Re: Off to a bad start
If you don't understand shell scripting you have no business running a Unix type server.
42500 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I've had a brief look at the FreeBSD derivative PC-BSD. My initial reaction was that something needs to be done about the Byzantine software management. There are packages and PBIs (push button installers) and a stack of stuff that just sits in the ports tree and isn't visible to the local system's software management. Clearly that stuff needs to be compiled up into PBIs and made accessible via a single management tool that will list the whole of what's available irrespective of whether it's a package or a PBI.
As Debian on BSD kernels seems to have been one of the casualties of systemd maybe some of the folk who were working on that will turn their attention to either PC-BSD or an alternative derivative. After all, they should have the aptitude for it.
"I do find it mind-boggling that the US justice system manages to find 44 different names for basically a single offence."
It doesn't say they did. There were 18 counts of one thing & 15 of another. That's 3/4 of them under just two headings.
Presumably you've no great experience of how courts work.
"They are written in plain English and ask only the most pertinent questions. By contrast, the US system contains dozens of mind-boggling questions designed to cover every eventuality."
Plain English & simplicity are good goals. But as they probably can't cover every eventuality there needs to be a good escalation procedure to get a human into the loop quickly to deal with the corner cases. And that needs to be a knowledgeable and empowered human, not a script-driven hell-desk worker who can do no more than web-site does. And escalation needs to be built into the system by design not added on when everything starts to fall apart.
I think most customer service failures result from a lack of this; if at first you don't succeed try and fail again.
"so far lawyers and the law seems to still have some respect for Wills & the contents therof"
That's not surprising given that they make money from them.
OTOH they are likely to point out that there is good reason for the company to be told about the death; the deceased would have been one party to whatever contracts were in place so the other party would, I've thought, have reasonable expectations of being informed as part of the executors' duties.
But surely the executors should have access to the account in order to clear up the deceased's affairs. Whilst the T&Cs may make it clear that music "bought" on iTunes is only leased other files such as those originated by the deceased and correspondence received are part of the estate. They may possibly of value as IP in themselves but they may also contain information which the executors need to finalize the deceased's estate.
'The offence is punishable by way of “fine only” - up to £5,000 in a magistrates' court or an unlimited fine in Crown court. The ICO continues to call for more effective deterrent sentences, including the threat of prison in the most serious cases, to deter the unlawful use of personal information.'
What's the point of calling for more effective sentences & then failing to make use of the existing sentencing regime by not taking this to the Crown Court?
"Wow, that is old!"
No it isn't. It's GSM. Before GSM was TACS. And as the guy who had the (TACS) Steel pointed out in another post, before that was System 4 which ran in parallel with TACS for a while being shut down in the early '90s IIRC. I assume before that there must have been 3 previous generations. So much for 2G, 3G etc.
I don't know about the 9210 but the 9110 had a VT100 emulation mode - 80x24 in minuscule characters.
Back in the day I had the box I was minding email me reports from all the overnight runs so in the morning I'd normally check them through to make sure everything was running OK.
The IIUG (Informix user group) was organising a chapter in the UK. They called for interested parties to a meeting with a couple of US members to set up a local committee so I went along. After the meeting we somehow ended up sitting round a table in a pub's beer garden. I opened the phone dialled into the modem in the back of the server (you could get away with such things in those days), fired up elm & rather belatedly ran through the reports. One of the US guys was sitting next to me & could hardly believe it; shouted to the other "Look here. He's DBAing his box on his phone!". Nice to get one over on the Yanks.
"Cloud&Heat believes it can save on data center facility and cooling costs."
Given that their rent is effectively negative and paid up front they're saving more than that.
" Once the installation fee is paid... for a period of fifteen years."
And what if C&H goes permanently titsup in significantly less than 15 years? That's €12,000 down the drain for their landlords - and maybe the German equivalent of the bailiffs knocking at the front door to demand the racks.
Agreed. Fraud, Computer Misuse Act, probably a few others. This didn't get passed far enough up the prosecution food chain. At the very least it should have got him a conviction that would result in him being blocked as a company director along with any other penalties.
You're right in that it comes down to the programmers in the first place. Round the programmers there's an environment with attitudes ranging from "It compiles, ship it" to "Only release when we're sure it's right". And those attitudes can be found in organisations writing closed or open source.
You're also right in saying there are few eyes and brains willing (and, I'd add, able) to review code.
OTOH you say "It's not strange that all discoveries come from professional researches who have an economic incentive in hunting them". Are those professional researchers going to have an easier job with source they can read or with black boxes?
"BT has been elbowing its way back into the consumer mobile space it abandoned in 2002 with the sale of Cellnet, which later became O2."
IIRC Cellnet, originally only part owned by BT, & BT Mobile were merged to become O2 which was then hived off as a separate company for which Telefonica made a takeover bid and won.
It always seemed to me to be a daft move for a major telecoms business to get out of mobile. But understandable; within BT Mobile the rest of BT was known as "Big BT" and it wasn't a term of affection.
What seems to have been forgotten by TPTB is that in a democracy policing must be by consent, at least of the majority. It should also be in accord with the law including the presumption of innocence.
To put it bluntly, if random stop and search mostly affects black inner city youths the more one differs from that demographic the less one is likely to object. As the majority are sufficiently different there is so little objection as to amount to consent.
However, surveillance by mass trawl with no effective oversight puts everyone's privacy at risk. In those circumstances it would be wrong to assume consent and no legal cover by way of PATRIOT or DRIP can substitute for that.
And if I hear "if you have nothing to hide..." being trotted out I take it as a sure sign that the presumption of innocence is being abandoned. Apart from anything else, it would be fair to ask anyone coming out with that one what their bank account, PIN login credentials etc are - after all, if they've nothing to fear why should they hide them?
'Rodoy said she thought the service offered a "trusted, safe storage medium"'
Did the fact that it was someone else's computer not register?
Still, she's getting some benefit of the Streisand effect.
Personally, I'd not think twice about laser eye surgery; I'd think an infinite number of times. No surgery, no contact lenses. You only get one pair of eyes & it's not worth risking damage when specs are so much safer.
"we know what caused this particular megadisaster, and it wasn't a senior manager; as mentioned in the article, it was an inexperienced member of IT staff screwing up a batch job."
And whose responsibility is it to ensure that inexperienced members of staff aren't in a position to make such a big screw-up and to ensure that there are robust fall-backs in place?
The buck stops - has to stop - with senior management. If they want big pay then they should earn it by ensuring that this stuff can't happen. And the best time to do that is before it happens, not after.
"Corprorate penalties are useless, they're just passed on to customers and employees."
Fairly simple solution. The fine must be paid from the senior management bonus fund. And if a particular year's fund isn't big enough, just roll it on.
OK, only fairly simple because it needs a mechanism to stop the fund being inflated by the amount of the fine.
The same could be applied to all those "here's a few quid and we'll just keep keeping on" responses to complainants. Those few quid should come out of staff bonus funds. When they get depleted enough the staff learn to be more careful.
"(b) Government does SFA to prevent overheating and it all collapses in a pile of shit (2007 - Northern Rock)"
This was the result of the brilliant idea of using interest rates to manage inflation and then using a measure on inflation that excluded cost of housing. As if housing was just an insignificant part of household expenses.
"From my reading (I haven't finished CI21C, obviously) Piketty's most stimulating point is that capital/wealth concentrates until war destroys it. If we want to create a society without war we must find other ways to constantly redistribute capital/wealth or else bad things."
If this is what he says then he has a very poor grasp on history and logic.
Firstly there are a number of other ways in which wealth is destroyed - fire, flood, drought, disease, lack of maintenance, spendthrift heirs ... history has seen them all.
Secondly the implication here seems to be that there is something happening that requires such concentrations to be destroyed and that invokes wars to do it so that wars are an inevitable consequence of those concentrations. Even given the curious leap of logic which come up with that requirement the other means of destroying such concentrations doesn't require wars.
Finally, even if we accept the first sentence the second is a non sequitur. Aggressive behaviour in humans appears to be innate. Even with an equitable distribution of wealth we would find things to fight about.
To: randomemailname@randomemailprovider
From: aparentanglosaxonname@woulrbeseo.com
(paraphrased)
We are so expert in everything internet-related that we're the dogs bollocks in SEO. We don't send spam. Just send us money and tell us the site you want promoting because it would be a waste of our time using our vast skills to work it out.
Signed with a distinctly un-Anglo-Saxon name
The strange thing is that one of these landed in my internet /dev/null - AKA Hotmail/Live/Outlook/${this year's favoured brandname} addressed to someone else completely with absolutely nothing in the headers to tell how it got there apart from the fact that it originated from a Hotmail/etc user & possibly their internal routing has gone wrong.
It's worth actually reading what this report is about. ICO have had penalties overturned by a tribunal which is making it difficult for them to proceed on other cases because they're concerned that that could happen again (it's not stated but I expect they're worried about having their budget bled by having costs awarded against them). They're wanting to have the criteria for level of nuisance reduced so they don't get tribunals finding against them in future.
"I expect that they would lose in court,"
Why? If the fakes have FTDI's logo etc on them then it's just the sort of thing trademark legislation is intended to deal with. I don't know about your jurisdiction but in the UK Trading Standards legislation could be used to protect customers.