Re: Bah!
"Just associate .pdf with Chrome..."
I prefer Okular. But there are a few times when AR does a better job, such as copying text from an OCRd multicolumn layout.
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Some of these offences go back a few years. I can understand that there might be a delay in handling a joint enterprise in order to identify all the participants; a premature arrest of some might alert the others and make pursuit more difficult. But some are said to be unrelated. Were these arrests being saved up to make a big headline? If so how do they justify the possibility of allowing the perpetrator to continue unchecked on the one hand or make a fair trial more difficult on the other?
"Frankly, the sooner that such breaches result in massive financial loss and wholesale bankruptcy of a company or corporation, the better."
Whilst I agree with the sentiment if this were to happen to an insurance company it would leave a lot of innocent customers without the insurance cover they'd paid for. Massive financial loss & wholesale bankruptcy of the senior management team and board of directors would be perfectly acceptable, however.
If all the cars were driverless and in communication with adjacent cars would there be sufficient bandwidth for all the inter-car communication?
Imagine a road with four lanes per carriageway, maybe crossing over a similar road, with traffic joining from slip roads, say the M1/M25 junction, all lanes and slip roads working to capacity. The number of vehicles within range would be many time the total number of such cars built to date. How fast would they be generating data?
I think this speech is really a response to the recent suggestion of making the Beeb PTV. It's intended to make whoever that was realise it might be better to let things stay as they are.
What Tony Hall really needs to do to justify licensing is to raise programme standards to what they were at in the heyday by assuming that at least a reasonable proportion of viewers and listeners have an attention span that lasts a whole hour. Horizon would be a good litmus test; it was one of their best achievements in terms of quality achieved over a long run and has subsequently fallen furthest.
"Lumping a TV License in with general tax probably isn't all that bad an idea in the grand scheme of things, as it will likely balance out across the board."
You want a govt controlled broadcaster? Yes I know what some commentators say about the Beeb but a broadcaster actually funded from general taxation would actually be what they think it is now and something very much different to what it really is today.
"Local Radio Sorry don't listen to C&W, Irish language or the non existent language of Ulster-Scots"
Using that as geolocation I suppose you'll understand what I mean when I say that having visited Australia some years ago TV there looked like a choice of multiple channels of UTV.
"Most "blue" flowers photgraph as purple or violet (or at least they did on good old film)."
It depended on the film. Kodachrome had quite a lot of sensitivity in the IR and quite a lot of blue flowers reflected IR. As a result light blue flowers turned out pink. Ektachrome was much better for flower photography.
"the 'obsene profits actually benefit pensioners' card, is played just a tad too often for my taste."
The insertion of "obscene" before "profits", even when spelled correctly, is a bit too much of a cliché for my taste.
The fact remains that if you have savings in pensions, ISAs or whatever you're likely to have some of that in all the big corporations unless you pick a fund that specifically doesn't make such choices. If so then whenever thinking about the behaviour of such corporations it always helps to replace "them" with "me". It also helps to remember that for any corporation of that size all the numbers are going to be big.
Nevertheless, it's a good while since I bought any petrol at a BP forecourt. They're far too dear.
Long ago my job used to involve taking laboratory results which needed to be interpreted in probabilistic terms and try to express these so than non-experts could appreciate the nuances involved. A colleague and I had a standing joke about writing a program which could be fed the data & generate reports in terms such as "not entirely inconsistent with" or "guilty as charged".
As part of my great escape plan I had a job interview with an agency that used psychological tests in using forms consisting of statements & check boxes for reactions. The interviewer took the results into a back room, fed them into an optical mark reader & returned with the resulting profile written in narrative form just as we'd joked about.
What I'd like to find now is a sort of reverse Turing test, one which will tell the difference between a call centre agent and a badly programmed bot.
They may have a list of IP addresses for, say, their employees' homes. But the address used could belong to an employee's parents' home, for example. Until they know who owns the address - and they haven't indicated that they do - they can't know that it doesn't belong to an employee's relative, favourite bar or whatever. And this is starting to read like something Sir Humphrey would have said.
“The events of last week reinforce the principle that customer experience, security and privacy must be our top priorities,”
Reinforce? What they mean is "brought home to us that we should have always known that". If they'd said that then they might have started to look honest in their statements.
It's the same as "your call/privacy/<whatever they've just failed on> is important to us". No it isn't or they'd have worked harder at it.
The only way to make a promise to do better look credible is to for a company to admit that the reason they failed was that they paid little if any attention to whatever it was they failed on. As soon as the familiar PR line is trotted out as a preliminary to whatever's being said all credibility is lost.
When it comes down to severe vulnerabilities Linux kernel & Windows are more or less level. It's Apple that has the problems. Also that pariah of applications, Flash, comes out lower than IE, Chrome and Firefox but a larger proportion of vulnerabilities are severe. Another oddity: Seamonkey which combines browser and Thunderbird functionality comes out lower than either Firefox or Thunderbird.
" People at my workplace complain about how hard Linux is to use, even describe it as "weird", but that is because many of them started with Windows XP (or maybe Windows 98) and didn't see what Linux was like years ago when getting a graphical desktop meant a long session with XF86configurator and a need for deep knowledge of your hardware."
To a large extent "hard to use" can translate as "different" but the desktop you're providing can also make a difference. Presumably they'd have come up with exactly the same reaction to Win 8.
"Step one is to fess up to customers exactly what you earn per-machine for the crap you are pre-installing."
And say exactly what it does. And I mean exactly. Not "it enables you to make better choices" or such weasel words but "it intercepts your communications to spy on what you're doing in order to serve up ads whether you want them or not".
"I guess it's an artefact of grafting support for the MS protocols onto GNU/Linux rather than having a true remote login."
A remote login would also require a root process in order to be able to fork a process under the eventual user ID. e.g.
ps -ef|grep getty
root 3849 1 0 08:55 tty1 00:00:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty1
etc. It's a consequence of the Unix security model.