Re: Toilets, health trackers, sexual innuendo
Dabbsy, after all these years, you're clearly starting to rub off on the other Reg reporters!
15 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Oct 2014
"you just can't protect yourself against your own users"
There is no silver bullet to security and multiple layers of defence should be used. Of-course, anti-virus can only protect for known issues. As for your own users, using a solution that enables white listing of running processes is going to help.
Ford has invented a machine called a 'car', to replace your horse and cart!
Really El Reg, this is not news. Google has been working on this for a number of years, as you can see from the git project check-in dates. They also did a presentation with Q&A on how they manage their own Mac estate, which included this tool, amongst others and freely available for all to watch. The presentation can be seen here:
https://www.usenix.org/conference/lisa13/managing-macs-google-scale
Imagine the scenario before going on stage: -
Butterfield: "Hey Bob, I really admire you and the work you've done. I think you're one of the greatest actors of our time. Nobody really knows who I am yet, but I'd really could do with getting my name out there. If you wouldn't mind having a dig at me out there, it would really make my night."
Bob: "Sure, no problem".
And the rest is history.
"Similarly, systems to automate parking and direct cars to empty spaces will require cars to be integrated with municipal systems and those of private parking operators."
What's going to stop the private parking operators paying subsidies to the companies which drive the data systems, to encourage their overly priced parking facilities to be preferred over cheaper or even free parking?!
After having used Deluxe Paint on an Amiga and then getting a PC, I discovered the wonders of Photoshop and have used it ever since; now, mostly for photography.
I worked in the video game sector for 10 years and many of the artists used Photoshop as they had "acquired" it when they were at school and taught themselves how to use it. Of-course the companies they went on to work for would spend the huge amounts of money required for all their employees to have Photoshop.
If Adobe insist on only having a subscription model, I expect things to change in the longer term. Kids of today will find a competitor's product which does what they need and will use that instead. When they grow up, they may no longer have Photoshop skills required in the corporate world and either companies will have to pay for training, or switch to a cheaper product. I know which I'd prefer!
Take, for example Pixelmator for OS X, it's just £22 to own, from the App Store, getting rave reviews and some professionals are starting to use it too. I think Adobe should watch their backs!
When Apple announced the Apple Watch, I thought "that's cool", and was impressed with the keynote presentation. Had Apple had them (iPhone and Watch) to buy the day after the announcement I may have even been tempted; definitely with the phone and maybe with the watch, but since bought a Moto X.
Having had time to think about the watch, what's the point? Unless you're really into sport and want to monitor everything you do, or take a lot of flights, which most of us don't, I don't see the fascination of this product, or am I missing something?
In addition, as an OS X developer I have no inclination to write apps for this product. Am I an exception here?