Re: A New Year's gift from Microsoft: Surprise, your scanners don't work
And telemetry so we don't really need to test - the AI can find out what's going wrong when you run it.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"they still can't be arsed to make it consumer friendly"
Who's "they"? And in what way is it not consumer friendly?
Your answer to the first would be quite significant because "Linux" as a generic concept ranges from servers to desktops (and on to numerous consumer devices including Android devices and all sorts of stuff where it's embedded and not really visible in any typical computery way).
From my own PoV I use Linux because I want to do actual stuff - mostly, these days, historical research - and don't want something that gets in the way. I want browsers, an email & newsgroup client, office suite, graphics SW etc. that Just Works. I really haven't time to faff about with stuff that doesn't. Devuan/KDE provides all that, all through GUI applications. SWMBO also uses Devuan/KDE. A cousin-in-law uses Zorin. It all Just Works. I call BS on your contention.
By comparison I have an old laptop that came with W10. For a long time it ran as my daily driver once I'd blown away Windows & installed Linux (Debian back then). When I replaced it as a daily driver I reinstalled W10 from its backup and made it dual boot. AFAICS W10 is useless. If I turn it on now it spends all its time failing to update and chewing up pretty well all its throughput doing it.
Zorin is what I put on my CiL's computer years ago when her W7 got hit by ransomware.* I can't say it really resembles what I recall of W7 to any great extent but it was easy enough for her to use. Useful reminder - I promised I'd go over this month to update it to latest version.
* Beginners! write out encrypted version without overwriting original. Everything sitting there, waiting to be discovered with PhotoRec
"You'd have MAGA conspiracy theorists out the ass screaming about how this is a complete hoax because Jesus was born in the year zero"
Unsurprisingly this makes them numerically ill-informed. The AD/BC dating was devised by a monk called Dionysius Exiguus (Dennis is the English form of the name) who only had Roman numerals to work with and they have no zero nor any concept of zero.
I admit to having been tripped up with this one when writing the program to calculate the dates from 14C dating data. Dates are calculated BP (Before Present) where Present is taken as 1950* when Libby introduced the technique. The standard is a bit arbitrary because for the last century or so increasing amounts of fossil carbon had been added to the atmosphere making it appear older and more recently nuclear weapons testing had added 14C making it younger again. But I digress - having calculated the BP date I then added the AD/BC calculation by simply subtracting 1950.
As we reported dates rounded to to 5 years it didn't really make a noticeable difference. Until I got an Iron Age date that yielded 1950 BP.
* I've been out of that world for a long time now so I've no idea whether they still do that.
"Chances are good that, were we to dig into the postmortem of all those little issues we'd find a lot of IT admins with eggs on their faces for not responding to the need to patch things."
Not the IT admins. My problem was the client's bean-counters who had run UAT successfully on their new Y2K system (the old one wasn't) insisting that they couldn't cut over until they'd finished their year-end routine. We were going to cut over between Xmas & new year; they insisted on mid-January. Nutters.
It's not a legal thing, it's an easy life thing. You pay us a fine without admitting guilt, we make your problem go away by not doing the work needed to bring it to court. What I would like to know is whether there are financial rewards over and above salary, possibly not directly attributable e.g. by having met overall annual argets, for those offering such a deal.
"The Register asked Microsoft ... whether it would consider changing the hardware requirements of Windows 11"
Why would they? There's nothing in it for them. The free upgrade is likely to stave off class actions from people who'd just bought W10 boxes. All the rest are expected to buy new kit and with it new licences or, failing that, extended support. Those are revenue streams. Free upgrades for those who they don't have to upgrade aren't. About the only possibility - if it happens you read it here first - would be a paid-for "special" W11 version with the H/W requirements removed.
"Four in ten of the servers currently residing in datacenters across the globe are at least six years old. Meanwhile, not only does this 40 percent slice consume 66 percent of the energy used by all bit barns – they also only provide 7 percent of the world's total compute."
They always think we can't see what they're up to. In this case we're supposed to think that 66% of DCs' energy is producing 7% of the DCs'output. But the world's computing power is not all in DCs so it's a false comparison.
As a matter of interest hat %age of the world's and DCs' computing power and DC energy is mining cryptocurrency and training LLMs?
I started to run into trouble with the first example in the linked article: "this suggests that the thinker can access about 2^20 ≈ 1 million possible items in the few seconds allotted" Huh???? What's the logic behind this? Ah, I see. It makes a lot of assumptions about how the "thing" is selected and also about the actual number of bits communicated in a yes/no question.
Very likely the thinker can only access a relatively few items when asked cold and most of the time will be spent in doing a lot of processing about what will be an answer which will be hard to guess and maybe also constrain the answer to be within the shared experience of thinker and guesser* Treating that as simple random access is going to seriously misrepresent what's actually happening.
Also, even if the questions are posed as yes/no it's not necessarily easy to answer as yes or no. If, for instance the question is "Is it red?" it will be a good deal easier to answer if "it" is el Reg's banner rather than a terracotta pantile, somewhere between orange and red. Whatever the answer, the hesitation, intonation and facial expression of the answerer will convey more than one bit of information.
What else? Typing speeds? How many bits are actually needed to select a letter? A good deal more than they seem to think givern the number of muscles that need to be controlled with considerable recision. In fact most.if not all the tasks they measure are input or output tasks and depend on the rate at which things happen in the external world. There's a limit as to how fast the fingers can move in typing, how fast a pen might move to produce legible writing. Speech recognition needs a lot of processing to turn sounds into meaning and, of course there's a limit on how fast they can be spoken with fast speech putting an extra burden on the listener to sort out the badly articulated sound.
What may well be beyond measurement is the purely internal processing when problem solving. How many bits per second are involved in running through a lot of complicated ideas? How many bits is an idea?
* If that isn't done the guesser will routinely not win. Zheng and Meister may be biologists but, as another biologist I would have no problem thinking about biological objects outside their experience - and, of course, vice versa
Arrive on doorstep, ring bell, hand over two packages and drive off before I open the packages to discover that there must have been a third. Clearly Amazon still don't know that software should be designed to look for and handle things not being done right. It would be perfectly straightforward to alert the driver if he fails to scan out all and only the correct packages at a delivery point. I suppose it's always something to be done in the next sprint.
"Do they really think the 9 Telcos that were breached are not currently spending billions and employ some of the best cybersecurity talent money can buy?"
Forget what they think and look instead on what they - and we - know. that in spite of all the spending and employment the telcos were required to provide back doors for the good guys to monitor communications based on the magical thinking that the bad guts would be unable to find and use them.
"One thing every org needs to start to plan for: SaaS provider breaches. What's your playbook for when your SaaS provider gets breached?..."
And when do you need to start to plan?
Before you sign up for the service!!!!
When do you finish planning?
Never.
And, of course, you not only plan, you act on your plans.
"Those and a deal too good to be true."
This is the basis for a con, always has been, always will be, whatever the technology - or its absence. The sad sact is that however many warnings yu issue there'll always be somebody whose reaction will be to see the "deal" part, not the "too good to be true".
"And this is why Crystal Morin, former intelligence analyst for the US Air Force and cybersecurity strategist at Sysdig, anticipates seeing highly successful supply chain attacks in 2025 that originated with an LLM-generated spear phish"
Is it too cynical to ask what, having achieved a big scary headline, Morin and Sysdig are flogging?
I've seen a walking group, with their waterproof map pouches round their necks, heading towards a foot-path which. had they turned the corner would have been clearly visible as well as being marked on the maps, turn round back the way they'd come and take the road up to some cottages, clearly marked as private. If you have a map, learn to read it.