HSBC
You'd think that by now HSBC would have added Linux as a desktop platform that they recognise.
40432 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Back when owning a generic dot com domain was supposed to be the ticket to success, there was the famous crash and burn Pets.com. I've never visited that site before, but I did just now to check on it before making this post. There's no site at pets.com, it's just a re-direct to another domain that I've never heard of that sells pet supplies."
A few minutes with whois shows that pets.com was last modified late last year. The other domain was registered a few years ago. So it's possible that the pets.com domain was acquired fairly recently by the owners of other site who elected to keep their existing site - and existing customer recognition - and do the redirect as a quick fix. Not saying that that's what happened but you can't draw too many conclusions from a redirected name.
"This one is going to be particularly hard to fix"
Really? I paused reading when I got to the sentence that said fixes were available, installed them which took less than a minute, carried on reading and then went to the comments section where, of course, I found exactly the sort of comment I expected.
Write to your local MP. Suggest they get together with various members of their friends & family of a reasonably wide range of age groups. Get each one to check his smartphone for apps which use encryption. Ask them what their reaction would be if those apps were made illegal. Point out that the likely results would make the Cameron policy the shortest political suicide note in history (your MP should get the reference).
Also point out that criminals, including terrorists, disregard laws. Although the MP's constituents would be affected by such legislation and considerably angered by it the terrorists wouldn't. They'd have sufficient resources to roll their own apps; the strong encryption genie has been out of the bottle for a couple of decades now and it isn't going back, ever. So all that will have been achieved is a large bunch of unhappy voters and a smaller bunch of uninconvenienced terrorists.
AKA Tom King. It looks like wonkpedia's account may need to be rewritten:
"King's career in the Cabinet may appear odd to some observers due to his many quick moves between departments. The moves were a reflection of his ability to 'master his brief' quickly, and as successive crises hit the government it was King who was moved to fill the gap. King never had a strong public profile compared to other members of the Cabinet, but neither did he draw attention to himself by elementary errors or public gaffes."
Of course there's an alternative explanation of why he got moved round so much...
Similar experience except, being a bit more public spirited I asked them to hang on and then put the phone to one side. I reckon that whilst they were hanging on they weren't pestering anyone else. But I'm sure there's a don't-even-bother list that gets sold to spammers.
"businesses demanding your contact details"
Lie.
In the case of UK registered businesses Companies House is your friend - Webcheck will give you their registered office which is an excellent contact address to use. Unfortunately it's had the .gov.uk makeunder & isn't as easy to find as it used to be.
"Well no, then again, the absolutely last thing you want to do is bring professional extortionists into a business model."
Let's examine that a little.
Maybe you haven't had the experience I've had of being in a taxi that's crashed*. If you had & had been injured then you'd need some compensation for loss of earnings or any out-of-pocket costs arising from that. As the taxi driver himself might not be able to afford this you'd rely on the driver's insurance.
The driver's insurance costs will in turn be based on certain assumptions. If the driver is assumed to be involved in the sort of mileage and passenger carrying levels of a private motorist then the insurance company will be rating the risk as much less than that to which they were really carrying**. And in that case they may refuse to pay and you'd be seriously out of pocket. That may be a risk you wish to take but most taxi passengers probably won't agree with you.
*No injuries to me or the other passengers. I'm not sure about the car he T-boned; it was amazing how quickly another taxi arrived to remove all possible witnesses.
**The alternative, of course, is that the insurance companies spread the taxi drivers' risks across all motorists so that the many of us who aren't taxi drivers subsidise those who are.
The comment on the New Scientist report at http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26844-human-ancestors-got-a-grip-on-tools-3-million-years-ago.html#.VMIwqv6sXTo give this a different slant. The squeeze grip is related to climbing (my first reaction to reading the report here was much the same) and the precision grip has a possible alternative origin in peeling fruit.
"So you're already committing to a platform that isn't released, stabilised, proven or even gained a mentionable user base?"
It makes sense. His company's customers are looking at kit with an EoL in, say 2030.* W2K has EoL in 2020. 8.* has EoL when? Of course they're going to want something that has a long life in front of it.
* Industrial kit has to run for a long time, that's why folk are finding it difficult to get away from XP and when I retired in 2006 my client had industrial printers still going strong which, as far as I could make out, had W95 embedded.
"Why bother using labour-saving technology in the first place if we don't want to save people from labour?"
The problem then is how to distribute the products of the technology. The employment route achieves this by paying employees who use the payments to buy the products and services which they and other employees produced.
'"""Windows 7 doesn’t work with Microsoft app-store apps."""
They say it like it's a bad thing.'
Or as if they couldn't provide an app-store for W7 apps.
What is this app-store thing anyway? Is it something like Synaptic which I can run to install most of the stuff I need on Debian?
True. But the sentence before the one you quoted reads "Windows 10 will be delivered as a service to offer a safer, innovative and updated experience for the supported lifetime of the device." This is the one that introduces two doubts.
1. What does "as a service" mean? As long as you keep paying us?
2. What does "supported lifetime" mean?
Until these are clarified people are not going to drop their long-held habit of distrusting Microsoft and all the suits who sail in her.
'The problem is that tricky phrase, "for the supported lifetime of the device".'
I have a VM running W7. It started off as what seemed a reasonable size for a VM which only runs one application for which I don't have as good a substitute on Linux. However every time it got patched it grew and grew. Now, despite applying the "clean system files" option (or whatever it's called) firing up the VM brings up error messages about not having enough room for swap files.
So maybe "the supported lifetime of the device" means "the time it takes to bloat over all the drive it was installed on".
"Read and digest: http://philstephens.com.au/security-for-google-drive-businesses/"
I had a quick look. I came across this "Instead of documents being emailed around the company, they can be shared via email. This means that all that is sent is a link."
What's to stop emailing links being done if the storage is in-house? Alternatively, what's to stop complete docs being emailed if storage is on someone else's computer?
Whilst not wishing to cast aspersions on Google's security measures (other, of course, than the fact that they're open to hidden NSA demands in a way that an in-house system isn't, a major consideration if you're in the EU) the generic issue still exists. You're now dealing with three attack surfaces, the in-house one which may now be smaller; someone else's which, as another commentator has pointed out, you can't visit or audit its physical security; and the connections between the two.
It's not Luddism to point out the smoke and mirrors. Nevertheless, maybe I'll adopt "and Enoch shall break them" as a sig.
"Most businesses could move their entire organisation to the cloud storage and web apps, and get themselves some proper security. (with cloud storage, users don't email docs, all the security is handled serverside with 2 factor auth)."
s/cloud storage/someone else's computer/g
What's this "security" of which you write?
"A good marketing person makes you think YOU came up with the idea of NEEDING it"
Meanwhile, back in the real world, real marketing people make me realise that they're trying to make me think that I came up with the idea of needing whatever it is. And succeed in pissing me off to the extent that even if, by some remote chance, I actually need whatever it is I'll buy it from someone else.
"it doesn't mean that El Reg has to plaster the picture of him"
But it doesn't mean you have to see it. Just block all images from regmedia.co.uk until they get over this redesign nonsense. You'll lose one or two meaningful things from time to time but on the whole the signal to noise ratio will be greatly enhanced.