Re: Not quite these distances, but still a PITA
"Morgan Computer"
Fond memories. And before that, Morgan Camera. Lots of Exakta bits in the side window.
42407 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
IIRC Drag and drop was one of the bits that W95 incorporated from HP's New Wave. New Wave was a layer that HP built on top of 3.x. If you looked at W95's copyrights HP were in there as were the Regents of UCB for the BSD networking stack.
All the WIMP elements had been round for a long time. I grant you that they way they were assembled in W95 hit a sweet spot (except for the lack of multiple workspaces) but as we all know they subsequently put a lot of effort into junking that.
The Ribbon? As far as most people seem to be concerned, they're welcome to all the blame for that.
"I guess that Microsoft's lawyers are a bit scary, even in Mumbai."
A requirement of trademarks is that you should defend them. If you fail to do that you lose them.
The odd thing is that if you use the Microsoft mail service under one of its ever-changing brand names the spam with the lowest probability of being filtered out is that purporting to come from themselves and yet it's the spam they should have the greatest success with - they should be able to find out whether they sent it. If they were ever taking misuse of their trademarks to court this lackadaisical approach to passing-off attempts which they could control would provide a stack of evidence against them
"Then along came Novell Netware which just ran and ran, didn't need rebooting every day and didn't crash"
My mercifully brief experience of Netware was the converse. IIRC the OS and <all> the services ran as a single process. An attempt to shut down a database brought the whole thing down in a heap. Novell was the server OS for MS clients until MS developed theirs.
Neither, of course, had anything like the reliability of Unix servers. That's the time of the apocryphal tale of a Unix server which suddenly disappeared from the LAN. On investigation it was found to have been turned off. Further investigation brought the response "Nobody ever came to reboot it so we assumed it wasn't being used.".
"I guess the money is big enough now for all these companies that they don't give a shit about those of us on the "outside" who got them to where they are today."
It also means that the money is big enough for any upstart who decides to produce a decent product and support it.
"Inability to speak to a real person who actually understands the product rather than someone from south India called Joe who can't really speak English even though they are reading from a script."
Unfortunately this criterion makes it increasingly hard to find a vendor of anything.
"a lot of cyanide was being flushed down the drain."
We had a Belfast sink* (we were in Belfast) in the lab that persistently leaked. I had a few goes at trying to tighten up the fittings over the years. Eventually I realized that the hydrofluoric acid that had been tipped down it had eaten its way through the glaze.
*Note for colonials: made out of white glazed earthenware.
"It took four burly wharfies to get her back up again"
I'm reminded of the day, years before the VAX had even been though of, when we took delivery of a large wooden crate containing a Phillips scintillation counter - big piece of kit about half as wide again as your normal rack. Although the electronics were packed in separate boxes it wasn't empty - it was filled with the paternoster mechanism for changing samples and the housing and screening for the PMs.
The transport firm had neglected to send in in a van that included a tail lift. The driver's idea was that we simply drop it off the back. Eventually someone found a long scaffolding plank. We let it down on its side, slid it down the plank & then stood it upright. I don't think anyone had checked in advance whether it would fit down the narrow passage into the lab; we had to get it out of its crate before we could move it further. Once he'd seen the innards the driver went very quiet.
'I'd expect UK border controls at the RoI / NI border to rise significantly to offset the phobia that such an access point could become a gateway to the UK for the "wrong sort of people".'
This has never been achieved in the past.
If by the Islander handle you mean the island of Ireland you'll probably be aware of the fact that there are properties which actually straddle the border. It's not feasible to put border controls within farms or houses.
@WatAWorld
You're displaying a fairly common human trait: thinking that your experience is universal. Those of us who have been zapping Windows in favour of Linux for friends, relatives or clients have a different experience. Clearly this isn't one that you're going to share; from what you say it seems likely it would be outside your comfort zone although you'd probably be surprised to find it wouldn't be outside your capabilities.
'Unless you're going to fall in line, buy a lot of "apps", and be the consumer Microsoft wants for its new business model, then they don't really need to be subtle about getting rid of you.'
That depends on how many people want to buy them. On that basis they could end up getting rid of more & more possible customers.
"it seems that they feel the only way to increase sales is to force ANY business to upgrade to Enterprise, whether or not it's an appropriate choice."
Of course the message received isn't necessarily the one that was intended. It could easily be interpreted as "Windows isn't aimed at SMBs any more.".
"Quickest solution?
So take it to the end of the chain, and make each website owner legally liable for all damages caused by malware served by visiting their site."
I agree that that ought to be the case. But it's not the quickest solution. The quickest solution is ad-blockers.
"you may find that the pension fund is lacking money that was given to the shareholders while BT had a pensions holiday."
The pensions holiday was forced on it by HM Treasury. Can't have companies evading tax by paying too much into pension schemes.
Ultimately, of course, it's HM Treasury on the hook because of the pensions guarantee. Other pension schemes that are in deficit because of enforced contributions holidays aren't so fortunate.
"The split of responsibility for the pension deficit would no doubt have caused some very considerable complications were BT forced to split off OR (as, arguably, most BT pensioners would have worked in areas which functionally fit with OR)."
If OR were to be floated off as O2 was with the same arrangements it would still be the BT pension scheme on the hook for those pensions in payment. I'm not sure about deferred pensions.
"The business also revealed net pension deficit of £5.2bn net of tax"
That's not exactly a revelation. It's had a deficit for years now. Like other pension deficits it's a consequence of government policy coupled with the law of unintended but-entirely-foreseeable-if-only-we-weren't-so-dumb consequences.
Once upon a time BT's pension scheme was in surplus. HM Treasury tend to treat pension contributions as a species of tax evasion* and force companies which are in surplus beyond limits to take a "contribution holiday". This means that the surplus is less than it could have been and more easily turned into a deficit. That's one side of it. The other was Brown's stealth taxation, specifically his removal of allowances on pension schemes' investment income. That was quite obviously a tax on the future. That future arrived years ago and, because pension schemes had less reserves because of the contribution holidays, they found themselves in deficit.
*Being Civil Servants they have the CS pension arrangements which are a species of Ponzi scheme. There's no pension fund. Pensions are paid out of current contributions being backed by HMG's current account where necessary. BTW, whatever the popular view of Civil Service pensions they're not that great in comparison to BT's.