"This has nothing to do with the Matrix protocol; it's just an unfortunate naming coincidence."
Not so much coincidence as lack of originality.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"hardware requirements and watch win 11 take off"
That wouldn't achieve Microsoft's aims. What you're supposed to do is replace it with a shiny, new PC which comes with a shiny new W11 licence for which you'll have given them money. The only reason for the free upgrades on newer stuff would have been to avoid any class actions along the lies of "I just bought a new machine and Microsoft have made it obsolete" and maybe to get a few examples in front of the public.
So either
(a) he targetted a Russian interest, possibly in Russia or one owned by some friendly oligarch outside it;
(b) he hasn't paid big enough bribes to law enforcement or
(c) once imprisoned (the minor formality of a trial can be taken as read) he can be released under the scheme for prisoners to be released to join the army although in this case he'll be deployed to something suited to his talents rather than sent to the front.
"If 2+ apps or applets have non-overlapping functionality then it would be preferable to combine them into one."
It may well be that these reflect different ideas users may have about how to do things. For instance I never used the Commander-style TUI file managers on MSDOS so have no interest in having that sort of thing ported to the GUI world. Others do and want one. Hence we have Dolphin, which I use and Krusader which I don't even have installed. It doesn't bother me in the least that there's an alternative file manager but it's very likely that some users or potential users might see its absence as an issue.
Likewise I have no problem in there being two ways to display the start menu that I don't use (in fact, I've just noticed that "Show alternatives..." doesn't find them for some reason) but I'd be very unhappy if my preference wasn't there and I have no doubt users of the others would feel the same about theirs going missing. It's considerably better than getting presented with a different version with each new version of Windows on a take it or take it version and having to find some third party product to fix it.
I suppose that, to put it into trendy jargon, I can kurate curate my own experience.
"Starting from the 16:9 aspect ratio we seem stuck with."
You can have any aspect ratio you want, just mask off whatever bits of the 16:9 hardware you don't want. Why 16:9 in hardware? That's easy. It's the TV format so display makers are going to have to produce displays in that format. For laptop makers it also folds nicely over a keyboard with a numeric keypad*. If you want them to produce a second (second, that's the key word) format you're going to have to persuade them to make all the necessary investments and that will put up the price even if you can find a sufficient market that agrees on any given alternative - 4:3 landscape? portrait?
* In the past I've had laptops with 4:3 aspect ratio but they didn't have a numeric keypad. Sure you could build one with 4:3 and a numeric keypad but you'd then have blank space beside the screen. It would look silly and everyone would wonder why they couldn't just make the screen wider.
What was the last Linux you used and when? Or have you just read things written about Linux by other people who've read things written about Linux by other people who...
For reference I have an Asus laptop which came with W10 on it and is now dual boot with Linux. The Linux part Just Works. The W10 Just Doesn't Really Work; it hasn't succeeded in a clean update for about a year. Even before that debacle there was a display update -as far as the can be told from the number the same updae - that installed itself every month. When it boots up it's extremely sluggish, partly because its trying and failing to update but I can hear the disk chiuntering away doing something which I presume is what's eating up the entire throughput of the beast.
I have another, even more ancient MSI net-top era device dual boot with W7. That, of course has now stopped updating so that as much as can be done with W7 Home (bugger all) plus an Office 97 found in a cupboard somewhere can be done with it. That also is dual boot and comes with all the goodies you - or rather I - would expect to find an a good Linux distro. W10, of course, wanted to sell me a whole lot of stuf to do something useful. When it was in support, of course, updates took and age and many reboots, as does W10 when it's not falling over.
BTW, Boring is good. It's the eye-rattling look-at-me GUI stuff which is a pain in the arse. And on the occasions that I drop down to the CLI it's do do stuff that you probably wouldn't know enough to even dream about.
Linux doesn't have this mammoth monthly update-fest. If you saw a typical Linux update happening you'd probably thing it had failed because of the speed and the absence of reboots; even a new kernel just sits there until you reboot in the normal course of events while update services are just restarted on the fly.
So to re-write your contention, Linux desktop experience doesn't even match Windows 7 (let alone 10!) THANK GOODNESS.
"opening up the network settings dialog the pane with the actual network settings in is always cut off to some degree and when you expand the window, instead of making that pane bigger, the window pops in a side bar"
I don't see that at all. If I left click the Wifi connection icon in the system tray I get a view of the visible access points and a few buttons to disable it altogether or switch airplaine mode (I don't have a wired connection) I also have an option to configure network connections which is also available, along with airplane mode, by right-clicking.
Either configuration option brings up KSettings>Network>Connections>Wi-Fi>current access point with the pane for the access point showing the name and below it General configuration Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Security, IPv4 and Ipv6 tabs showing, the second bing selected. Nothing seems to be cut off.
The alternative KSettings>Network>Settings has a secondary menu for Proxy, Connection prefereces, SSL Preferences, Cookies and Windows Shares, each bringing up various panes which don't seem to be cut off. This is KSetings 5.27.5 on Devuan The network-manager package is installed but none of the other module packages are. I wonder if you've got something else installed that's conflicting because what you describe just doesn't sound like KDE at all.
In general I agree but I've been having second thoughts about hamburger menus. It depends on aspect ratio. A hamburger menu works well, for instance, on a smartphone held, as it usually is, in portrait format where a CUA-inspired* menu would be useless. I'm pretty sure there are situations were a side-bar would be greatly improved by replacing whatever it uses for options with a hamburger menu.
So I have a radical suggestion: implement the menu structure - text and actions - as a separate entity and provide a number of display options and - the really radical bit - let the user choose. It could be CUA-style, hamburger, ribbon, single line of text as in UCSD Pascal or whatever. To some extent Firefox does this in that you can turn the CUA-style menu on although you can't, as far as I've been able to discover, turn the hamburger off.
* Pace Liam, I know they don't conform in sufficient detail for your liking but in absence of anything better it's a useful handle.
Digging a little deeper into that list in TFA, one each of the text editors, file managers and browsers are intended to be cross-platform for mobile and desktop/laptop devices. In practice I think that could read as being intended for mobile but you can use it elsewhere if you want consistency, where "elsewhere" includes Windows and Mac as well as FOSS. I think approach that fits your "small side-trek".
Of the remaining two browsers and three file managers one program, the venerable Konqueror is both. It dates from the days before there were separate applications*. This isn't Google so it hasn't been killed off and presumably there are a few users who like an all-in-one application. It definitely fits your small side-trek leaving Falkon as the main browser although Debian and Devuan don't include it.
That leaves two file managers, Dolphin and Kommander. Dolphin is what you might consider as the equivalent of the Windows file manager in the sense that i understand Windows to have finally caught up with Dolphin although the former still looks like a confused mess in the UI department. As to Kommander, the klue clue is in the name. There are users who simply want a clone of the original (was it Norton?) Commander. A quick DDG tells me there's still a cottage industry in developing those for Windows - there are even listicles of the things. So that's a side-trek for that particular audience - I don't grok it myself but it's a phenomenon to be recognised.
Where does that leave us? Ah, yes, the two text editors, KWrite and Kate. AIUI KWrite was the original simple text editor and KA(advanced)T(ext)E(ditor) was the development with all the bells and whistles. Fire them up and the only obvious difference, if you look for it, is that Kate has a tab. I believe Kate also has a lot of other stuff such as plug-ins although they're built on the same editing engine. I agree, I don't see the point in having two. That sort of thing would never happen in the Windows world, would it, with a basic Notepad and somebody producing a Notepad++ with all the bells and whistles?
What I miss is an integrated PIM that includes a Usenet client like Thunderbird does. It just goes to show you can't have everything.
* Strictly speaking it replaced a file-manager.
Back when W10 first cam out and there were all the rows about telemetry and the humongous privacy statement or whatever it was I read through that. It was interest for what it didn't say. It gave instances of what it might record but didn't say they were the only things. It included something about transactions; many people reading that would have thought "that's reasonable, if I have transactions with Microsoft they'll need to know about them." but there was no such limitation so if Microsoft wanted to snaffle transactions with your bank that was covered. IOW it didn't say your data could be shared with the world, it just failed to say it couldn't.
Make sure cost are charged to departments. If marketing, for example, wants to use AI which runs up a big power bill ensure it comes out of marketing's budget. If that then have less to splurge on ads or events, tough - they should have thought about that first. If they then have to explain the cost-benefits of the expenditure, so much the better.
"Yes, like software should only be designed and written by people with CITP or similar qualification and documented continuing professional development."
Given that the entire S/W profession is younger than I am I can see the obvious flaw with this. Who had a similar qualification to set up and assess the original training and qualification scheme?
I think it was in the course of organising a replacement for the damaged die that my colleague was on the phone to the states - a rare thing in those days - talking to what he took to be a very small company producing such a specialized piece of laboratory kit. Given that USians aren't renowned for appreciating irony let alone Belfast humour making a joke about supposing he worked for de Beers in his other job wasn't a good idea.