I can imagine this author writing about those "new-fangled automobiles" and how they would drive the horse-breeding industry out of business.
Posts by viscount
113 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jul 2014
Artificial intelligence is a liability
Too big to live, too loved to die: Big Tech's billion dollar curse of the free
If Google get really worried about the cost of running Gmail (and I not convinced that they will) then they can reduce the free storage limit and charge a subscription fee for those who use it regularly enough to build a large inbox.
Those upset by that change would take their email elsewhere, leaving a smaller user base of people split between a large number who hardly use it (and so have a nominal cost to serve) and a power user group who are paying anyway.
Before I agree to let your app track me everywhere, I want something 'special' in return (winks)…
Chocolate beer barred from sale after child mistakes it for chocolate milk
Workday shares slide following claims Amazon ditched company-wide HR system
What you need to know about Microsoft Windows 11: It will run Android apps
Salesforce to face trial after software used by Backpage 'to track sex traffickers, pimps, johns on social media'
Facebook finally finds something it thinks is truly objectionable and needs to be taken offline: Apple
British Airways fined £20m for Magecart hack that exposed 400k folks' credit card details to crooks
Hey is trying a new take on email – but maker complains of 'outrageous' demands after Apple rejects iOS app
Logic?
The key element for me is this quote from Apple.
"We are not going to talk about other apps."
Obviously you can use Office365 etc. on Apple and they do not make you buy it via them, whether consumer or corporate. So why lock out Hey like this? What distinction are they actually trying to make?
What do you call megabucks Microsoft? No really, it's not a joke. El Reg needs you
Browse mode: We're not goofing off on the Sidebar of Shame and online shopping sites, says UK's Ministry of Defence
Chrome deploys deep-linking tech in latest browser build despite privacy concerns
You're flowing it wrong: Bad network route between Microsoft, Apple blamed for Azure, O365 MFA outage
Cash carousel spun between Filetek and Autonomy, Lynch employee tells court
Google's reCAPTCHA favors – you guessed it – Google: Duh, only a bot would refuse to sign into the Chocolate Factory
Silent Merc, holy e-car... What is that terrible sound?
Eggheads want YOU to name Jupiter's five newly found moons ‒ and yeah, not so fast with Moony McMoonface
National Enquirer's big Pecker tried to shaft me – and I wouldn't give him an inch, says Jeff Bezos after dick pic leak threat
No more Windows build strings for you: BuildFeed has turned off the lights
Mark Zuckerberg did everything in his power to avoid Facebook becoming the next MySpace – but forgot one crucial detail…
Accenture in doghouse after NHSmail mass outage cuts off 1m+ UK health staff
SQLite creator crucified after code of conduct warns devs to love God, and not kill, commit adultery, steal, curse...
Silent running: Computer sounds are so '90s
GDPR stands for Google Doing Positively, Regardless. Webpage trackers down in Europe – except Big G's
Re: Google is headed for a Republican beatdown
You misunderstand the GOP mindset. The GOP is always in favour of _big_ business, regardless of domain and political view. So for example, conservatives rail against the Hollywood libs, but GOP administrations will always do everything they can to protect their IP at home and abroad.
This may seem contradictory. It is not as long as you understand the first principle of the GOP is to support big business. The actual business is of secondary importance. So expect Google to get a very easy ride indeed.
Plusnet customers peeped others' deets during system upgrade
Don't let Google dox me on Lumen Database, nameless man begs
Unpicking the Pixel puzzle: Why Google is struggling to impress
Revealed: El Reg blew lid off Meltdown CPU bug before Intel told US govt – and how bitter tech rivals teamed up
On Android, US antitrust can go where nervous EU fears to tread
Tim? Larry? We need to talk about smartphones and privacy
Ex-US pres Bill Clinton has written a cyber-attack pulp thriller. With James Patterson. Really
Pentagon in uproar: 'China's lasers' make US pilots shake in Djibouti
Press F to pay respects to the Windows 10 April Update casualties
Re: "Upgrading users should be able to ignore the viewer as before."
"Not you hit F1, and an almost random page opens in a browser with very little, if any, useful information."
This. I remember when MS help was awesome - full, clear and context sensitive in Excel for example. Now you get random links to websites that often don't exist anymore, along with lots of worse than useless "community content".
Android P will hear no evil, see no evil, support evil notches
Yorkshire cops have begun using on-the-spot fingerprint scanners
Laser sauce, cheat code, jam seshs: The Waymo vs Uber trial kicks off
Job ad for designer proves its point with MS Paint shocker
HMS Queen Elizabeth has sprung a leak and everyone's all a-tizzy
Netflix mulls using AI to craft personalized movie trailers for viewers
Google's phone woes: The Pixel and the damage done
Google Play Protect is 'dead last' at fingering malware on Android
OpenAI bot bursts into the ring, humiliates top Dota 2 pro gamer in 'scary' one-on-one bout
Browser trust test: Would you let Chrome block ads? Or Firefox share and encrypt files?
The vast majority of users do not currently use ad-blockers. So this is a smart move by Google. They are hoping to head of the growth of the blockers by stripping out the massively irritating ads but leaving the fairly innocuous ones. That is where Google started remember - small simple ads on search results.
It may or may not work, but its an interesting move to try it, especially for mobile.