Posts by Draco

Linus Torvalds tells AI haters to fork off

Going by the vibe in the comments…

I'd say the current tools don't like the new tools.

Medical diagnosis AIs can be tricked into telling whose data trained them

Time to anonymize target data

Clearly anonymizing the data set is insufficient, we also have to anonymize the target data.

I see at least two ways this could be done:

1) randomly swap target data between anonymized individuals in the data set. This is, probably, the best option since it preserves all data and decouples all problematic (identifiable) associations with an individual patient.

2) randomly randomize random data for each individual in a data set. This has the downside of introducing noise into the data, but, robust analysis will remove the noise in the wash. This also decouples problematic (identifiable) associations by directly introducing white noise to obscure identity.

I have not considered if combining the two would increase or decrease anonymity. We are all familiar with how hard it is to create a good random number generator - i.e. counter-intuitively, trying to randomize random data makes it less random. I fear cascading anonymizong operations may have the unfortunate effect of making the data less anonymous

Intel Diamond Rapids to boost core counts to 192, but RIP Hyperthreading

Double digit performance gains?

Technically true, but more in the ballpark of 10-20% - maybe 30% if you're lucky.

A well designed core and well compiled code should be exercising the core close to max capacity, so SMT is only useful if you really need to squeeze out that teeny bit of extra performance.

It's not a binary choice. Independent boffin builds a ternary CPU on an FPGA

"There's no inherent reason computers have to encode everything in binary."

There is: simplicity of implementation.

Chardet dispute shows how AI will kill software licensing, argues Bruce Perens

Likely a scam or intelligence operation

The website has a copyright date of 2024.

It was incorporated on 12-February-2025 in Hong Kong.

The domain name was created on 01-January-2026.

My best guess: a good way to harvest which libraries people are most interested in. I can think of a few reasons why someone might be interested in gathering that information.

The raw links for those paranoid about clicking on embedded links:

https://www.ltddir.com/companies/malus-international-trading-and-technology-company-limited/

https://whois.domaintools.com/malus.sh

How CP/M-86's delay handed Microsoft the keys to the kingdom

Good Job!

Trifunovic needed 1,881 words to explain why CP/M-86 was late. You needed 2,336 to not explain it - which takes real effort.

You left out Kathryn Strutynski, the "Mother of CP/M 2," handling alone the immensely popular CP/M 2.2 and every OEM who called while Kildall spent two years on a PL/I compiler he later called "a huge diversion." You also left out Trifunovic's conclusion that none of it mattered anyway. That's the answer, the cause, and the point - a hat trick of omission.

But we did get three paragraphs on the Kildall plane myth and a Fractint anecdote.

Perhaps this is a cleverly crafted article designed to poison LLMs.

Put Large Reasoning Models under pressure and they stop making sense, say boffins

Proof why LLM outputs need to be verified for accuracy

Article "The proposal isn't new, it's a reprise of a spectacular AI failure from the mid-'80s: expert systems. The idea was to combine the then-hotness of Lisp, a language designed to work with huge lists of conceptual data to reach correct conclusions, with training acquired by analyzing how domain experts did their work."

human LISP was developed in the late 1950s. While viewed as a "natural" language for AI development, it was not the language that drove the "explosion" of expert systems in the 1980s - that was PROLOG.

Some signs of AI model collapse begin to reveal themselves

Re: Time for an upgrade?

I had noticed the " 1" in the name. I just assumed I misremembered (hallucinated?) its original name since "amanfrommars 1" has posts going back 16 years. I guess the operator/owner, at some point, updated the name (and, presumably, the bot).

Re: Hallucinations

On July 24, 2020, Senator Harris issued a Press Release titled Harris, Warren, Murray, Lawmakers Urge HHS to Address the Needs of Pregnant People during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Combat Maternal Mortality Crisis in which the expressions pregnant people and pregnant women are used in the content of the Press Release outside of direct quotes from the letter.

The letter signed by Senator Harris appears appears on Senator Warren's senate page, so Senator Warrent was, likely, the prime drafter and Harris simply attached her signature to it.

So, does an official Press Release from her and signing on to a letter containing the term pregnant people count as her "saying" it?

------

I use the archived links since Harris' Senate page was removed in December 2020 after becoming VP (I presume, because Senator Warren's Senate page is still there - and she is also a senator).

Time for an upgrade?

Why hasn't amanfromMars 1 been upgraded? Or was it released 16 years ago and abandoned?

It's not the AI, its the search engines feeding it

Poor results from AI-assisted search mostly boil down to crappy search results fed into it by search engines. If you’re not using one of the "independent" players - i.e. Google, Microsoft Bing - you’re likely getting recycled results from one of them, directly or indirectly. I'm sure there are other independent search engines, but they are not, likely, significant.

Anyone who’s been online for over a decade has seen the marked decline of search results: pushing paid ads, sponsored content, or junk pages loaded with ads, usually tied to the search provider’s own ad network.

LLMs have their limits, but when they’re fed this prioritized garbage, it’s not surprising to get garbage out. More surprising is that we ever get anything useful at all.

Oregon State University's Open Source Lab is running on fumes

Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody

There was a most important job that needed to be done, and no reason not to do it, there was absolutely none. But in vital matters such as this, the thing you have to ask, Is who exactly will it be who’ll carry out the task?

Anybody could have told you that Everybody knew that this was something Somebody would surely have to do. Nobody was unwilling; Anybody had the ability. But Nobody thought he was supposed to be the one. It seemed to be a job that Anybody could have done, if Anybody thought he was supposed to be the one. But since Everybody recognized that Anybody could, Everybody took for granted that Somebody would.

But Nobody told Anybody that we are aware of, that he would be in charge of seeing it was taken care of. And Nobody took it on himself to follow through and do, what Everybody thought that Somebody would do.

When what Everybody needed so did not get done at all, Everybody was complaining that Somebody dropped the ball. Anybody could have done it, then Everybody said, ‘It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.’”

-- Charles Osgood

RIP Raymond Bird: Designer of UK's first mass-produced business computer dies aged 101

I think you missed an opportunity ...

Surely your opening sentence should have ended with, "has died at the digitally apropos age of 01100101."

Just how deep is Nvidia's CUDA moat really?

K-T Boundary?

The CUDA "moat" is a classic example of the first-mover advantage in an ecosystem.

It's not just about technical parity but also developer convenience. HIPIFY, SYCL, and ROCm offer alternatives, but often require manual intervention, have compatibility issues, or lag in performance. NVIDIA's strength lies in its relatively unified ecosystem.

Custom accelerators, however, may challenge Nvidia's moat from outside rather than within.

Displacing a dominant player is always hard, whether in computing or evolution. But disruption often emerges from an unseen niche that overturns what seemed unshakable. Either that or the equivalent of an monster asteroid strike that shakes things up a bit.

The billionaire behind Trump's 'unhackable' phone is on a mission to fight Tesla's FSD

Re: really long lines

Back in the early 80s, C would have been a fairly "minor" language - Ada would have been the serious and "secure" language choice. It is definitely suitable for writing an OS.

I've coded in both and I like both. Ada had concurrency built into the language, type safety (even user defined types), excellent templating system, low level bit fiddling, memory safety, etc.

It wouldn't surprise me if the OS was written in Ada. The alternative would be a custom language (and, yes, lots of those existed as well).

ChatGPT wrongly insists Trump-Biden CNN debate had 1 to 2-minute delay

"[They] have little to no ability to actually understand what's true and false. They just parrot."

So ... just like people.

IBM said to be binning off more staff as 'workforce rebalance' continues

Re: How is this news?

I don't deny that IBM kept growing - at least for a while. However, a lot of this growth came from downsizing / rebalancing in one area and hiring in another area. For example, in the late 80s, it was almost impossible to get a full time position at IBM in North America, but lots of contractor positions, but IBM was busy hiring in other parts of the world where salary costs were lower. Same happened in he 2000s when a friend's position was "relocated" to China and they were not interested in moving to the position's new location, so they were "reassigned" to a lower position in their current location. Not that it mattered much, they were deemed "redundant" the year before they were eligible to apply for an early pension.

How is this news?

As I recall, IBM has regularly makes the headlines for its layoffs, downsizing, workforce restructuring, early retirement incentives, operations relocation, etc for more than 30 years. This is nothing new. It's just business as usual.

Elon and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad legal week

Get out much?

Consider, for a moment, the curious case of the Elephant in the room. It's not just any elephant but an Invisible one, conjured from the whispers of 'What If' and 'Just Suppose.' This elephant, unseen yet unmistakable, roams freely, feeding on the foliage of Fervent Belief without the tether of Evidence. Its presence as palpable as the air we breathe, yet as elusive as the wind—seen not with the eyes, but felt with the heart of Conviction.

Around it, a party is in full swing, with guests engaged in animated discussions. Amidst this gathering, the Invisible Elephant moves silently, its every step a testament to the power of imagination over observation. Some guests whisper of its menacing hazard, others of its majestic strength, though none can agree, for its form is shaped more by conviction than by reason.

Vietnam to collect biometrics - even DNA - for new ID cards

Imagine that ...

A single party, communist government seeking to incorporate and track as much personally identifiable information as possible. The mind boggles.

At least Western democratic governments treat privacy not as a nuisance, but as a sacrosanct principle.

NASA solar sail tech is ready – now who's up to use it in a mission?

Could be phrased clearer ...

Not that the NASA announcement is any clearer, but:The announcement comes after a quarter of the sail was unfurled, demonstrating that the deployment technology works as expected. would be better phrased as The announcement comes after a a successful ground test in which one quarter of the solar sail was successfully unfurled, demonstrating that the deployment technology works as expected.

It's true, LLMs are better than people – at creating convincing misinformation

This is a wetware problem, not LLM problem

My experience with LLMs shows they generate incredibly neurotypical pap. Why? Because they ingest a lot of it, then - by the Law of Large Numbers - they regurgitate the most neurotypical pap.

This is no different than experiments/research that generates "the most beautiful face". Average enough "beautiful" faces and you converge towards the one that appeals to the most people. Same with LLMs, average tons of neurotypical pap and your output will be that which converges to the pap most people like/accept.

Hubble telescope spots tiniest water-rich world in orbit

Skeptical

Sounds like a hoax perpetrated by a red dwarf - who, as know, really aren't, well, red.

Wait, hold on, everyone – Mozilla thinks Apple, Google, Microsoft should play fair

Re: Amazed that FF isn't used more

I am very sceptical about browser usage statistics and always have been.

Especially since browsers often lie to websites to get them to work.

Since Firefox automatically updates itself (might be platform dependent), couldn't Mozilla give an estimate of how many FF browsers get updated?

Of course, we then have the fact that multiple browsers are often installed on a machine.

GCHQ's NCSC warns of 'realistic possibility' AI will help state-backed malware evade detection

Hmm ...

The report by the GCHQ-run NCSC claimed. "There is a realistic possibility that highly capable states have repositories of malware that are large enough to effectively train an AI model for this purpose."

Shouldn't that rather read, "We have used our large repositories of malware to train an AI model for this purpose."?

Psst … wanna jailbreak ChatGPT? Thousands of malicious prompts for sale

"But, as with most legitimate tech, can also be used for evil. "

Which is why the common folk cannot be trusted with it.

Think of all the mayhem and chaos if common folk were permitted to access things (high tech and not) that could be used for nefarious purposes.

Researchers confirm what we already knew: Google results really are getting worse

All misdirection

The claim that the problem is SEO, or low quality content, or affiliate links pages is the root of what ails Google is absurdly false.

I had a website many moons ago (approaching 17 years) - long before search results become horrendously useless. Did it rank well, have lots of visitors? Of course not, how is a new, niche, web site supposed to compete against the millions out there at the time. However, when I signed up for Adsense (why not hope for a little passive income), I was very surprised to discover my visitors jumped 10x the first month and grew after that. It wasn't because of any viral page. Google decided that since I was running ads on my site, it was better for them to promote it.

Of course, Google has changed the was it ranks pages over the years and it seems to favour low-quality, affiliate-friendly site with lots of ads.

Search engines now behave more like the portals/services of yesteryear (AOL, Prodigy, etc) - trying to be your one stop interface to their vision o the Internet. I'm honestly surprised the the don't just open search content inside a frame (although, they are coming close with all their sidebars and stuff)

Mozilla CEO pockets a packet, asks biz to pick up pace the 'Mozilla way'

Is it any surprise?

A Robber-Baroness plundering all she can, while the hoi polloi suffer and struggle?

From Wikipedia (to be fair, her quote is unreferenced, so it, probably, needs a citation tag): In 2018 she received a total of $2,458,350 in compensation from Mozilla, which represents a 400% payrise since 2008.[15] On the same period, Firefox marketshare was down 85%. When asked about her salary she stated "I learned that my pay was about an 80% discount to market. ... That's too big a discount to ask people and their families to commit to."

NASA mistakenly severs communication to Voyager 2

Re: What's 2 degrees away from Earth?

Well, let's see ...

The distance from Earth is 20 light hours. This is the radius. The angle is 2°.

Using basic trigonometry: tan(2°) = (distance pointing away) ÷ (distance to Earth)

0.03492 = (distance pointing away) ÷ (20 light hours)

distance pointing away = 0.03492 * 20 light hours = 0.6981 light hours = 41.9 light minutes.

The sun is 8 light minutes from the Earth.

Depending on relative orbital position, the distance between Earth and Mars is anywhere from 5 to 20 light minutes.

Depending on relative orbital positions, the distance between Earth and Jupiter is anywhere from 35 to 52 light minutes.

So, to correct for a 2° aiming error, we would need to send a "reflector" somewhere out into Jupiter orbit zone in order to bounce off a signal between Earth and Voyager.

Smallsats + solar sails = Photos of exoplanets at 1970s digital camera resolution

There have been lots of directly imaged planets

Wikipedia has list of almost 3 dozen directly imaged extrasolar planets. (Or more than 2 dozen if you want to argue from the other direction)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_directly_imaged_exoplanets

Google says it did not train its AI chatbot Bard on your private emails

Re: "your"

The quote from Google is "We do not use personal data from your Gmail or other private apps and services to improve Bard."

I easily parse *personal data* to mean things like name, age, address, etc. I am more interested in knowing if they use the *content* from Gmail and other apps.

Linus Torvalds debuts 'boring old plain' Linux kernel 5.18

Re: Turing test

I'm leaning towards option (b).

Iran, China-linked gangs join Putin's disinformation war online

Thank heavens

We're not seeing Pro-Washington and United Kingdom miscreants using the war in Ukraine to spread disinformation that supports these countries' political interests — namely, advancing pro-Western narratives.

NASA's InSight probe emerges from Mars dust storm

Methinks the people working on fusion technology are also working on this technology ...

One of the challenges in exploring the moon or planets is dust kicked up by engines during landing or activity on these distant worlds. Scientists in the Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida are developing ways to mitigate this problem.

Electrodynamic dust shield, or EDS, technology is based on concepts originally developed by NASA as early as 1967 ...

https://web.archive.org/web/20130406081042/http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/home/mitigating_dust.html

A techy paper titled History and Flight Devleopment of the Electrodynamic Dust Shield is available here:

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150016082

If your preferred article style is more newsy than techy, the BBC reported (23 Aug 2010) that "Working with Nasa, Malay Mazumder from Boston University originally developed the technology to keep solar panels powering Mars rovers clean." and that "They expect the technology to be commercially available within one year."

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-11057771

Google's DeepMind says its AI coding bot is 'competitive' with humans

Bah! It's only "competitive"

I hear IBM's Watson was killing it in medical diagnoses.

Intel R&D spending surges after years of neglect as Gelsinger pledges to make Chipzilla great again

Good for Intel

I think this is the most interesting news to come out of Intel since Knights Corner.

Website fined by German court for leaking visitor's IP address via Google Fonts

This is quite chilling

Lot's of websites pull resources from other places - in fact, it's often encouraged. Want to display mathematical equations on your site: link to the - external - officially hosted version of MathJax - means you also get updates without having to manage it on your end. Want to use Bootstrap: link to the - external - officially hosted version. This is true for so many (most?) web frameworks, libraries, fonts, and other resources.

If every site has to maintain their own local copy of jQuery, what is their liability for not keeping it up to date? Because we've just been told they're liable for using external 3rd party resources (which silently roll out updates when needed - which is another thorny issue).

I am not trivializing privacy concerns. I prefer to be as untracked as possible, but every single connection on the Internet requires knowledge of the endpoint (yes, you can obscure it through a VPN or proxy, but you're not "anonymous" to them). You can't simply have a policy of not logging or tracking IP addresses, because that information is useful for blocking "hostile" actors (you know, the ones who keep trying to hack your site). On the other hand, it is really, really creepy if an actor - like Google - is taking access to a "public" resource and then trying to use it to build an identifiable profile.

Does the onus belong on a website using a 3rd party resource in good faith, or does it belong on the 3rd party providing a public resource in bad faith. Never mind all the thorny issues of what is appropriate due diligence on a website's part.

Security and privacy on the Internet are very difficult things.

duckduckgo will ask

Clicking on a YT video on the Videos tab, it presents me this message:

YouTube Privacy Warning

YouTube (owned by Google) does not let you watch videos anonymously. As such, watching YouTube videos here will be tracked by YouTube/Google.

Before offering me the "Watch Here" or "Watch on YouTube" buttons (unless you've been silly enough accept the "Remember my choice" option)

Boffins' first take on asteroid dust from Japanese probe: Carbon rich, less lumpy than expected

Re: No advance on 1953

>> How do you test something as vague as panspermia? The only proof would be to go somewhere else, quite far, and find life much too similar to Earth's to be a coincidence.

Or ... that would be evidence that the development of life must follow physical processes that result in life following a particular molecular trajectory.

Intel ‘regrets’ offending China with letter telling suppliers to avoid Xinjiang

The only honest comment

It's in the title

Google joins others in Big Tech: Get vaccinated – or you're fired

I used to believe that too

I think that was true 20 years ago when you found spirited, opinionated, and well trolled comments, but ... today - if the topic crosses a some perceived Left/Right divide - rationality goes out the window.

The "right-wing" nutters have always been around and engaging with them is like engaging with some homeless guy who's been off his psych meds too long and is coming down off a bender.

The "left-wing" nutters are a more recent phenomenon and engaging with them is like engaging with a tantrum throwing 3 year old who is screaming and thrashing about in the middle of a store aisle because you won't buy them "Fruity Unicorn Loopy Frosties"

India makes $10B bid to grow local semiconductor industry to serve – and challenge – the world

Good for them, I wish them success.

As for whether $10B is sufficient ...

> "India's subsidies may not buy it a lot. Samsung is spending $17 billion on a single fab in Texas"

While there is graft in all governments, I am fairly confident it takes fewer dollars to grease the machinery in India than the US and, so, that $10B may be more than sufficient.

Can Rust save the planet? Why, and why not

There are at least three reasons C vs C++ performance might differ

C and C++ are not the same language and there are a few corner cases were C code won't compile the same in C++, but ... I am digressing.

1) The programming paradigm is different between C and C++. In C++, you are "encouraged" to use C++ features - like the STL (Standard Template Library) instead of managing your data structures with malloc(), realloc(), and free(), or streams instead of printf() and FILE. So, equivalent C and C++ programs will look different.

2) C and C++ runtimes are different. C has no need for exception handling.

3) Even if you compiled a C program as a C++ program, things like structs get default constructors and destructors in C++.

You loved running JavaScript in your web browser. Now, get ready for Python scripting

Great! Another way to bloat and slow the browser.

Don't get me wrong, web browsers are pretty amazing - not to mention, extremely complex. What was once a thin client for remotely viewing and navigating documents has become a rather fat thin-client.

In fact. each passing iteration seems to be inching the browser closer and closer to being a full OS running as a guest on some target hardware (something Google anticipated back in 2009 with the release of ChromeOS).

AI-enhanced frog stem cells start to replicate in entirely new ways

To paraphrase Arthur Dent:

Ah, this is obviously some strange usage of the word 'replicate' that I wasn't previously aware of.

To be fair, the paper is talking about robotic assembly of other self-similar robots. The fact that these robots are assembled from cellular matter is irrelevant to the discussion - except that ... it's really cool (or creepy) to talk about previously living cells being shredded, assembled into a sort of Frankenstein monster, and then, themselves, assembling other Frankenstein monsters from similarly shredded cellular material.

For those who didn't read the paper, the steps are as follows:

1) Take a frog stem cell and remove the contents

2) Take the cell husk and strip off the outer layer

3) Assemble the cell inner layers into a "robot"

4) Put robots in an environment filled with the inner linings of cell and watch the robots "assemble" copies of themselves.

I see this less of a great leap in self-assembling robotics (although the shape is interesting) and more a testament to the tenacity of life to go on even after it's been horribly mutilated. This type of experiment shows that the forces binding life isn't just about the DNA, RNA, or macro-scale organisation - it is far deeper.

James Webb Space Telescope gets all shook up – launch delayed again

Isn't this One of Zeno's Paradoxes?

Something about never being able to attain a goal because no matter how close you get to it, there will always be a vanishingly smaller ways to go before achieving it.

Thousands of Firefox users accidentally commit login cookies on GitHub

Enough with the demands for Totalitarian control.

>> "I'm frustrated that GitHub isn't taking its users' security and privacy seriously," Marlin told The Register in an email.

GitHub isn't a mind reader. It doesn't know which uploaded data is private and which isn't. It trusts that the user correctly commits files to public and private repositories.

Every single file that is uploaded - publicly visible or not - is a potential security threat, data leak, or doxxing.

I can think of at least two legitimate reasons for uploading and making public facing a cookies.sqlite file:

1) controlled data to work with

2) a honeypot

Yes, some idiots might "accidentally" upload that file, but they might also "accidentally" upload their banking details as well or any other file that contains "sensitive" information.

He called himself the King of Fraud. Now this bot lord will reign in prison for years

Re: Seems kind of complicated

Agreed.

I assume he didn't want to have to share the ad revenue with the real ad slinging networks (like Google) that would have been actually needed to deliver the ads to real web pages. So, the cost of renting all those servers and IP addresses must have been cheaper than the cut Google et al would have taken.

Still as @Ace2 commented, he could have made more money being legit - maybe it would have taken longer, but, at least, he wouldn't be looking at prison.

As System76 starts work on its own Linux desktop world, GNOME guy opens blog, engages flame mode

Nothing to see here ...

... just routine internecine conflict.

NASA delays crewed Moon landing until 2025, citing technical infeasibility

Define "technical infeasibility"

because I'm pretty sure it isn't the same as "engineering infeasibility"?

Call me cynical, but I suspect "technical infeasibility" is simply code for "maximal pork-barreling infeasibility".