Re: Cited LLM test invalid?
"still not understanding"
Stopping there would be sufficient.
42407 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
It wasn't that they were lazy, it's just that they were being taught to pass exams. They knew that when they'd learned a definition there would be a question in the exam that would ask what is so and so and they'd trot out that definition and it would be a complete and correct answer. They were given no instruction as to how what they learned connected to anything outside of that.
Perhaps you've never raised children.
The first few years of of life are spent making contact with reality and learning how to interact with it starting with suckling, being weaned, crawling about and then learning to deal with gravity by standing on their own feet. They learn that some things are hot, some are cold. Seeing is coordinated with touch - the 2d projection on the retina, which is what the brain receives as vision has to be coordinated with the discovered 3d world so that the projection is interpreted as a view of a world full of objects of different shapes and distances away. Sounds become interpreted as language which is about the only thing in common with LLMs but in the growing child's mind the symbols of words become associated with those objects seen and encountered in the solid. That understanding of words meaning something is in place before more abstract concepts are introduced.
That's the connection that the human brain has and the LLM isn't going to have.
" AI models lack the ability to understand concepts the way people do"
Does this come as any surprise?
But humans can do this too. I'm reminded of one of Feynman's stories about teaching physics in Brazil. The students were learning parrot fashion. They could reel off definitions of Brewster angles etc. but were surprised when asked to look through a polarising filter at light reflected off the sea. They didn't realise that that's what their definitions were describing. Nevertheless they had a better chance than LLMs - they existed in the physical world of reality, LLMs do not; they can't look at the sea.
"this vulture has seen more dinsinformation from anti-vaxxers than in the year so far"
Liam, just tell them that antivax is a Deep State conspiracy to eliminate the more gullible from the gene pool - it's too late to deal with parents but by getting them not to vaccinate the F1 generation there's a good chance of their not being an F2. Tell them the MMR rumour was particularly clever because be concentrating on the first M, measles it totally distracted from the second M, mumps. If their sons catch that by not being vaccinated they'll be firing blanks - no grandchildren to look forward to.
It should chime with their way of thinking. If it gets seeded well enough it could spread to eat the anti-vax conspiracy.
If by credentials they mean an email address and password then 23&Me do carry some responsibility. Most people have a single email address. If they insisted on a non-email address - even better, assigned a unique one - then a harvested set of credentials from another site would have been useless.
Some years ago there was a paper in Nature which based on cluster analysis of DNA profiles plotted geographically. The criterion was grand parents (or possibly GGparents. I don't recall exactly) all being born within a given radius. Highland Britain and Ireland showed quite a number of regional variations. Lowland England was more or less a single cluster. That included Norfolk - indistinguishable from the rest. Fun facts included Ireland clearly showed up the four provinces and N & S Wales were distinct from each other.
"Customer privacy is at the core of TTAM's mission of helping individuals gain insight into, and benefit from, their genetic information. TTAM is committed to adhering to 23andMe's existing privacy policies of always honoring customers with choice and transparency."
Don't say you weren't warned.
"You cannot exist without email these days."
I suppose it depends on what the subscription rates are. Outside of the freebie* gmail/$WhateverMicrosoftCurrentlyCallsIt/ISP service it's reasonable to pay for a email - it costs the MSP to provide it - and the ISP provided service isn't really free anyway.
A bare service using POP3, delete on download isn't going to cost that much per seat but it means individual clients will be storing the emails otherwise you can always run Roundcube etc locally.
* As in -->
You're really paying in kind.
Two alternative answers.
1. Without seeing the exact details I suspect this encryption includes everything between the client and the storage medium. If that's the case it provided protection over and above what the network may already provide (on-prem that might well be nothing) so that it can't be observed by an eavesdropper or queried by anyone without an encryption key.
2. The cynical answer: it ticks another box on the ISO9000 inspired checklist.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other. The middlemen will have done whatever work was needed to set up the deal. Once that's in place Microsoft doesn't need them. It's hard to differentiate between the two who's the parasite and who's being parasitised.
Of course we know who's really being parasitised - the users.
"if there was a window manager that was a perfect clone of Windows 10's UI, including the file manager for saving stuff and the printer dialog for printing stuff."
There seems to be a cottage industry in W10-type styling for KDE: https://store.kde.org but I'm not sure anyone would want to emulate the Windows file manager that closely. For some reason it seems to display two similar - but not quite - lists of places for reasons I've never quite understood. However if she could accept something simpler KDE Dolphin might do. AFAICS print dialogs are not consistent between applications.
"the larger screen can be solved without using Windows"
Of course it can. 17" laptop and Devuan works just fine.
However, you've just set me wondering. Your iPhone Mini idea works well in an hotel room where there's a TV. I'm thinking of a super-portable to take into archives where there wouldn't be that luxury but I need something to drive the USB document camera. I don't think my 15" laptop is much lighter than the 17" although that's what I used last week. But a lightweight monitor and a Pi might be a good combo... Where as that Aldi where somebody snagged a cheap monitor recently?
"It added that 44 percent of the 682 unique IPs executing scans within the past 90 days (as of June 25) came from Tencent Cloud, with the others coming from Amazon, Cloudflare, and Google."
I suppose the sort of people we're dealing with here will pay with cryptocurrency assuming the cloud providers will accept it. It might be a smart regulatory move to make the providers require verified banking details which would enable seizure of at least some assets and a starting point for attempts to trace the perpetrators.