Re: LOL!!
"! IT is the core of your business"
And if they keep demonstrating failure to maintain the core of their business the regulators should be asking them why they think they're entitled to keep their licence.
40432 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Protecting customer information is critically important to Hyatt, and we take the security of customer data very seriously,"
Why do they not engage the brain instead of uttering such tosh.
If it's critically important and you've just failed at it what does it say about your competence at stuff which is just very important or only important let alone nice to have?
For many of us the advance of systemd with the release of Debian 8 makes 2015 a not very great year at all. Debian 7 moves into LTS next month so that extends it a little further but it's getting time to get od my backside & make sure everything I want, including my favourite proprietary RDBMS & tools, can run on BSD or find substitutes.
"Linux: "Good morning, only 15,473 software updates so far today."
Thank you for your informed comment. Now let's look at reality.
First, and I can't speak for other versions, but with Debian updates arrive as they're ready. You can install them when you wish but it would be silly to not offer an important update promptly because today's the first Wednesday in the month & we only release on the first Tuesday.
Today brought 5 updates. I can tell the system to update. It tells me what's to be done including the following:
"Need to get 2,560 kB of archives.
After this operation, 1,024 B disk space will be freed."
but then asks for confirmation to go ahead rather than just doing it.
It took a second to download and a few more seconds to install. But look again at the second of those lines I quoted. Not only does the upgrade process tell you what the impact on the file system is going to be, sometimes it actually releases space.
The Linux upgrade process these days is in a universe Microsoft hasn't even thought about visiting.
"if you are not in the deb camp and want rpms then fedora is UEFI compatible as well."
It's a very long time since I used Fedora but AFAICR I found it to be release often, break often. Maybe a derivative of RH, say Centos or Scientific Linux, would be better; I'm sure they're UEFI compatible.
But as a stepping stone it might also be worth looking at one of the Ubuntu derivatives such as Zorin that set out to provide a user interface as close to W7 as possible.
@A/C
If you can scan a genuine paper bill header it's probably easiest to do a bit of editing and knock out a new one on a colour printer. Even better, knowing the waste "management" at the company that used to print my mobile & water bills, it might not be too difficult to obtain some genuine blank stock.
"And not a moment too soon!!!"
The problems you complain about with OO stem from standard operating practice. Take an existing idea - in this case existing ideas about data structures, add something - in this case glue the procedural stuff onto it, wrap the whole thing up in new nomenclature to disguise what you've borrowed, add some over-the-top stuff - e.g. your example about wheels, and tell the world you've invented something completely new.
Between them the new nomenclature and OOT stuff is enough to put many of us off for years.
OK, I left out inheritance but the basic principle is "data structures on steroids" but calling it that wouldn't have brought the same kudos.
" Like many companies these days, the Nest terms and conditions explicitly forbid customers from entering into class-action lawsuits against the company. Instead, all disputes are to be settled by arbitration on a case by case basis."
Whether this is a valid term or a meaningless jumble of letters could depend on local consumer protection law.
"I like your optimism"
Optimism? That was pessimism.
"I suspect that the EU courts will no longer have any jurisdiction over human rights in the UK before the year is out."
In that case HMG will end up with similar problems the US has re Safe Harbour when it comes to doing business with the rest of Europe. Then they find a few large companies deciding to migrate their HQs to other parts of the EU.
"democratic and judicial oversight"
I think you're confusing political with democratic.
What this bill does is attempt to legitimise the abolition of the presumption of innocence and to redefine "due" in the concept of "due process of law". Last year we celebrated the presence of that latter concept in the last 8 centuries of English law. We celebrated it by abolishing it.
"With the exception of traffic management, network security or a court order, the council says that there should be no interference with data traffic flowing across the internet. The wording is precise, strong and unambiguous."
So whatever chokes one service relative to another will be "traffic management". Got it. No ambiguity at all.
"I'm not really getting why Windows 10 could be responsible. ... Does HP think that buyers of their Win8/8.1 machines hate the OS so much that they would be willing to buy a whole new PC?"
AIUI HP were complaining that the final [sic] production build of W10 was made available to them too close to release date & this blocked production. But that doesn't seem to tally with tales of unsold stock clogging the warehouses.
"Before 10 came out I could update a clean 7 build in around a hour or two. Hit update, a minute later the list of 200 updates would appear, click install and go get on with something else for an hour or two."
The fact that this was considered acceptable, or at least normal, is a sad comment on the extent to which MS had brainwashed admins.
My aunt and mother were both great hoarders of photographs. But not great labellers. So I have problems of who were these Edwardian ladies staring at the camera and who were the children with them? And what was the building all these people were standing beside? A few labelled pictures are a useful archive; a few Tb of unlabelled jpegs are so many random bits.
"I don't have time to be picky about what is stored"
Maybe best to delete it all. If you don't have time to review it now you're never going to have time to look at it all or to find the one picture which you seem to remember you have somewhere if only you can find it...
"More to the point perhaps is the use for family histories; family trees including pictures,, scans of certificates and other historic addenda."
Print out on good quality paper. Your descendants might not be bothered to work out how to use your digital version but hard copy won't be a problem. Unless they burn it, of course; maybe you should print a large threat to come back & haunt them on the cover.
"When you Brits are being shafted (and in many ways, the rest of the world) you're very calm."
At present the matter is before Parliament. Despite what happens in PMQs florid displays of anger are likely to be counter-productive. A better tactic is presenting reasoned and reasonable arguments as ammunition for any sympathetic politicians who might be listening (as I hope Lord Strasburger still is despite the reception he was given).
"Add another thing - a judge can only grant a maximum of X warrants in any 24 month period. This is to stop a judge that is overly sympathetic to bullshit or probe to rubber stamping."
What concerns you here is what's sometimes called regulatory capture, the judges being the first layer of regulation. If you look at point 5 you'll see that this is also checked for. The approach I've suggested is to check for outcomes.
One could easily envisage a situation where a case has a large number of suspects The judge is presented with a request for warrants against all of them. I'm assuming that individual warrants would be issued for each suspect. This could eat up an undue proportion of your X without the judge being overly sympathetic to bullshit or rubber stamping. In fact, by having to read the background to the case once he could concentrate on wanting to know why there are so many suspects and requiring warrants to be vacated as soon as it became clear that a suspect was eliminated.
Rationing the inputs wouldn't be as effective as reviewing the outcomes.
"You missed one key thing."
No.
From point 5: "this would be to check for attempts to slip unjustified, overbroad requests through the system"
One of the purposes of the checking layer would be to prevent what you're concerned about.
A well-informed commentard on a thread some time ago pointed out than in some cases multiple warrants had to be sought to follow up on an initial warrant - IIRC an example was discovering that a suspect had a second mobile & another warrant had to be issued to cover that. It's likely that a warrant system that required undue follow-ups would be counter-productive - the judges would be overwhelmed with requests & not able to give due scrutiny. An effective system would need a sufficient degree of flexibility which is why I didn't suggest a specific granularity but a system of checks to countermand abuse.