First they came...
First they came for the live translate
And I did not speak out
Because I do not use live translate
36 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jul 2014
I have a visual disability, and love Uber because I dont have to faff with credit cards or cash in the back of a dark taxi. But I have lost count of the number of times I have had to text an Uber driver and say "hey I probably wont be able to see approach, so look for the dude with the short white stick and that will be me". I would love and option where I can tell Uber I am disabled and the driver would know and it would make pickups a hell of a lot easier.
Okay I am going to get downvoted for this but someone has to say it.
While I dont doubt that the event with the phone happened. I am not convinced the "cute little door" words were used. And even it it was (let's assume positive intent here), I don't think it needs to be added to this story to make the story any better.
Why?
Because it turns this delightful story of user incompetence into something which smells a little sexist.
Now you may say I am being over sensitive, or you may even accuse me of some kind of projection, but I just dont feel the way in which this story was told is appropriate, especially with all the efforts of trying to get more women into technology.
Go ahead now, downvote me...
I fail to see how this is even a story?
Before I explain, let me say first. All hate, of race, religion, colour or creed is wrong wrong wrong!
But this story isn't really about this.
Facebook allows you to put any free text in your job title. Some idiots put Jew Hater in there. Okay, so maybe we can blame facebook for not banning people from entering that term. But its a strange arms race to police free text fields. We may soon get outraged stories about a Speech Therapist who was banned form facebook because the job title contained the word "rapist".
The second thing that happened was that you can create an ad that targets people with a certain job title. So they put in the word Jew Hater as a job title and got some hits. Okay. The story is maybe that some idiotic haters publish their hate on facebook under the entry Job Title.
Or is the story that facebook should have had better mechanisms in place to filter out people trying to target ads that contain blacklisted words? Yes they probably should. And when they find out about it they try to fix it.
But turning this into a racism story is absurd. How's about we do an outraged article about facebook allowing us to advertise DIY brewing kits to people who have identified themselves as "recovering alcoholics", because I bet that would be possible too.
Wow, sorry for the delayed response! Havent been on here for a while.
So I run Windows 7. Windows High Contrast is pretty useless because web pages dont respect it. So what I have found though that you can defeat pastels by running your screen in inverse colour mode!
So I run Windows Magnifier, set the zoom to 100% (no zoom), set it to full screen, and set colour inverse to true. I pin it to my taskbar and then click on it when I need to switch colours to see if any given UI works better in its inverse colour mode. So far it has been reasonably useful.
I am in the process of going blind, so I feel qualified to answer at least part of the question.
There are two trends in web design that is making my life very hard.
1. The pastel and low contrast movement. People are moving away from high contrast in web and other UI design and using muted colours with very little contrast. Flat UIs are particularly guilty here. Often Buttons, or other actionable parts like links etc, are not obviously high contrast like they used to be, but looks like all other text on the screen. (Sometimes the lines surrounding button is so thin and low contrast compared to the rest of the colour scheme that I just cannot see it)
2. Flat controls - buttons dont have hard shaded areas, and are sometimes just thin lines surrounding some text. So, very subtle, and the screen looks more like something printed on paper, than an obvious computer UI. Again, for someone with low vision like me, it is sometimes impossible, without moving my mouse over every part of the screen until the pointer changes to know if I have hit a UI control.
Not sure this helps answering your question, but I least I got to rant a little. :)
Okay I admit I googled it briefly AND i just took what Google told me, but according to EU regs (and I think UK is still in the EU) there are regulations for the roosting space and state, and then also:
"...
In addition to these requirements, free-range systems must also provide the following:
One hectare of outdoor range for every 2,500 hens (equivalent to 4 m2 per hen; at least 2.5 m2 per hen must be available at any one time if rotation of the outdoor range is practiced)
Continuous access during the day to this open-air range, which must be “mainly covered with vegetation”
Several popholes extending along the entire length of the building, providing at least 2 m of opening for every 1,000 hens.[6]
..."
Yeah I am not sure I get this logic. There is a law in place to stop people using phones while driving because it causes more accidents. Just like there is a law in place that says you cannot be under the influence of alcohol or drugs while driving because it too causes more accidents.
They have a blood/breath test to see if you were breaking the drink/drug law. Now they are proposing a phone test to see if you were breaking the phone law. Simple.
Some windows on some skyscrapers have this central pivot you talk of. However above a certain altitude, the relative air pressures and wind blowing high vs no wind at the bottom would cause a rush of air out the window if you open it. (Imagine papers etc flying out!)
Another factor is having someone flip open the window inside some exec's office to clean it may be a tad disruptive...
Okay firstly I am an ex smoker. Smoked for 17 years, and quit when my wife became pregant with first child about 6 years ago. Wasnt easy. And I still miss it. Daily.
However I would wholeheartedly support airlines allowing smokers to vape on flights. I well remember how crap it felt to fly long haul and not being able to smoke. Will probably reduce the amount of air rage we see [citation needed].
However I dont buy the "it stinks" argument. The guy sitting next to me letting off beer farts it infinitely less preferable a smell as someone vaping next to me. And I dont see the airlines doing anything about that!
Oh I'd say the downvote had nothing to do with gun control. It was probably due to the fact that the comment was badly formed XML.
Here, have a:
</Rant alert and in no way do I count the whole of the US populace in this, but excuse me while I rail against>
;)
"TV programmes can be transmitted many months after the material is filmed. And being "very drunk" is occasionally how pregnancies start."
You are almost certainly right. However I could not resist the Daily Mail style outrage opportunity this gave me...
(Plus I would be genuinely sad if you are wrong)
I live in Switzerland and I have had 3 of these in English!! On the last call, I asked the guy if this is the job he always dreamed of. If, when he wakes up in the morning, does he feel that he has achieved all he wanted in life, and if not, I work for a large company who employ many many people in India and doesn't he want a real job? Almost got him to send me his CV, and once one of them does, maybe we can get El Reg to post the (probably fake) CV of a scammer... :)
Anyone else up for the challenge?