Re: Don't panic
And there, folks, is the Birmingham City Council situation nailed in one post.
40470 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
ISTR someone suggesting in December that the explanation for the W10 gain in December was that with the holidays the number of accesses from home (W10) had cone up and those from work (W11) had gone down simply because users were at home instead of at work. In that case a reversal in January was to be expected.
With the current fad for only bothering to write websites for a limited number of browsers it gets more and more difficult for a lot of sites. Even my own NextCloud needs Firefox which is stupid given that SM is built on FF. Just download the file, untar it in /opt and add an entry for /opt/seamonkey/seamonkey to your menu.
I tried it. It half works. It displays the basic form, finds the date, loads this weeks event list but does not respond to any controls. Maybe I'll poke about at it some more and see if I can get it working properly. Currently on 2.53.20 SM, It's encouraging to know it still does work, thanks for that Jou.
The closest to "dark theme" is still "Metal Lion"
Default theme is to use the system theme which is what Mage wanted. Presumably if your desktop theme is a dark theme (anathema to me but we all have our preferences) it would automatically follow.
A recent annoyance is that for the last few releases Lighting (calendar) has become a tab rather than a separate window and I can't see a way to change that.
"MS's market share is held up by the number of dodgy users who didn't quite find their way to buying a licenced copy."
The only market share they care about is the number of purchased licences. They're in the marketplace to sell. What wasn't bought wasn't sold.
What they were hoping for was that everyone would run out to buy new H/W to replace the old and with it a new Windows licence. A potential problem was people who'd recently bought W10 and might get rounded up into a class action to fatten lawyers at Microsoft's expense. That was bought off with a free upgrade provided the H/W was "modern enough" ("ooh, look, TPM2's just what we need").
But if somebody isn't buying W11 accompanied by new H/W it's much the same whether they stay on W10 or migrate to Linux, as least in the short to medium term. Unless, of course, they can be sold a subscription extended support. That's an even better wheeze than a perpetual licence and opens the door nicely to W12 being subscription only.
You'd think that but they don't seem to realise that. They seem to think that if it's a paid-for product they'll somehow be able to get actual support rather than a stream of patches.
I remember the times when we (a) bought a licence for server S/W and (b) paid for support, usually at 15% of licence fee. Support not only included updates but also a phone number with someone knowledgeable to answer it (promptly AFAICR) with escalation to even more knowledgeable people.
For commercial use free as in beer isn't necessarily a stumbling block and there are a number of companies who will support free as in speech S/W - and it's the free as in speech that enables that to happen.
"The company is fervently hoping that users are listening."
Are they?
I'm sure somebody there has been working out how much money they can make by selling extended support o an ongoing basis to those who won't buy a "perpetual" licence for W11 as part of a hardware replacement.
I'm also sure that there must be plenty of customers who have been working out how much they can save by subscribing to extended support instead of replacing H/W.
And someone else at Microsoft noting how easy it is to get customers to slip into thinking of the whole of Windows a subscription service rather than a perpetual licence and that by doing so they free themselves of dependence on H/W refresh cycles.
"All these things take time, but ultimately Europe is going to have to on-shore its tech services "
Building up tech services is likely to happen much more quickly than building up manufacturing, especially if the manufacturing has to be bootstrapped as a result of shooting oneself in the foot with tariffs (pauses to fret over mixed metaphor). Building up tech services will be even easier if there's a glut of H/W because of the footgun.
"Nobody should be doing timely things in email"
I've successfully conducted a conversation in near real time between myself in UK & someone in California discussing a piece of genealogical evidence that had just come to light. Near real time because it would involve pauses to thing about something or look something up. But we used the evidence to resolve a problem by email in under an hour. It was as effective as standing in front of a board brainstorming.
"That email chain could have been a 30-second chit-chat"
And the next day everyone who took part in the chit-chat has a different recollection of what was decided. And the chit-chat was probably a break in the 3 hour meeting.
Asked whether Dell has any financial data that suggests working from the office leads to better productivity or results, a spokesperson said, "We continually evolve our business so we're set up to deliver the best innovation, value and service to our customers and partners. That includes more in-person connections to drive market leadership."
That's a really long-winded way to say "No."
Agreed. But need to ensure that the ban is followed. Fines at corporate level may well be an accepted cost of doing business. There needs to be personal criminal liability for directors. Directors because it's a role defined in company law, otherwise either it gets difficult to define the responsibility in a way that doesn't leave loopholes or the liability gets pushed down onto somebody who did not make the decision and lacked the authority to countermand it.
And, of course, it's easy to explain risk in non-technical terms to the board "You could all go to jail for up to five years and be disbarred from holding directorships."
"At this stage, no-one in their right mind should be buying into a new MS technology until- and if- it's shown itself to be a proven and established success that won't be ditched six months or a year down the line."
Which is close to a self-fulfilling prophecy of dooe.
Yup. AFAICS FTTC was being implemented in the areas where it was easiest - higher density of housing meaning few cabinets serving many houses. Then with the push to FTTP they're reworking exactly those same areas because every 100m of fibre laid passes many houses instead of one or two. It was obvious that they'd do this instead of continuing the FTTC roll-out. If FTTC hadn't got as far as a given village before it wasn't going to once the priority had been switched and neither was FTTP. So much for universal provision. Naturally the altnets would see the opportunity.
So two thirds of people aren't choosing to pay extra for performance for which they don't see the need and receive a product lacking resilience in the face of power failure? Who could have seen that coming.
They might have got better uptake by running fibre out to those places where FTTC is inadequate but then it would have cost a lot more for each house passed.