There's a burger van in my town that has no fewer than three Michelin
tyres.
768 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Oct 2014
One of my customers has one of these clusters, so this has ended up on my desk.
You get to install a clunky browser-based thing called Windows Admin Center™. Sometimes it installs, sometimes it doesn't.
That's what you use to access the command line on each host. No matter how hard I try, I can't get the UK keyboard to work inside these sessions. So doing anything that involves \ or | or whatever requires the old ALT - numeric keypad kung fu like it's 1990.
The command line syntax changes every two weeks. I spoke to a bloke in tech support at the supplier that installed the whole thing the other day, he said even though he and his colleagues know the commands off by heart, they have to look them up every time because they will have changed. The knock on effect is that the documentation is always out of date, and ChatGPT tells you to do stuff that doesn't work.
The thing requires its very own Windows domain, just to offer it Storage Spaces Direct.
Well there's a surprise.
Anyway, they wouldn't have destroyed that HDD at all. It would still have been under warranty with the manufacturer, so they would have sent it back to Seagate or Western Digital or whoever and gotten a replacement. Your faulty HDD would have then gone to somewhere in the Far East and refurbished.
I have never seen that Rob Roy thing in my life, it must have not been on the European CD. I think I've still got an OEM copy of Windows 95 on CD here, but I'm not going to open the shrink wrap to find out.
(Collectors' Item you see...)
Hover wasn't at all bad, good value for money. Quite liked that.
You ideally want to locate a data centre so that it can be fed from two separate electrical supplies, from different providers, coming into the site from opposite sides. There are certain places where that's geographically doable, others less so.
If you just have one electricity supply, then you're got a Tier 1 data centre. Not a lot of point to that due to that single point of failure.
And you're both missing the point.
The point is not to take a child's toy and take the fun out of it. The point is to take a standardised set of components and get software to come up with a design that isn't going to fall apart / fall over. And this is clearly the first iteration of the thing. The end goal is something much more complex.
Well DUH
If you walk around all day carrying a small and powerful computer running a complex operating system which by definition will contain bugs and you're of interest to someone somewhere, then you're gonna get fucked over.
See the book "Pegasus: The Story of the World's Most Dangerous Spyware" by Laurent Richard and Sandrine Rigaud