
Re: Orbital inclination
I can suggest better options. "55° 45' 7.284" N 37° 37' 2.998" E" comes to mind.
812 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jan 2015
Quote me one single cloud provider that pretended you could get rid of your IT Security department when migrating to the cloud. Securing IAM is and has always been the customer's responsibility.
And frankly, credentials security is not rocket science. Implement Federation authentication so that your users don't need another set of username/password. Use MFA. Use roles (i.e short-lived access rights) in your cloud infra instead of long term credentials. If you do need long-term credentials, rotate them regularly. Block all public access (now the default for most CSPs anyway). Monitor all accesses. The tools are there, just use them!
Lever balances and, even worse, electronic balances have detached people from thinking about what underlies their accuracy, what the accuracy is or even if it exists. It's just numbers from a machine accepted uncritically in much the same way as so many social media users accept conspiracy theories.
Thanks for helping me realize that I was falling victim to conspiracy theories every time I use my calculator or my electronic balance. Of course I would blindly accept that 24x78=1.234E94, or would never suspect that I've messed up the tare if my 2 spoons of olive oil weigh 512 g.
I use these tools not out of detachment from reality, but because they're convenient, reliable and save me time. This is why people have been inventing things for millennia.
Binary-based units are natural for weighing things
Only if you ever need to measure things in ratio of 2. What if you need 5/7 of a pound?
The benefits of metric/decimal system are not so much in the base unit (10 only has factors of 2 and 5, so it doesn't divide as easily as 12 or 60), but in its consistency: you always use the same ratio to move up or down from one unit or sub-unit to the other, whether you measure lengths, weights or volumes.
Since we are only interested in opt-out metrics due to the low value of opt-in metrics, we must accordingly never collect any personally-identifiable data. We must also not collect any data that could become personally-identifiable if combined with other data, which notably means IP addresses must not be stored. We only want to collect anonymous data anyway, but we need to be especially mindful of the possibility that combining two "anonymous" data points could result in the data no longer being anonymous.
I'm sorry, but when you say "We know it has happened", it does sound like you do more than support the idea.
So far, I have not seen ANY support for a counter to that idea.
And I've not seen any support for the idea that there isn't a teapot orbiting the Sun between Earth and Mars, therefore it must exist. After all, there is already a Tesla up there.
We would, and we know that's what happend: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laschamp_event
If you want to convince us, don't quote an article that lays doubts on your claim:
"However, the lack of corroborating evidence of a causal link between the Laschamp event and population bottlenecks of many megafauna species, and the relatively moderate radio-isotopic changes during the event, have cast significant doubt on the real impact of the Laschamp event on global environmental changes."
There is actually no consensus on the correlation between a reversal of polarity and extinction events, except maybe in the Doctor Who-verse.
a bank will only accept it if it is being paid into an account where the holders name is some reasonable permutation of John Smith.
In practice, cheque cashing is automated and there are no checks (CHECKS, not CHEQUES! See?) on the intended beneficiary. Banks will only investigate if you contest where the funds have been transferred to and compare the name on the paper (or more probably the scanned copy) with the one on the account.
The rendering is surprisingly fluid on the demo video, but the poor resolution and black&white display would make it very difficult to play once you've passed the first levels, unless you're so familiar with the game that you could play with your eyes closed. Monsters are only visible in close range and items such as locks and keys hardly at all.
Still, as a wise man said: 'Completely useless, so absolutely necessary!'
True, but all of these measures could easily turn into hundreds of pounds anyway, depending on the size and traffic of your website.
Also, weird that he only recommends the migration to owners of hacked sites, surely you'd want to do that *before* you get hacked if you're serious about security? (yeah, I know...)