Re: For people who cannot they see the wood for the trees
"That all depends on the kind of forests you are cutting down"
Bramley on M27?
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Perhaps the solution is a rather drastic one. Take the patient to the bank, introduce them to a customer service (sic) person, tell them you've an urgent appointment elsewhere but to give you a call once they've sorted out whatever it is. I think that PDQ they'd work out a procedure to enable them to accept you as the patient's representative.
"I can hire developers anywhere in the world, but I have to find them. How do I know that somebody in ToadSuck Ak is any good? Unless they are the inventor of Python/Ruby/etc then I am comparing them to somebody in India charging $1/hour on Elancer."
If you're considering recruiting on the basis of whether someone was the original dev of a big project you're probably doing it wrong. Firstly as there are very few of them they're not likely to be available. Secondly, they may not be the current project leads; they may not even have been involved with the project very long. Thirdly, and most importantly, you're overlooking the fact that any open source developer's contributions are a portfolio that you, personally, can review. You can actually make a comparison between the ToadSuck developer and the $1/hour Indian if they've contributed to open source projects.
"By coming to work in the valley they have proven to me they are good because they were hired by %BIG NAME%," so your main recruitment technique is poaching? Then if %BIG NAME%s start using remote developers you'll start poaching those once you've realised that that's how things are going.
"or simply have proved that they can earn enough to pay rent here." Actually all they may have proved is that they've managed, by fair means or foul, enough stake money to rent a pad there and hope to get hired. Whether they can actually stay hired is unproven.
"all accountants are equally good-enough, or I can judge how good they are easily." So you go by your judgement for the skill of accountants but not developers if you depend on someone else having hired them first?
"Firms in the same trade end up setting up alongside each other simply because it's more convenient to do so. That's where all the skilled workers you're going to poach are, after all."
The corollary of that being that that's where all the firms who are going to poach all your skilled workers are so you have to get together with them to set up anti-poaching agreements.
Where physical work is concerned there may still be a rationale for clustering. If you have a non-ferrous metalwork plant you need to be in a place where there's a concentration of skilled staff to operate it and conversely if you're a skilled operator you need to be in a place where there are firms with plant needing operators. But where the plant is mostly laptops that the skilled staff can afford to own and a server which can be located anywhere & rented then "where" resolves to "any place with an internet connection".
The consequence is that a dispersed workforce has demonstrated the ability to collaborate produce major operating systems and other substantial S/W. Maybe for many types of creative work the clustering concept is already dead, it just hasn't lain down yet.
All premises-provided presentation kit will trip you up and the more modern the tech the greater its ability to do so. Projectors will have been configured to work only the resident technician's own device, possibly a Sharp Zaurus or nothing at all.
But modern tech isn't needed for this. I recall the conference with a slide projector set to timed autoadvance so the presenters had to keep back-pedalling the remote to stay on the slide long enough to talk about it. Presenters can still score their own goals; I remember one lecturer turning up to give a lecture - in a theatre shared by his own department! - with a set of slides larger than 35mm but still too small for the ancient alternative projector.
Back in the day I had a lucky escape from being a terrorist victim (I handled a booby-trapped weapon in the course of my job). So do I support all this surveillance? No. It implies a suspension of the presumption of innocence which is one of the basic elements of freedom under the law.
"How is this the fault of any individual (apart from the person clicking the link)?"
Quite. You've answered your own question.
"At least make it a two stage process where they have to download it first, and then explicitly execute it."
The problem here is the file which looks like something else but which is, in fact, executable in disguise such as PDFs taking advantage of exploits in the reader.
"Political parties often break election promises; it is hardly fair to single out the Lib Dems as uniquely poor in this respect. But on the plus side, given the kicking they are getting over the student fees backtrack, they may be more wary of backtracking again."
To be fair to the Lib-Dems, they've always been a party for protest voters. They probably never expected having to have their policies confront the real world so they could promise anything.
"> Do you really think it's a moral decision on Microsoft's part?
Nope. I think they're pushing privacy as a brand-differentiation,"
I don't think it's even that. They know it will be difficult to impossible for them, as a US company, to peddle cloud stuff into a good many markets. Note that: as a US company. The same applies to other US companies as well. If they lose they leave those markets open to non-US companies to move in and take over. It's not brand-differentiation, it's country differentiation. That's why they have so many amicus briefs from the rest of the US industry.
"I like the way paying NSA/GCHQ to store your data is seen as something positive."
That was my first reaction given the name. But, as there's 17G spare plus an SD card slot, restricting oneself to local storage might not be too terrible, depending on the speed with which successive updates bloat Windows to fill the other 17G. An alternative OS could avoid that problem. But with no exchangeable battery I suppose it's intended to be disposable so it might be a race between battery decay and Windows bloat.
"show me my files in relation to each other associated by relevance"
Given the same collection of files we might have different ideas as to relevance and those ideas themselves might well change with task.
"I would like a freeform filesystem that does not care about directories, but lets me organize my files in many different ways simultaneously"
I doubt you'd make this work without some concept of containers for file, which is what directories are. Given that Unix & Unix-like systems do much of what you suggest. A single file can appear in multiple directories simultaneously; a "file in a directory" is really a pointer to a single occurrence of the data in a collection of such pointers.
Although the directories themselves form a single hierarchy they can be symbolically linked into other directories but navigating them can be confusing as each directory has only a single parent. However file managers such as Dolphin in KDE keep track of how you got to a particular directory & use Back & Forward buttons to navigate the network of real & symbolic links.
"I would like to not have to open a separate application for every file I use"
Different sorts of data require different handling. Passively viewing data is reasonably straightforward. A WP document can contain image and tabular data, for instance. The demands of editing any type of data are much greater than those of viewing so a single all-purpose editor is likely to be either humongously too big to use, both in memory and interface* or too limited in scope which may be why the like of Works got rolled over by office suites. And then, to meet everyone's needs you'd need to add CAD, GIS and all sorts of other applications. One size does not fit all.
*Some interface functions such as opening and closing files are common but imagine an application which had all the controls of a whole office suite included in a single interface.
"tear-off menus/palettes"
Probably OK if you're only dealing with one thing at a time. If I have multiple PDFs or other documents open for consultation whilst writing something else I think I'd quickly get confused which torn-off menu belonged to which document.
A good deal of what you want can be supplied by the web. HTML can provide the flexible filing system & the browser can effectively hide the multiple applications. If you don't mind keeping all your data on someone else's computer maybe a Chromebook is what you need.
The MS product that impressed me most was Fortran on CP/M. Previous to that Fortran was punched cards and a computer that filled a large air-conditioned room. Now it was something that ran on a small box into which extra hardware (ADC for instance) could be plugged. And thanks to INP and OUT statements added to the language that hardware could be accessed directly. Anything later was an anticlimax or a step in the wrong direction.
"the days of floppy disks"
Ah, floppies. Back in the days of SCO my Oldham-based client had an offshoot in London. If they lost the HD SCO had to be reinstalled from about half a million floppies - at least that's what it felt like. I quickly learned that if I had to go down to do that I also had to take a spare floppy drive. It was a reprographics office and after a while enough the toner got into the drive to ruin it. Then there was the day when the operator rung up to say the ceiling had just fallen in on his desk....
"When you start drawing from your pension fund, at retirement time, you will pay taxes on your pension income, just as if you were receiving a job paycheck."
That depends on the tax levels. The pension investments are likely to be getting relief at the highest marginal rates of the worker's tax. The pension income is going to have the pensioner's tax allowances set against it, then the lowest tax band etc. It might never have any portion fall into the highest possible tax band: mine certainly doesn't :(
"If privacy were legislated, those free services might disappear. Most users like the services, indeed have come to depend on them, and don't think it costs them anything."
As per another comment, you're confusing tracking & advertising. However with respect to advertising there's a workaround. What's needed is a browser add-in that will accept the adds without displaying them & even generate click-throughs without displaying the results. The user would be able to set a cap of the amount of data actually accepted. Everybody wins. The users don't get pissed off by ads. The websites get paid. The advertisers gain by not LOSING business by pissing off potential customers.
"a switch to mono"
It seems that DAB really missed its mark. It needed to match or exceed existing standards such as FM or CD in quality in order to find a place in stereo rigs. It didn't so AFAICS most DAB kit sold is the little portable mono radio spec. It's not surprising if broadcast channels switch to match the bulk of receivers in use.
"CH.gov.uk → redirects to GDS front page → Find Company info → Start Now → old CH front page exactly as it was, with the useful search box right on the front page"
Which you then bookmark and continue to use. Isn't GDS wonderful? - it helped you to do that.
"If you want to run a successful commercial business, you need a professional partner who will have your back and ensure there are no potential legal threats. If you just want to run a toe-jam harvesting co-operative, then by all means use F/OSS."
This reminded me of the time when the client's invoicing run broke on the second successive Friday lunchtime (see icon) by blowing up the database engine. Although it was a proprietary application we had the source code to most of it so, after repairing the damage, I spent the rest of the afternoon going through the it & rung up the profession partner, i.e. vendor, to tell them how to write code that didn't cause to engine to keep taking bites of memory without releasing them. Free or not there's a benefit to having the source.
"In many European countries the same ones opposing NSA style dragnet spying, also supported laws which forbid or restrict police to maintain databases with DNA and other information. If the police is allowed to keep DNA, fingerprint, voice recognition and facial recognition information of all registered citizens, crime fighting would be considerably easier, and perhaps the dragnet surveillance can be terminated."
You need to take a little care in stating your case. The objection to retaining DNA etc records is not to retention per se but in retaining records of people who have not been convicted. There is, in English law, a principle of presumption of innocence. That is one of the main protections against wrongful accusation.
With that correction made the reason why we oppose all these things is because they have one thing in common: abuse of due process of law. The notion of due process has been part of English law for 800 years this year; we like that. I think even David Cameron, were he to think about it, would baulk at celebrating the anniversary of Magna Carta by abolishing it.