Re: Extra Security...
Interesting how you get vastly different results on Google Images for Treet vs. Treets (regional settings may also affect the results).
869 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jan 2015
How true. I'd already posted some time ago what I thought of Verify. So for my last tax return, I thought I'd use Gov Gateway instead. Alas, failure there too, I'd probably set up an account in a previous life, but the system was utterly unable to let me retrieve my identifiers.
So it was back to Verify. That's when I discovered that RoyalMail had disappeared from the list of providers, and I had to create a brand new account with PostOffice. Miraculously, it worked on first attempt, but I don't know what's in store for the next time I try it.
and eBay.
Whenever I login, they ask me to confirm my mobile number (not sure where they got it in the first place). I always reply 'Maybe later' as I don't want to lie 'I don't have a mobile number'. My profile information has no phone number.
Last month I made an order. A few days later, I get a text from DHL informing me of a planned delivery. So DHL got my number from the vendor. Now who did the vendor get my number from?
Train to Edinburgh, not surprising given the rip-off prices of British rail.
I was specifically referring to London<->Paris trips for which you don't have that many direct flights. I just checked on our company travel website, plane tickets from London to Paris are typically 20% to 100% more expensive than Eurostar, so maybe the "much more" was a bit of a stretch, but there's very little reason to prefer the plane for center-to-center journeys between these 2 cities.
And in the private sector
And not just for goods.
A colleague is visiting from India. First London then Paris. We normally (and sensibly) use Eurostar for London-Paris trips. But guess what? The travel booking tool in India only allows air transport for that, no train! So he'll be paying much more for plane tickets, plus taxi to and from airports (no one in Accounting will bother him about Tube being far cheaper), not counting all the wasted time in airport transfers, check-in and luggage collection. But that's ok cause it's all in policy!
IIRC, the ISS needs constant maintenance, so you can't leave it unmanned for long periods. This was a cause of recent concern as a failed supply mission raised the possibility that the crew might have to abandon the station if a new cargo didn't arrive in time.
So if what you need is a Big Garage in the Sky with no crew on it, the ISS is probably not your best choice.
So, if and when it's discovered, will boffins throw a new contest to decide its name? Let's see what the conditions could be this time:
- must be named after a Roman divinity, bonus points if representing a visible minority
- Mickey Mouse's pet dog not allowed
- name must be 8-16 characters long, including at least 1 digit and 1 special character
- name must not be offensive to Donald Trump or Kim Jong-Un
- name can't be translated to Niney Mc Nineface in any terrestrial or extraterrestrial language
- submissions must be filed in a cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeus#Consorts_and_offspring is a good place to start and lists more than 300. -a and -e endings reduce that to about 130, of which you need to remove those already taken as moons of Jupiter or other celestial bodies (found several asteroids).
From those that don't appear to be taken, I would like to see that one Dike:
Dike left Earth for the sky, from which, as the constellation [Virgo], she watched the despicable human race. After her departure, the human race declined into the Bronze Age, when diseases arose and they learned how to sail.
If you're referring to Fig 21 in the paper, KeePass comes out with 2 Green and 2 Amber, that's the best score of the 5 surveyed tools.
Assuming 2 points for Green, 1 for Amber, 0 for Red, you get the ranking: KeePass > 1Password4 > Dashlane > LastPass > 1Password7.
YMMV if you weigh the weaknesses differently.
Yes, I've noticed that every time I change my default search engine to DuckDuckGo or Qwant, it's not long before I revert to Google. Old habits die hard I guess, and I always have that uncomfortable feeling that i'm missing some results, so I switch back to Google just to compare and don't bother to change back.
Maybe next time I'll try harder (famous last words).
Credentials apparently weren't exposed
Not this time, but I was following up on a comment about the Heartbleed attack that hit them in 2014. Even the site's founder got her credentials publicly exposed.
it's way over the heads of "normal" users
I tend to disagree. Yes, it's highly configurable and extendable, and has advanced features that require some RTFM, but for a standard user all it takes is a few clicks to create a new entry and generate a unique secure password that will be accepted by most sites, which is all they need.
and the data breach would have occurred just one month before the change? Sounds more likely to me that it could have happened anytime up to December 2014.
Also, moving to a "more secure algorithm for storing passwords", probably means the previous algorithm was MD5 hash, so all leaked passwords have been pwned for 4 years.
IB are more and more risk averse. They now prefer the safe and steady revenue streams of sales and arbitrage to the risks of trading for their own. Plus the regulatory constraints make it more and more costly to perform their activities. A lot of IB have been shutting down or reducing their prop trading activities in the last years.
Sure, but I'm not convinced this is the main obstable to switching mobile providers as the article suggests. Number portability could be a blocking point, although from personal experience I found it to work quite well (PAC number easy to obtain, switch scheduled within a few days, happens on the given date with minor loss of service), but YMMV.
Not if done by your operator, that's the initial business model for this phone and why it's locked to a provider. This was explained in the previous article when Verizon launched it in the US:
Inside is a non-removable nano SIM that mirrors your primary SIM, much like an eSIM-enabled Apple Watch mirrors your iPhone.
But from this article it sounds that Vodafone is not offering this feature yet.