Re: Remember open source is cancer
I’m pretty sure Balmer would have upvoted that.
3890 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jan 2015
Good one!
First it has to be discovered.
Then someone with deep pockets and an incentive has to bankroll a legal process that can take years or decades.
Then you have to win.
Then you have to overcome any challenge to higher courts.
Then you have to get paid.
Then you have to distribute the payment to those affected. I don't think a general fine does that, does it?
"Today's decision does not address ValueLicensing's core complaint that we gave customers the option to apply the value of their licenses for older products to new cloud subscriptions rather than selling them to third parties.
We continue to believe that was both legal and the right thing to do. Helping our customers move to the cloud improves productivity and security"
WTH sort of an argument is that? We know what's best for you?
I get that. But email and SMS are non-proprietary, and most SMS messaging apps have alternative delivery systems for when you are connected to the Internet.
I don't get why people are so eager to jump into proprietary systems? It's like they long to be owned.
WhatsApp is owned by Meta, I believe (the Facebook owner).
Just like with material things, you can’t take experiences with you when you die.
A pleasant life is far more valuable than a stressful one.
I had to look it up, and there really is such a magazine as The Idler. Issuing bi-monthly however, seems a bit OTT.
Define "used"? Contaminated somehow?
"It means facilities return more water to the environment than they consume, via measures including rainwater capture or other treating waste water for reuse."
Right. So, otherwise, what would have happened to the rainwater?
These are bizarre CEO and MBA type statements.