Re: Hmm
At one time I had a square X terminal. That was OK but only a mega-pixel. These days I'd want more pixels. And bigger, my eyes not being as young as they were.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Different use cases.
These days I spend a good deal of time dealing with maps but also a little working on panoramas. Currently working on a book - in fact I should be doing that rather than being here - where I'm planning on splitting maps with a wide E/W spread or panoramas across the double spread. Width is what counts for that.
Apart from the material being edited most graphics applications have palettes, toolbars & whatnot to the sides* so again, width is important although with a tall screen it would simply be a matter of re-jigging the layout.
I also find it useful to have the document being written and source material side-by-side and again a wide screen is best there; vertical stacking would be OK but probably suboptimal.
* Back in the day that also applied to a lot of IDEs I used.
"According to some estimates, about 16 percent of UK consumers fell victim to phone scams back in 2023"
And is that surprising? Following the online crumb trail to report a scam call leads to a page which gives advice about bot being scammed with an otpion to report that you have been scammed. There is no option to report what might well be new scams to let them chase up scammers.
Then there are alternatives for reporting nuisance calls, calls to TPS-registered lines and marketing calls. The latter, rather like advertising standards, seems to be run by the weasel marketing industry who, AIUI, allow themselves to overlook TPS if they're conducting "surveys". There needs to be a single reporting channel, run by OFCOM with action taken. Either that or my oft-mentioned idea of transfer charging nuisance callers of all stripes to pay the callees.
"Training large LLM's requires so much data that I believe it will be impossible to adhere to all of the licensing of the materials that have been used for training"
Let's make a similar argument about money:
"I want so much money that it's impossible for me to get enough without adhering to the laws about theft."
Is that OK?
And let's address the bit about writing books. If you read and understand several advanced text books you might very usefully write a book aimed at explaining the subject to an audience that needs an easier to understand or shorter version. But that book needs to come from your understanding. Understanding is very different from being able to produce a word salad derived from the books.
As Tom says above, an RPi400 or the like would be suitable for most situations an might well fit the lower income home family budget but PC box-shifters* aren't going to demean themselves. It wouldn't give them the margins. It will probably take them (and Microsoft) a good while to realise that their market is now saturated.
* Yes, I know they like to dignify themselves as The Channel nowadays but that what they always were.
Growth always looks exponential and it never is. Whatever space something is growing into is finite. Whatever resources are needed is finite. In the early stages these are not limiting factors so growth looks exponential but it's really the start of sigmoidal growth which flattens out when those factors do become limiting. Any ecologist can tell you that and I'd hope an economist would as well.
What's more, for a longish lived product that applies to the total number of units sold. Monthly/annual sales are just the first differential of that.
TL:DR You're lucky to have replacement sales.
Ah, Kermit. Used that on a luggable as my regular terminal for what seems like years but probably wasn't. It did get me used to working with small TE windows for years. Nowadays they need to be a bit bigger but at the time several xterms open at once or several of some other TE working in Windows.
I'd also like to see the regulators' costs taken out of the fines with only the residue handed on to the Treasury. Even better, add the costs onto the fine. Also there should be no option to pre-empt matters by paying a fine without admitting guilt. The regulator decides a breach has taken place and then issues a fine. That decision can then be used as evidence in civil claims.
Plans, pledges, budget explanations - no plan survives first contact with reality. Macmillan's comment needs to be remembered by any politician in opposition and any voter reading their manifestos: "Events, dear boy, events".
What you really need to know is how they'll approach the first unexpected event and until you've seen them do that you won't know.
One thing that does matter to those with ageing eyes or those with eye problems at a younger age is screen size. It's not an aspect of the sort of work being done, it's an aspect of being able to use the thing at all. As the biggest is 16" it's not going to be 2nd class to some of us regardless of the tier.
How about:
YouTube requires take-down requests to put up money in escrow, enough to cover the costs of fighting a wrongful request and compensate for the consequences
If the request is implemented and then found to be erroneous the payment goes to the victim
Otherwise, after a due period, the requester gets their money back?
If someone makes requests without due care they're essentially gambling on the outcome and as the outcomes are either stake returned or lose then this could get very expensive very quickly if they do it carelessly at scale.
YouTube get to keep the interest on the money in escrow to make it worth their while.
We ask Cook to comment on a well-known case of AI hallucination, a lawyer who cited cases invented by Open AI's Chat GPT. Cook says it was not quite the kind of hallucination the automated reasoning tool could solve. "We could build a database of all known [legal case] results and formalize them," he says. "I'm not sure if that would be the best application."
If you're going to provide cases to cite in a legal argument I'd have thought that it would be an essential application. Or is he saying that the citation provider isn't the best application?
"What developers do when they don't have that capability is quite conservative, call it defensive coding if you like."
Maybe somebody developing, let's say an HR system, might decide it defensive to check whether getting struck by a motor vehicle and shot in the foot is something that might require sick leave. It might also include things like checking that a driver has delivered all the packages that should have been delivered at a delivery point, checking that everything that went into a warehouse can be found when it's time to despatch and a whole lot of other things that Amazon coding doesn't do.