Re: I'm curious..
"Do you want anything to drink with that?"
No, ma'am
1347 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Jun 2014
Still worlds apart. You can *completely* opt out of data collection in Ubuntu. The information collected is easily readable by a human. You cannot opt out of data collection in Windows and the information collected is not easily human readable - the screenshots of the data viewer look like something only a programmer could decipher. Hardly understandable by Grandma.
Worlds apart on what data is collected too. Ubuntu would collect this:
*Ubuntu Flavour
* Ubuntu Version
* Network connectivity or not
* CPU family
* RAM
* Disk(s) size
* Screen(s) resolution
* GPU vendor and model
* OEM Manufacturer
* Location (based on the location selection made by the user at install). No IP information would be gathered
* Installation duration (time taken)
* Auto login enabled or not
* Disk layout selected
* Third party software selected or not
* Download updates during install or not
* LivePatch enabled or not
* Popcon would be installed. This will allow us to spot trends in package
usage and help us to focus on the packages which are of most value to our users.
* Apport would be configured to automatically send anonymous crash reports without user interruption.
The list of stuff Windows collects exceeds the word limit on Reg comment posts.
And if the Financial Times is behind their own paywall, I pay them and not you. If I value their content enough to pay for it ahead of time.
Or is SatoshiPay supposed to be some sort of alternate universal paywall for sites that charge for access? If so, the same problem exists for you as for every site behind a paywall - they are too much bother.
What's in a name? Absolutely nothing.
Unfortunately, there is nothing (of value) in SatoshiPay, just like there was nothing of value in flooz and beenz - you have no unique selling point, you solve no problem, therefore, the inconvenience you add to a simple financial transaction gives me nothing so I am unlikely to even consider your service. Your oft repeated example of buying one article instead of the book is a non-solution to a non-problem as I can simply go to the Register and print the article a lot more easily and with less expense than the jumpitty-hoopity nonsense I'd have to go through to use your payment service.. Having all the Geek Guide to Britain articles gathered together into a book which may be paid for easily using existing payment methods is something of value as it is more convenient than collecting the whole series myself.
Register this as the user (NSFW)
https://www.amazon.com/Loftus-International-Inflatable-Judy-Doll/dp/B001BXZTDS?psc=1&SubscriptionId=AKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q&tag=duckduckgo-vivaldi-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B001BXZTDS
"how do you feel about Barrack Obama doing exactly the same Facebook mining in 2012 during his reelection campaign, and bragging about it too?"
Because the Obama campaign did not do *exactly* the same thing. A couple of excerpts from an article on politifact.com:
"The Obama campaign created a Facebook app for supporters to donate, learn of voting requirements, and find nearby houses to canvass. The app asked users’ permission to scan their photos, friends lists, and news feeds. Most users complied.
The people signing up knew the data they were handing over would be used to support a political campaign. Their friends, however, did not.
The people who downloaded the app used by Cambridge Analytica did not know their data would be used to aid any political campaigns. The app was billed as a personality quiz that would be used by Cambridge University researchers."
"Obama operatives used Facebook data to get users to send their messaging for them, according to Eitan Hersh, a Tufts professor who wrote Hacking the Electorate, a book on Obama’s microtargeting strategies.
Facebook friends lists, tags and photos allowed Obama operatives to identify a person’s close friends, which they then matched with offline public records. (Was this person likely to vote for Obama, but unlikely to get out to vote?) They then told the app users which of their friends they should send campaign messages to.
Cambridge Analytica dialed up what Karpf called the creepiness factor. They combined the survey results with the Facebook data to create psychological profiles they then sold to campaigns. The idea was, if the firm could discover how these people thought, they could target ads toward them.
Cambridge Analytica then sent targeted ads to the users on their database as well as users with similar profiles, identified by Facebook’s Lookalike tool. The friends of the app users weren’t being targeted by their friends, but by the campaign itself. In other words, the consenting middle man was gone.
In his research, Hersh found that neither tactic was greatly effective at persuading people to vote."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/mar/22/meghan-mccain/comparing-facebook-data-use-obama-cambridge-analyt/