Weeks, NASA can't plan a meeting in weeks. That was the giveaway.
55 posts • joined 6 Aug 2014
Musk isn't banned from tweeting, he's only banned from tweeting lies - thanks to his SEC fraud case settlement.
If this production news was true he could have tweeted it - but he didn't.
Seems like Musk needed a new route for dishonest communication, hence the recent *leaked* emails.
They need to be much better than the 'average' driver, machines killing people at the same rate as clumsy people is not going to be acceptable.
One way to make sure they're good enough is to make the CEO (and other Board members) personally liable for their systems mistakes as if they were at the controls.
"Basically it means Apple owns your device, not you, and could conceivably disable it remotely if they detect unauthorized repairs going on."
I think that's a bit paranoid. More likely it's a mechanism that ensures the machine has not been tampered with. I wouldn't be surprised if this could be enabled on machines sold to some business or government to allow them to verify the integrity of the hardware in their machines as part of an overall digital security effort.
Apple products are so second-rate, every single one of them, it's astonishing what can be sold to idiots through slick marketing. They should be congratulated.
Honestly, 8 years late with OLED, 6 years late with wireless charging, 4 years late with fast charging, no expandable storage in phones, most expensive devices, most delicate devices, buggiest mobile OS, most dongles, fewest ports, proprietary connectors, no touchscreens on laptops, useless siri, the watch, those earpods, the $300 speaker. There's not a single Apple product that has any merit at all and there hasn't been for years.
They're at it again, 'boffins' pretending that bacteria is the same as 'space aliens'. They're not, no-one cares if an asteroid, or mars, or one of Jupiters moons has some bacteria on it, even less so if it's long dead bacteria. No-one ever wrote a Sci-fi film where the humans leave earth in a huge ship, spending decades in 'stasis' to reach another solar system and find some microbes.
'Boffins' stop pretending that your life's work and all the funding are worthwhile because you found 3 billion year old fossils that are evidence of some prehistoric bacterial life. Unless it has a weapon or at least is more intelligent than my dog I don't want to know.
Vendors are not "forced to include Google search", they can take the freely available Android source code and build an OS with whatever pre-installed and pre-configured junk they want, but if they want to put google services & the google play store on it they have to comply with Google's rules - nothing wrong with that.
Users can choose to buy phones from vendors who provide regular updates, they have a free choice.
I only buy phones with 'standard' Android builds because all those skinned and modified Android implementations are inferior. I'm buying it for Google's services, I don't want a phone full of inferior adware, junkware and half-baked & buggy OS modifications which is what the EU seem to think we want.
But more importantly where is the 4.43 billion Euro's going? Is it going to the consumers it is claimed were disadvantaged or is it going into EU coffers to help pay their outrageous pensions?
Apple can't even make their wireless charging mat work, it's still not on sale nearly a year after being announced, Apple are not taking the lead in this area. There will be no across the room / in your pocket wireless charging because all methods for transmitting significant amounts of energy beyond a few mm are hopelessly inefficient unless they're focussed and then they're inherently dangerous. How many times will this nonsense story be ressurected?
I guess if you don't like it you shouldn't use it, but Android without Google will just be a useless OS with no market share and poor functionality. I imagine the same people post on Windows PC stories suggesting people adopt Linux on their PC's - a sure way to make a PC almost useless.
Frankly I see these 'we're being tracked' stories all the time and it comes down to the same thing, basement dwelling, tin-foil-hat wearing nobodys imagining their lives are of interest to others. But you're not that interesting (nor am I) the idea that anyone is looking at you as an individual is a fantasy and frankly it's pathetic.
I still think most people dripping about the issue are worried about their habits being recorded because they're illegal.
"A user DOES NOT NEED A GOOGLE ACCOUNT to use Google Maps"
But to make it work for navigation on your phone you do and it's worth every bit of information Google collect. It's better than any sat-nav, better than any system supplied in any car. No contest whatsoever.
It even keeps a very accurate record of all your journeys, great if you want to remember what you did six months ago for your business mileage claim, not so good if you're a travelling rapist or serial killer.
I'm not using Android 5 (or earlier), even if I was I really don't mind if the ad says "Happy Birthday John, your favourite beer is on special offer just for you", how is that intrusive? I don't consider my name or date of birth to be a secret.
I don't run any apps that point to any strange passtimes or perversions, I'm pretty normal. As I said in my original comment I suspect it's mostly perverts and criminals dripping about being 'tracked', maybe people having affairs too or other dishonest folk, they need to be careful I get it.
But do you people really think you keep your names and addresses secret? How do you get stuff delivered? How do you rent a car? How do you get a mobile phone? How did you open a bank account? How did you get a credit card? How did you get a job? How many people look at your passport or driving licence, how many hotels have photocopies of those documents? Waaaaaaaaa company A knows what I bought from company B, waaaaaaaaa the sky is falling. Do you realise how ridiculous you sound?
I just don't inderstand why people get so worked up about this issue, you're going to see ads so why not see ads that are relevant to you? Personally I'm happy to have 'free' high-quality services like Google navigation and Gmail with the only 'cost' being ads that I never click anyway.
I always assume those who drip about being 'tracked' are up to no good. Perverts and Criminals probably.
In fact, since passenger cars are required to go through a type-approval process (and the Euro-NCAP in Europe) I'm surprised Tesla are allowed to develop, test (hopefully) and roll-out an update to the brakes (in just a few days).
Surely an update that alters the performance of the braking system requires approval by the authorities that originally type approved the vehicles in different regions.
"when the original iPod launched in 2001 the state of the art for music lovers who wanted variety on the run was a portable CD player and a wallet in which to store lots of discs"
That's Apple fan drivel, in 2001 portable CD players were still common but many portable MP3 players existed before the ipod, all the ipod brought to the market was slick advertising and white headphones.
Yes, to make the devices smaller & lighter, improving aesthetics while also withstanding knocks and general handling they're glued together. Why is this a problem? What are you going to replace? The CPU and RAM will be soldered to the board anyway to meet the cost/packaging criteria. The story is idiotic because there are plenty of options for people who want to be able to dismantle and 'upgrade' their laptop, but it'll be bigger, uglier & heavier than this one. It's like buying a sports car and complaining that it's not as roomy or economical as your old mini-van.
Stop dripping nerds, this is the future, it's disposable.
"Huawei has managed to chop the thickness down from 10.1 to 7.3 mm, making it much easier to manipulate."
The Nexus 6 (like other Motorola phones) has a curved back, while it might be 10.1 mm thick in the centre it's much thinner at the edges, the result is a device that's much more comfortable to hold than a thin flat phone.
Those who get upset by the 'denier' tag are idiots, it's a distraction and it works a treat every time. The entire thread of discussion here is dominated by people crying about being labelled a 'denier', so what get over it and discuss the issues.
The warmists know there's no actual evidence to support CAGW, just a theory and computer models programmed to run that theory. So stop letting them distract you with name calling. Fools.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020