Re: Hmm, air travel or autonomous vehicles
"At this point most air travel is accomplished, for the most part, in autonomous vehicles."
What's the minimum separation between aircraft in flight?
41776 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Thinking about it though Volvos position of accepting liability is just crazy. We have to assume that some self driving cars will have accidents and some of the time it will be the cars fault."
No, it will never be the car's fault. Lawyers are not only are they more effective than engineers at avoiding accidents, they can do so after the event.
@ Gordan
Banks don't email? Worse. They employ marketing companies to email on their behalf with the From: field set to look as if it's the bank's domain when a quick chase through the headers reveals that it's not. Often there are embedded links which aren't to the banks emails. They've been teaching their customers to fall for phishing scams for years. Retail banking is run by marketing wonks who wouldn't recognise security if it came up to them & bit them in the arse.
"We appreciate the frustration this causes our customers and thank them for their patience,”
Translation: "we seem to be getting away with doing nothing".
Why should they bother to do anything if their customers are gormless* enough not to get another email service?
*With a nod to the thread on Lester's article.
"Lawyers have a habit of biting onto the minutiae of legal niceties and missing the bigger business picture."
Especially in the publishing world it seems. One organisation has been reported putting the bite on the reading of books to groups of children in libraries. Anybody would think that children who have been read to aren't likely to spend the rest of their lives as the publishers' market.
This would be a ruling which applies in the US only. If you make much use of Google for out-of-print books you will find there's sometimes a difference between what you can see in the US vs what you can see in the UK. In the US the PDF might be downloadable but the UK only gets a snippet view. Presumably there's a difference in what's considered to be in the public domain between the countries but it's difficult for the user to understand what the criteria are. However proxies are one solution to that. Another is archive.org. One considerable annoyance is that books which have been available in PDF are sometimes withdrawn as someone reprints it.
"How does the author or their estate get paid when they don't know that a book sale had occurred?"
In exactly the same way that they get paid if someone walks into a bookshop, looks through the shelves and finds a book they're interested in. The only difference is that with Google the customers have a search mechanism which enables them to find books they might otherwise have missed.
It seems very unlikely that the US will update its legal system in that time-frame. It also seems unlikely that without such update any arrangement that transfers data to the states will be deemed legal. In reality the deadline applies to businesses to set up arrangements to host data in the EU which will withstand scrutiny. To some extent that depends on the outcome of the MS case but given the speed of the legal process it might be the more practical option to assume the worst. So what to do?
Ensure that data is hosted within the EU in a data centre owned by an EU registered and owned company subject to EU law and staffed by EU personnel. It really shouldn't be that difficult to set up at least not for those with existing EU data centres. This is what I think the senior management of an EU subsidiary of a US company running a data centre over here could do:
Set up a local company managed by the existing senior EU staff and owned by them or some other EU business. This EU company would lease the DC from the US parent. It would set up one or more subsidiaries to run the various lines of business using the parent's IP as franchises. The franchises would operate with contracts under EU law with clauses specifically forbidding any data transfers illegal under EU law. Any US staff remaining in the EU would be employed by the parent as liaison dealing with the local companies at arm's length. Even with a worst case outcome from the MS case there would be no company or person falling under US jurisdiction with any access to the data.
Given that the data centre would be rented this would only require sufficient finance to cover the rent, royalties & salaries until the first franchise payments rolled in. The parent could even lend the money.
By being first in the field they could then offer to set up similar operations for other companies, especially those with no EU presence.
"Microsoft could save money if they stopped messing around with multiple more or less crippled versions of their OS."
It looks as if that's what they're trying to do but not successfully. Beancounters say to board "it'll be cheaper to force everyone onto the same version". Board says to marketing & tech "can we do that". M & T say "sure" - they're not going to risk saying anything else. Everybody wanders out of the meeting with tech muttering between themselves "HTF do we do that?".
The profiling of print media could be applied equally well to web sites. In fact it could be applied better in real time by picking up on the subject of the page. If I search for vacuum cleaners and later visit a gardening site it would make a good deal more sense to show me gardening related ads at that time rather than vacuum cleaner ads. And if I'm looking at pages about greenhouses ads for fruit trees might not be the best choice of gardening ad.
"A new framework and a new format, designed by the people who couldn't even use the existing frameworks in a secure way? What could possibly go wrong?"
I'm prepared to believe that they could manage to do it now they've cottoned onto the fact that they have to. OTOH I'll let others turn off their adblockers first & see what happens.
@dan80
I agree with you but the paragraphs at the tail of the article suggests that the weasels will try to continue as before:
'Cunningham did note that the "lean" initiative would not be aimed at replacing all online ads, and in some cases "lean" ads would be able to run alongside other formats.
"Publishers should have the opportunity to provide rich advertising experiences, LEAN advertising experiences, and subscription services," he said. "Or publishers can simply deny their service to users who choose to keep on blocking ads."'
It will need ad networks that only serve LEAN ads and ad blockers that block everything else to make this work. Publishers and advertisers alike need to learn one simple fact:
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A RICH ADVERTISING EXPERIENCE.
"Ads HAVE TO track you in order for the operator of the Ad network to get credit for generating sales. If they have no metrics for determining if their marketing is effective, they get less money for that advertising."
But presumably there would be a trail leading from a click on the ad to a sale. And that's all the ad agency needs to continuing selling snake-oil to their victimsclients. Any proper feedback, say a button labelled "Never show me any more crap from these weasels", would be excessive.
It's surprising how stuff can escape your attention. After carefully selecting a couple of attractive names for our daughter we never cottoned onto the significance of the initials until they caused a certain amount of confusion about her status when she was a post-grad. It's all resolved now as she's Dr DR ...
" I upgraded my dual-boot Windows 8.1 / Linux Mint laptop to Windows 10 / Linux Mint. Everything worked fine for several weeks and I could boot into either OS as required via the grub menu. ...Windows 10 did several automatic updates and destroyed the dual-boot, making it Windows 10 only."
Probably the original update was at fault as it seems to have failed Windows SOP.
"it will multiply out"
Quite so. The posts that say we're not the target markets (maybe that should be marks?) have missed the point. We're the ones who are advising others. Friends and family who come looking for help with their W10s aren't going to get it, they're going to be directed to alternative OSes.
It's noticeable that many posts on this sort of thread are from people who say they've been MS supporters from way back and who are now changing their minds. MS really have misjudged badly to alienate so many supporters.
"Hardware purchases are not subject to the refund, unless they are provided as part of a managed service."
So any public sector entity competent enough to roll its own gets penalised for not pouring some of its funding into a service provider's profits. In turn that means that there's no incentive for such entities to maintain their own competence. And we wonder why the public sector regularly gets taken to the cleaners by service providers.
Your question has already been answered in relation to a different question. The EU citizen does business with an EU company. That EU company has responsibilities under the relevant data protection legislation. If they fail in that responsibility by passing on the data by the routes you suggest they are liable to the citizen and if they haven't arranged indemnity from their business partner then more fool them.