Re: I'll be sticking with petrol (or diesel) for my next car.
There are a couple of standard pieces of anti-EV FUD in there.
The first is "batteries conk out." EV batteries are modular and, if a battery module fails, it can be replaced for hundreds rather than thousands. Compare your fossil-powered engine, where the failure of a piston ring will necessitate lots of labour to rebuild the engine, or a complete new engine for a similar price to a complete new EV battery pack.
The failure mode that is happening with EV batteries is wear: which means their capacity and so range reduces. So your EV which previously did 200 miles now only does 190 miles (about what has happened to mine after 50,000 miles and 5 years of driving.) But even when it has been driven 100s of 1000s of miles and is reduced to 100 miles range, it is still useful to someone. When your diesel Kia has a worn-out engine it will be scrap value.
The second piece of FUD is "move the emissions from my tail pipe to a gas fired power station." Firstly the gas-fired power station extracts far more work from a given amount of fuel than your car ever will, because there are no requirements for a power-to-weight ratio in a fixed power station. Secondly the emissions that are giving little Timmy next door his asthma attacks are best moved to the power station, where scrubbers can remove the nitrogen oxides from the exhaust in a way your car never can -- that power-to-weight ratio again.
But the last point is the big one. If you buy a brand new diesel car, it will spend the next few decades being powered by diesel. If you buy a brand new EV the fuel used will change according to the fuel mix used for the grid. So, even if it is fossil-powered today, who is to say it will still be fossil-powered in 20 years?
There are real problems with widespread EV adoption -- lack of affordable overnight charging is the biggest one -- but most of what you've read about EVs is FUD. Check it first!