier programme, Universal Credit etc. ad infinitum) that if you go over budget the Government just shells out the dough no matter how large. Over time? No problem.
Am I missing something really fundamental here? Do the Government write their contracts on the back of a fag packet?
I'm sure most of know about SugarCRM. An Open Source project for 14 years or so which churned out a fantastic product in the form of the Community Edition. Impressive work and one in the eye for the big boys in the CRM world.
But... greed took its toll and they decided to go 100% commercial and stopped the Community verson (i.e. free) in its tracks. So a big 'cheers for constructing our business model guys, we can afford our own developers now so sod off and do one'.
That is the problem. The developers don't want paying for their work, but you know, they'd like to use it!
When I dipped my toe into the Blackhat side of internet marketing I uncovered just how massive this way of scamming/spamming is. Indeed there's dozens of bot programs which can create thousands of accounts a minute on most major websites and then automatically schedule and post to those accounts, SENuke and Scrapebox being the most popular.
They're fire and forget - this guy didn't have to do much account creation. I would imagine the bulk of his work was in the wording of his tweets but even then those aformentioned programs can 'spin' the comments so they are unique all the time.
A firm of solicitors. A home hub. A flat network. An Asterisk pbx (nothing wrong with Asterisk in essence but their IT company is happy for them to use a BT home router as their firewall which makes me think the Asterisk config is also full of holes).
It should be the IT company being fingered for this but I suspect it's one of the solicitors relatives.
The problem with the Mars missions at the moment is similar to how the space programme was in the mid 70's in that people got bored of it. Same old, same old. Because of that the NASA budget was slashed and we didn't go to the moon anymore.
With NASA's budget again on a proverbial shoestring, rather than constantly send rovers to look at the geology of the red planet which the majority find boring (not me) why can't they stick a HD camera on top of one and stream it live 24/7 back to earth which will surely get the kiddos interested again and hence obtain a budget increase?
I know we currently suffer from bandwidth limitations but surely if they can land a rover on Mars in one piece then it's not beyond the realms of possibility is it?
BT and Sky have splurged gazillions on the rights to broadcast near permanent TV advertising sprinkled sparingly with live football.
Do adverts actually work? Do we see something like Pepsi and have an urge to buy a Pepsi?
No.
Maybe that's why they are advertising everything everywhere. Attrition. Someone, somewhere will buy it eventually.