next tech
The new in development tech in IT how photonics, new NVM, ect... to arrive next, (max 5 years) to bring elect. consumptions very slow, for this I dont believe what never in Exa scale era to overcome too much megawatts
199 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jun 2014
The outcome of the litigation is not due to that the API´s are many or few, or that are hard or easy to make, is that they are property of the first that made them and therefore retains all rights, company Larry Ellison made a very significant investment in Java is just to get benefits
HPE has big plans for the future, if their bets tech are a success, it will be the first company IT in the world, by year 2020, this time without going of acquisitions, but the devil is in the details and the plans may fail especially if the competition is ahead their forecasts in the release of products that are being developed in HPE labs.
Original
HPE tiene grandes planes de futuro, si sus apuestas tech son un éxito, volverá a ser la primera empresa IT del mundo, para año 2020, esta vez sin ir de adquisiciones, pero el demonio esta en los detalles y los planes pueden fallar sobre todo si la competencia se adelanta a sus previsiones en el lanzamiento de productos que se están desarrollando en HPE labs.
The main concern of Dell acquisition, is not the overlapping of products, neither if VMware will lose market, not even the integration; but the great debt that acquires that it will suppose a payment of 2.5 billions $ a year, will need more than 25 years to cancel it, this ballasted R&D, the recruiting, the purchase of companies and other investments; HP didn't buy EMC in a wise decision that leaves it free the hands to define the future that wants, Meg Whitman of HP will make purchases with more sense.
The main concern of Dell acquisition, is not the overlapping of products, neither if VMware will lose market, not even the integration; but the great debt that acquires that it will suppose a payment of 2.5 billions $ a year, will need more than 25 years to cancel it, this ballasted R&D, the recruiting, the purchase of companies and other investments; HP didn't buy EMC in a wise decision that leaves it free the hands to define and not to mortgage the future that wants, Meg Whitman of HP will make purchases with more sense. Well Meg!!!
The words key in the selection of a new CEO are 1º: to lead the eternal values of HP 2º: the capacity of execution of a guessed right vision, to this is to add 3º: "charisma", but with the capacity to be connected strongly with the daily reality of the world, the business and people (to listen a lot)
Meg Whitman the "terminator" of HP, it has removed the bread to family parents' thousands, exactly 55.000 drops, more than the deads in the battle of gettysburg of the American civil war, it is a shame, it is a clamor that ascends to the sky for this great nonsense, the buyer IT it should consider all these things and to avoid any economic relationship with this company.
Meg Whitman the "terminator" of HP, it has removed the bread to family parents' thousands, exactly 55.000 drops, more than the deads in the battle of gettysburg of the American civil war, it is a shame, it is a clamor that ascends to the sky for this great nonsense, the buyer IT it should consider all these things and to avoid any economic relationship with this company.
HP always it has been a hypocritical company, "HPway" shakes but it leaves without work to thousands family parents, HP is a greedy company that the only thing that looks for is easy enrichment everything the rest it is pure fantasy, HPlabs, the jewel of the crown of HP they are not what seems, memristor it has been the fiasco of the century, Intel working with modesty, has achieved it with its memory "3D xpoint". HP should disappear for the mediocre thing that they are its mangement and its products.
It has been written in this blog, IBM is dismantling its hardware division that it produce scarce benefits, this is logical, the companies move for the big margins of benefit and at the moment its division of mainframes is a clear example of cleaned up business and for that reason maintains and promotes it (its growth is of 13%, year on year average.)
This is the comment more voted to favor, but people have very bad memory, the purchase of companies on the part of HP most of times they have been a success, for example the controversial purchase of Compaq rises to HP in what is today, the first servers supplier, Window and Linux of the world, the purchase of 3PAR in the company of more growth in storage. It seems that in this forum this subsidized by the disloyal competition of Hewlett Packard
Really? Compaq gave HP the scepter of managerial servers, 3com and Huawei to transform in the second player in switches and routers, 3PAR in an unquestionable leader in storage, Autonomy contribute with incredible software tech ,Mercury idem etc... etc without offending but people don't know what says
I believe that it is hypocritical to make stand out those 30.000 discharged workers, the big companies in some moment of their history made the same thing, it is necessary to read the book "Tough Choices" of C Fiorina to understand her in depth, there are important people in USA that fears that Carly arrives to the presidency, same people without scruples that looks for to get rich at the expense to the taxpayer's and that they don't want to lose their privileged situation
The times of it keels in the address of HP they have happened, new horizons open up for this American great company, according to CEO Meg Whitman "When I look at the way the business is performing, the pipeline of innovation and the daily feedback that I receive from our customers and partners, my confidence in the turnaround grows stronger."
In the year 1996 the memristor development began, in 2008 its existence was demostrated, the transistor was discovered in 1948 for Bell labs, in 1957 General Electric it manufacture the first computer using transistors. The memristor roadmap seems slow but it makes certain common sense that in 2016 it offers commercially,but it is necessary to advance launching dates.
If designs IBM were superior For that don't accept them the industry? simply because they were not it, IBM is not well accepted and its best times already passed, the captive market that has (monopoly "per se") with towering prices of the products, differentiates it of the competition.
I find unhappy the permission given by US regulator that will give as result troubles, difficulties and intrigues in the future, has been allowed that the "vixen" enters in the "henhouse" of the business server IT, harming the domestic makers X86 gravely, that they will have even less margins of economic benefit, asphysiation the business, good play of IBM that eliminated competition, although to cost of the American business.