This is not going to be a popular opinion on here, but I kind of think the court made the right decision here. At point of purchase, there was nothing deceptive going on - exactly what was promised and sold for that price was provided.
To use a car analogy (shudder), if I buy a car and I don't ever listen to the radio in it, instead preferring to install a different model of stereo of my choice, would I be entitled to go back to the manufacturer and return the original unit and ask for a refund of the value of the original stereo?